
Originally Posted by
AdityaMookerjee
I am pondering. What makes a relatively small group, think about ways to destroy other groups, when there is no personal interaction among them? I am not thinking from the point of view of the terrorist. I am thinking from the point of view of the citizen. The terrorist is not the issue here. The issue is, that the terrorist wants to kill people, whom he knows nothing about. What is so important about the citizen, and what is so important to the citizen, when he associates with his surroundings, that the terrorist wants to destroy life and limb, of such people?
I don't think that anyone cares deeply, that the 'freedom' of the individual in some nations, is important to the concerned. This is also true, in certain respects, to the terrorist. He is also expressing his choice. Why, then, is this 'terrorism' happening? The United States, did not call the actions of Osama bin Laden, 'insanity'. What is one to draw from this? That he was a rational, reasonable man, when he planned the attacks, on 9/11? What was the reason for his reason, and his rationality? Let us be thoughtful. Are we imposing our freedom, on others, so that they feel the burden?
The most important point to ponder is, what is it, in our functioning, that makes rational, reasonable people want to kill us, and under-value our existence, and not rather, not bother about us? What is our response to such acts? Our response to such acts, is but a part of our lives.
This is an important consideration, because Osama bin Laden was only important, because he was a dreaded person, also called a terrorist. We wouldn't have even thought about him, otherwise.
Share this thread with friends: