+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Islamic law: a Divine gift

  1. #1
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India

    Islamic law: a Divine gift

    Islamic law: a Divine gift


    By Sidrah Unis

    LAW can simply be defined as a set of rules governing human conduct. The western concept of law presupposes a state. According to it, the state makes or authorizes to make rules that constitute law, and these rules are enforced on the basis of sanctions. The purpose that the law is made to serve may vary from welfare of the people to the interests of a regime.

    The origin, nature, and scope of the Islamic legal system is different from that of the western legal systems. Islamic law, in plain words, is the body of rules of conduct revealed by God to his Prophet (PBUH) whereby the people are directed to lead their lives.

    Compared to the western concept of law, the features of Islamic law, in brief, are: 1. It has not been decreed by any earthly ruler, but revealed by God. 2. It originates from Divine Revelation, not custom or tradition. 3. It remains valid, whether a state recognizes it or not. 4. Where a state does not recognize it, Islam ensures its observance by the Muslims living in its territory through cultivation of religious consciousness in the human soul and awakening of awareness through moral education. Thus, Islamic law applies to the conscience of a Muslim even if he is living in a non-Muslim state.

    5. It addresses every aspect of human life, not just the legal system. 6. Its purpose is to ensure the welfare of man, individually and collectively. It does not aim at the glorification of the lawgiver, as God is above all wants and weaknesses. 7. The means by which compliance with Islamic law is secured are of a wider character than the sanctions in the western legal systems.

    8. In a Muslim state, the community through a chosen representative or a group of representatives administers it. 9. When non-Muslims are living in a Muslim state, only those parts of Islamic law apply to them that are not specifically identified with the tenets of Islam. 10. Regarding its enforceability, Islamic law can be divided into the following three classes: a. Those laws that regulate men’s relations to and dealings among one another, their enforcement is incumbent upon the community; b. Those laws that only address the spiritual aspect of an individual’s life, are enforced, by God, by means of spiritual rewards and punishments; and c. Those laws that not only concern the spiritual aspect of individual life but also affect Muslim society, their enforcement is left to the discretion of the state.

    It must also be noted that though the western legal systems regulate the economic, social, and political affairs of a nation, they do not cover rules of moral behaviour. Such rules only exist in the form of customs and social manners, and are enforced by the sheer force of public opinion. Consequently, whenever the public accepts as moral or even starts ignoring certain immoral actions, the entire concept of morality, due to this moral laxity, transforms. Islamic law, on the other hand, reaches much deeper into thought, conduct, and life.

    The range of scope and purpose of Islamic law and western legal systems differ due to the different characters and abilities of their creators and proponents. It is a fact that in order to have an absolute comprehension of what the law should be, one must not only have before him the entirety of human life but also completely understand the human nature.

    No jurist can ever have such a complete picture of human life and nature. Only God has the ability to accurately know which rules are suitable for all human beings. Thus, the law prescribed for man by Him, through Divine Revelation, is the most comprehensive and expedient one. No wonder, most of the recent western concepts regarding human rights, rights of animals, international affairs, family matters, judicial independence and impartiality, legal representation, juristic personalities, charitable trusts, non-retroactivity, etc, were never alien to Islam.

    As it is the Revelation through which we become aware of the will of God, so it is the source of the laws of Islam. Revelation consists of: 1. Communications made by Gabriel, under the directions of God, to the Prophet (PBUH) either in the very words of God, or by hints; 2. Such knowledge as occurred in the mind of the Prophet through inspiration from God; and 3. Opinion of the Prophet, embodied in the form of ratiocination, delivered from time to time on issues that happened to be raised before him.

    In answer to the question as to how opinion of the Prophet can form part of Divine Revelation, God says: “Your companion errs not, nor does he deviate. Nor does he speak out of desire. It is naught but revelation that is revealed — One Mighty in Power has taught him, the Lord of Strength. So he attained perfection.” (Al-Quran, 53: 2-6)

    Revelation is available to us in the form of the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet. The Quran comprises only those Revelations that are made in the very words of God, while the rest form the corpus of the Sunnah. Here it must be mentioned that it is wrong to claim Ijma and Qiyas as sources of Islamic law. Both are mere tools provided in Islamic jurisprudence for further extension of the law.

    They only extend the laws given in the Quran and the Sunnah to matters not expressly covered by them. The methods of expansion of law should not be confused with sources of law.
    http://www.dawn.com/2005/08/05/op.htm
    Since there are a lot of threads that are Islam or near Islam oriented, one should try to understand the Islamic laws since that allows one to understand the psyche.

    I do see the Quaran TV (the only TV station that broadcast 24x7 on the Quaran and is located in Pakistan) as also I do read many websites on Islam and also talk to my Moslem friends.

    I do not accept all the interpretations that I see, read or hear. I thought this article does bring up some points that are interesting.

  2. #2
    Banned platinum786's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,086
    To be frank Shariah of today needs a look for the 21st century, tell a muslim that and you'll get an expression of shock and horror...for example, DNA evidence....etc.

    Quite simply each set of muslims has different tints of shariah....10 people can't agree on it 100%.

    It can only be logically used, when it's made logical again.

    Look it's law god gave right.....so i got a simple way to look at it, if it feels wrong, if your heart says it's wrong, then it cannot be shariah.

    For example, stoning to death a mother of a new born for adultery.....that's not Islam, my heart says otherwise.

    Chopping off a thiefs hands, and then not providing for his children and putting them thru college etc....that's not right, that's not islam, my heart says so.

    Pervez Musharraf said it in a debate on TV, we cannot implement shariah partially, we need to do it full whack, that means a review to bring it upto date from the last nearly millenia of rot and alteration and politics.

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor Asim Aquil's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Jun 04
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    2,033
    Country: Pakistan
    Quote Originally Posted by platinum786
    To be frank Shariah of today needs a look for the 21st century, tell a muslim that and you'll get an expression of shock and horror...for example, DNA evidence....etc.

    Quite simply each set of muslims has different tints of shariah....10 people can't agree on it 100%.

    It can only be logically used, when it's made logical again.

    Look it's law god gave right.....so i got a simple way to look at it, if it feels wrong, if your heart says it's wrong, then it cannot be shariah.

    For example, stoning to death a mother of a new born for adultery.....that's not Islam, my heart says otherwise.

    Chopping off a thiefs hands, and then not providing for his children and putting them thru college etc....that's not right, that's not islam, my heart says so.

    Pervez Musharraf said it in a debate on TV, we cannot implement shariah partially, we need to do it full whack, that means a review to bring it upto date from the last nearly millenia of rot and alteration and politics.
    word.

    Islam at its birth had concepts of democracy and secularism. Of course they weren't as perfect as they are today, but things lets say were more democratic than the greeks (who are officially considered as the pioneers of democracy in some ways).

    We need to take those concepts forward. Just because there wasn't an electoral process back then, doesn't mean its wrong to have one now. They did choose their leaders, now we have a better system to choose.

    Also the Jews and Christians were free to worship their own way... now this needs to be extended further too. Just because there weren't any lets say Hindus in the picture back then, the Saudi system of not allowing a hindu into the country's wrong and change has to come.

    Democracy and Secularism are not anti-Islam concepts. We just have too many preconceptions, as Platinum said: "tell a muslim that and you'll get an expression of shock and horror". You know in my debates, most people even don't know that secularism is just "separation of state from religious affairs". In their mind its like this "Partying all night, getting wasted on drugs and alcohol, screwing with different partners every night, (hehe so far sounds like fun?), lol this one's good, secularism also means turning gay, and basically anything thats considered liberal by conservatives in general".

    What needs to be cleared out is that secularism is a way of life where we'll right our principles down on paper, in a way that they apply EQUALLY to the citizens of a nation, be of any religion.

  4. #4
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Actually, ideal would be separate religion from the State or have rules applicable as per the Sharia for Moslems alone as they do in Malaysia.

    Now, if a Moslem has no hassle with the Sharia the way it is, then I reckon it should be so.

    On the question of reformation, Iqbal tried, but he was not sucessful and so I wonder if that would be possible. Maybe it will happen when education reaches all.

    I don't think partying all night or screwing all day and night is what people feel is secularism.

  5. #5
    Banned platinum786's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,086
    Ray....your last line, about the partying....ask the ones who oppose freedom and they'll say that is what secularism is.

    Another issue i have with sharia today is Divorce.

    Commonly u can declare you want to divorce a woman 3 times in one instance and it counts....as a divorce.

    However in the olden days, the technique for divorce used to be you had to delcare it 3 times over 3 months.....like once a month for 3 months, the point being to give u time to think.

    Listen to this, In a battle, Imam Ali had cornered a man, he had him pinned, he was going to kill him, he spat in his face, he let him go, saying i haven't killed you because i would have killed u in anger and not in the way of God....

    if he did that, and they say divorce is the most hated of acts by God, then why are you allowed to carry out divorce in a state of anger?

  6. #6
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Platinum,

    I am sure that in Islam there would be good things like the story of Imam Ali that you have written as it would be in any other religion.

    However, in the current world environment, those who are trying to be in the vanguard of Islam as its sole and worthy propagators of all things Islam (i.e. Osama and the other fiery and radical clerics the world over) aren't really giving the correct image.

    Untill they are brought under leash, the radical image unfortunately will continue. A very unfortunate situation indeed!

  7. #7
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Country: Switzerland
    I'm not into religion, but the Judeo-Christian laws(the 10 commandments) make a hell of a lot more sense to me, and leave a hell of a lot less room for mis-interpretation and abuse.

    Western society is largely built around those 10 commandments, and rightfully so IMO.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Fatwa against singing Vande Mataram
    By Vaman in forum International Politics
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: 27 Oct 07,, 22:47
  2. Christians besieged in Pakistan
    By Tronic in forum International Politics
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07 Jun 07,, 05:51
  3. ‘Divide and rule’ through Hudood bill?
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23 Aug 06,, 10:12
  4. The Islamic Threat
    By Associate in forum International Economy
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 15 Sep 05,, 05:35
  5. Islamic Justice Finds a Foothold In Heart of Europe.
    By vicky007 in forum International Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04 Aug 05,, 21:01

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts