+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 116

Thread: Documentary:"Inside North Korea"

  1. #1
    Contributor
    Join Date
    01 Jan 05
    Posts
    374
    Country: Sark

    Documentary:"Inside North Korea"

    The documentary "inside North Korea" premiered on the discovery channel last night. I am disgusted in myself as a human being to know that i live in a society that will not intervene and topple a government that spends its money on strengthening the military and not ending famine. Also religions cancelled i can't remember what they call it but the state religion hails Kim Jung Il 2 as a god and a saviour. Guys come on for the North Koreans lets intervene. IM FOR WAR AGAINST NORTH KOREA TO TOPPLE THE REGIME THAT CAN'T PROPERLY MANAGE THE ECONOMY LET ALONE NUCLEAR WEAPONS. LETS NOT WAIT FOR THE UN WE KNOW THEY WILL NOT REACH AN ARRANGMENT LETS GIVE THE PEOPLE OF NORTH KOREA WHAT THEY DESERVE "FREEDOM".

  2. #2
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,518
    Country: United States
    Nope, can't support the call for us to get into yet another land war in Asia. Recent history seems to indicate this to be a bad idea, and right now, you might've noticed we're a tad committed elsewhere.

    Furthermore, the North Koreans now have NUKES (thanks to perhaps the worst, most predictably disastrous deal ever struck with an aggressive and untrustworthy regime since the Nazis put one over on ole Neville, all thanks to that foreign policy Dream Team of Clinton/Albright). We dare not back 'em into a corner.

    Senator Moynihan, one of the last respectable Democrats (God rest his soul) used to say that the imperative foreign and security policy task of the West was managing the decline of the Soviet Union. He was prescient enough to realize that it would someday collapse, even though when he uttered those words it showed no signs of the rottenness at its core; it showed only strength and aggressive intent. But he was aware that it would eventually go down, and if it was handled incorrectly, it may either go out in a blaze of nuclear fire, or it may take another hundred years of human misery under the yoke of communist slavery to settle the question.

    So it is with North Korea. They've NEVER looked strong nor durable, and their imminent collapse has been predicted for about 20 years now, so that's one difference between them and the USSR. But our task remains the same: managing their decline, bringing their craft down to a relatively easy crash-landing; collapsing their rotten old prison building without involving any of the surrounding structures. Too fast, and the regime panicks and fires the worst weapons in the world into population centers in South Korea and Japan. Too slow, and the resulting misery just drags on and the humanitarian rebuilding required will simply be too much to cope with.

    SO...we've got to help them beach their foundering ship. Sinking it all at once is dangerous to us, and bailing the water out of it only delays the inevitable, with worse consequences when it goes down eventually anyway.

    But starting a war with 'em would be the worst thing we could do.
    "The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
    - George Orwell

  3. #3
    Ubi dubium ibi libertas Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    04 Sep 03
    Location
    Boston, MA, USPRA
    Posts
    4,789
    "IM FOR WAR AGAINST NORTH KOREA"

    Until we finish Iraq, I don't think this is a real option. In addition, you would need the support of South Korea since they would likely feel the brunt of the conflict.
    "Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have."
    "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"

    NEVER FORGET

  4. #4
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    If the US was stupid enough to attack NK we might aswell kiss Seoul goodbye and probably Tokyo.

  5. #5
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Seoul maybe in danger but we have absolutely no evidence that the NKs had managed to weaponize a nuke onto a rocket.
    Chimo

  6. #6
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Thousands of scud missiles pointed at Seoul can be as devasting as a nuke.

  7. #7
    Ubi dubium ibi libertas Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    04 Sep 03
    Location
    Boston, MA, USPRA
    Posts
    4,789
    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fi
    probably Tokyo.
    If you're referring to the DPRK nuking Tokyo, they are not capable of that at the moment.
    "Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have."
    "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"

    NEVER FORGET

  8. #8
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    They don't have 1000s of SCUDs.
    Chimo

  9. #9
    Ubi dubium ibi libertas Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    04 Sep 03
    Location
    Boston, MA, USPRA
    Posts
    4,789
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    They don't have 1000s of SCUDs.
    How many do they have?
    "Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have."
    "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"

    NEVER FORGET

  10. #10
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Leader
    If you're referring to the DPRK nuking Tokyo, they are not capable of that at the moment.
    That's why, I said probably.

    And Japan is within the range of North Korea's existing fleet of Nodong missiles.

  11. #11
    Regular
    Join Date
    07 Mar 05
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    149
    Country: United States
    It was an interesting documentary and a sad state of statesmanship. The North Korean Official claimed they had 200-300 nuclear weapons and "that's the only language the US understands". It was the first time I had heard that from someone within the DPRK. Maybe they're flat out lying or exxagerating but if there is any truth to it whatsoever the chances of a nuclear free Korean Pennsiula is gone.

    Personally I think they have more weaponized nuclear weapons than the CIA is willing to publicize. Not that I doubt the intelligence capabilities of the US. When the CIA says they have a few nuclear warheads it's telling me 'Yes they have a capability of launching a nuclear few attacks before they're wiped off the face off the earth.'

    The countries in that region need to deal with North Korea and we should suppport them and act as the off shore balancer. The DPRK is more of direct threat to countries in that region than it is to the US.

    We can't be at all places at all times. As much I'd like to see the people of the North Korea get help after watching the documentary an invasion of North Korea needs the support of the entire world. We can't be the ones to always carry the brunt of the burden when trying to help other nations.
    The purpose of all war is ultimately peace. - Saint Augustine
    For it tis' the doom of men that they forget. - Merlin the Magician
    The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing. - Albert Einstein

  12. #12
    Ubi dubium ibi libertas Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    04 Sep 03
    Location
    Boston, MA, USPRA
    Posts
    4,789
    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fi
    That's why, I said probably.

    And Japan is within the range of North Korea's existing fleet of Nodong missiles.
    One would think that they would need some of these missiles to hit military targets. Frankly, going after Japan seems to be a waste of a perfectly good missile that could be fired at SK, US ground forces, or USN.
    "Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today's world do not have."
    "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"

    NEVER FORGET

  13. #13
    Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Jul 04
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by Leader
    One would think that they would need some of these missiles to hit military targets. Frankly, going after Japan seems to be a waste of a perfectly good missile that could be fired at SK, US ground forces, or USN.
    I agree but if the US would go after NK it would just not be the US and SK it also probably include Japan.

    I think Kim Jong Il would try and make this WW3

    As for the scud missle question, I found this.

    On 29 April 2002, Lieutenant General Daniel R. Zanini, Commander Eighth United States Army, said that North Korea's missile inventory "approaches 1,000" during a speech at a Korea Institute for Defense Analyses seminar in Seoul.

    Now that was in 2002. I'm sure NK has added alot more to their arsenal since then.

    http://www.nti.org/db/profiles/dprk/...hwaso6_GO.html

  14. #14
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    The approaching 1000 count is of WMD missiles of all variants, not just SCUDs

    GlobalSecurity.org Missiles - North Korea Special Weapons
    Chimo

  15. #15
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by InfiniteDreams
    Personally I think they have more weaponized nuclear weapons than the CIA is willing to publicize. Not that I doubt the intelligence capabilities of the US. When the CIA says they have a few nuclear warheads it's telling me 'Yes they have a capability of launching a nuclear few attacks before they're wiped off the face off the earth.'
    They may have a few Hiroshima style bombs with some help from the Pakistanis. However, the Pak tested nukes would certainly won't fit on a rocket.

    Quote Originally Posted by InfiniteDreams
    The countries in that region need to deal with North Korea and we should suppport them and act as the off shore balancer. The DPRK is more of direct threat to countries in that region than it is to the US.
    The country most directly under threat is China - the refugee crisis is creating havoc with them. So much so, they have already set up camps that could handle up to 3 million people. However, there are alot more than 3 million NKs.

    Quote Originally Posted by InfiniteDreams
    We can't be at all places at all times. As much I'd like to see the people of the North Korea get help after watching the documentary an invasion of North Korea needs the support of the entire world. We can't be the ones to always carry the brunt of the burden when trying to help other nations.
    In any given scenario, the Chinese would be invading also from the north. It's alot cheaper to keep North Koreans in North Korean than to house, feed, and find jobs for them in China.
    Chimo

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. UK not part of anti-missile defence plans
    By Ray in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 12 Mar 07,, 20:08
  2. North Korea agrees to disarm?
    By smilingassassin in forum International Politics
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 26 Sep 05,, 08:40
  3. Official: N. Korea Capable Of Firing Nuke At Usa...
    By illusha in forum International Economy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 30 Apr 05,, 19:05
  4. Truth about North Korea and the US' foreign policies.
    By GuyFromTheSouth in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26 Oct 04,, 14:33

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts