+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 32 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 467
  1. #16
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07-10-08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,744

    Quote Originally Posted by bonehead View Post
    Not fair! They voted for it before voting against it.
    as did the republicans on defense apprpriation, raising the debt cieling and actually returning our balance sheet to the red. Like I said it's become dysfunctional. It seems both sides care more about political power and frustrating the opposition than serving us.

  2. #17
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    09-08-07
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    941

    I was never a cheerleader for Obama and while he's not been brilliant (he's compromised in a lot of ways), he's not Carter. Yet.

  3. #18
    Staff Emeritus
    She-Devil
    Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-08-03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    8,576

    Quote Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
    I was never a cheerleader for Obama and while he's not been brilliant (he's compromised in a lot of ways), he's not Carter. Yet.
    MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, the guy who once got a tingle up the leg at the mere thought of Barack Obama now suggests the President may be “Carteresque.” And there’s no way to interpret that as a compliment.

    Here’s a transcript of Matthews conversation with David Ignatius and Anne Kornblut of the Washington Post:

    Matthews: Welcome back. The word these days is optics, visuals, signals. In the Carter presidency, the optics were not exactly robust, and Ronald Reagan rode that to a big victory in 1980. Is the Obama White House sending some Carteresque signals these days? Some see that in the deep bow to the Emperor of Japan, an unforced error say critics. Then there was, there was what happened in China: Obama got nothing in the way of concessions over there in spite of playing the polite visitor. And his effort to speak directly to the Chinese was jammed by the government. Third, that decision to try the terrorists up in that federal court in New York City. Again, nothing that had to be done, and critics say it shows that Obama, his team doesn’t understand this is a war we’re in. David, that’s the question. These optics are everything in a president. Carter used to carry that garment bag over his shoulder. This president is he making mistakes like in China like in Japan?
    For the last two years Chris Matthews has acted as if Barack Obama is the second coming of Christ. Now even Matthews seems to recognize that he’s the second coming of Jimmy Carter.

    Chris Matthews calls Obama "Carteresque" Is the tingle gone? | I Hate the Media - Fun with Liberal Media Bias

    We’re conflicted. We don’t know whether to laugh or laugh really hard.

  4. #19
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-03-05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    4,787

    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
    So, you think he's BETTER than Carter. Even if he were - and he's dam' sure NOT - that's still pretty weak.


    As it is, though, even counting you, the Presiden't supporters are peeling away from him faster than any other President has managed to do before, So as far as getting a pass, you can give him one, and the rest of us will be far, far away from this discreditable performance, hoping it gets no worse.


    Never gave an opinion one way or the other if I think he is worse than Carter.

    Just correcting some of the discrepancies in the articles reasoning. It argues that Obama is worse because of X,Y and Z. But Y and Z are false then the author needs to reevaluate his outcome.

    For the record, I'm not an Obama supporter. I disagree with about 95% of the things that he has done. But I will correct lies and distortions against him, as I would any other President. He deserves to be judged by the truth.
    Many on the right wing nut job side are doing what those on the left wing Bush-Hitler" groups did.

    I thought we were above that

    Is he worse than Carter. With almost one year into a 4 year term, its too early to tell.

  5. #20
    Regular Countezero's Avatar
    Join Date
    25-12-09
    Posts
    99

    Quote Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
    Never gave an opinion one way or the other if I think he is worse than Carter.

    Just correcting some of the discrepancies in the articles reasoning. It argues that Obama is worse because of X,Y and Z. But Y and Z are false then the author needs to reevaluate his outcome.

    For the record, I'm not an Obama supporter. I disagree with about 95% of the things that he has done. But I will correct lies and distortions against him, as I would any other President. He deserves to be judged by the truth.
    Many on the right wing nut job side are doing what those on the left wing Bush-Hitler" groups did.

    I thought we were above that

    Is he worse than Carter. With almost one year into a 4 year term, its too early to tell.
    That's a great post.

    As far as the whole ending the War on Terror bit, I don't have a problem with it. Paul Pillar, the CIA's former CTC chief, wrote that dubbing the struggle against terrorism would be a mistake. He did so in a book he wrote BEFORE 9/11. So far as I know, his opinion has not changed. Paul Pillar, believes the expectations for any campaign against terrorism must be realistic in both its scope and its aims. “If there is a ‘war’ against terrorism,” he writes, “it is a war that cannot be won.”

    Such criticisms return us to the question about whether the so-called “war-footing” is appropriate for this political, economic and military undertaking. Specifically, by dubbing the conflict a war, the Bush administration has unconsciously established an unrealistic expectation for how victory against radical Islam and transnational terrorism will be achieved. Unlike the previous wars fought between states, Philip H. Gordon tells us that victory in the War on Terror “will not come when foreign leaders accept certain terms but when political changes erode and ultimately undermine the support for the ideology and strategy for those determined to destroy the United States.” According to J. Martin Rochester, in practical terms, this means that the “war” itself “will consist of the management of terrorism so that what incidents do occur are isolated and relatively minor in their lethality and destructiveness.” For Gordon and Rochester, terrorism is “like violent crime, deadly disease, and other scourges … it can be reduced and contained. But it cannot totally be eliminated. … The goal of eliminating terrorism entirely is not only unrealistic but also counterproductive.”

  6. #21
    Military Professional
    Staff Emeritus
    Scotch taster

    Join Date
    06-08-03
    Posts
    22,793

    Quote Originally Posted by Countezero View Post
    For Gordon and Rochester, terrorism is “like violent crime, deadly disease, and other scourges … it can be reduced and contained. But it cannot totally be eliminated. … The goal of eliminating terrorism entirely is not only unrealistic but also counterproductive.”
    For those who argued such, they ignored the historic lessons of the Mongols against the Assasins and British India against the Thugees.
    Chimo

  7. #22
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    07-10-08
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,744

    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    For those who argued such, they ignored the historic lessons of the Mongols against the Assasins and British India against the Thugees.
    If the terrorists had an impregnable fortress they gathered in I'd agree

  8. #23
    Military Professional
    Staff Emeritus
    Scotch taster

    Join Date
    06-08-03
    Posts
    22,793

    Tora Bora.
    Chimo

  9. #24
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    01-08-07
    Posts
    1,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
    If the terrorists had an impregnable fortress they gathered in I'd agree
    The Thugees were spread over a wide section of Central India (forests, scrublands, numerous small villages). The Chinese Triads in Malaya were spread out in both rural and urban areas and had international contacts. However British officers of those times, like Col. Sleeman and Capt. Spears, had extraordinary legal powers and their law was enforced by ex-Indian Army men who had nearly unlimited staying power.

  10. #25
    S-2
    S-2 is offline
    Military Professional S-2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-09-06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    5,664

    B.o.

    I think Troung and Gun Grape have done a fine job diminishing some of the beef here. There's nothing spectacular about the guy yet nor impossible to overcome.

    I have great faith in the system's ability to defeat the endeavors-good or bad-of any temporal entity such as a measly president. The monster is bigger than us all, even our pillars of checks and balances pale before the Washington protocol.

    Everybody and everything is buffered to palatable levels by "advise and consent".

    Remember that we're a country that managed to elevate Dwight Eisenhower to president but somehow missed on George C. Marshall. Go figure...:))
    "This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski

  11. #26
    Administrator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-09-03
    Posts
    12,764

    Quote Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
    You don't have to go back to the 1930s. Nixon, Bush Sr, Bush Jr Clinton all bowed to the Emperor. Bush Jr also kissed the King of Saudi.

    But they are not Obama so I guess they get a pass.
    I am so sick to death of hearing about Obama bowing to the Emperor of Japan. And like you said, what about Nixon and Bush Sr bowing to Hirohito of all people?? The one former Axis power ruler still living and still in power.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
    Also fails to mention that that bust was on loan from the UK Presented by Blair to Bush. Bush didn't return it prior to leaving. Obama did it for him. He also has the right to decorate his office any way he sees fit. Who cares
    Another example of "Let's pillory him for anything we possibly can, who gives a damn if it's the truth or not.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
    For the record, I'm not an Obama supporter. I disagree with about 95% of the things that he has done. But I will correct lies and distortions against him, as I would any other President. He deserves to be judged by the truth.
    Exactly.

    I recall when Hillary Clinton was running for the Democratic nomination. My e-mail inbox was always full of lies and nonsense and outright bullshit accusations against her.

    I'd always fire back a "Reply All" (usually quoting Snopes) about how it was a lot of bunk...and then asked "Why, with all that's factually objectionable to her based on your political stance, would you have to spam people's inboxes with hoaxes and urban legends?"


    Quote Originally Posted by Countezero View Post
    Specifically, by dubbing the conflict a war, the Bush administration has unconsciously established an unrealistic expectation for how victory against radical Islam and transnational terrorism will be achieved.
    I always shudder at that blunder. I shudder even more when I think of Gordon England's blunder of ordering that the "Don't Tread On Me" navy jack be flown from all USN ships until the end of the War On Terror.

    Brilliant move Gordo. Planning on staying SecNav indefinitely to enforce that order? Or maybe thinking that another Administration will say "Well, Gordon ordered it...better keep it in place because gosh he said so"

    Was he thinking it'd never get removed after he left office?

    Now when that happens, it'll either be a bald-faced lie that War is over/won or just a quiet admission that you shouldn't have ordered something so impossible in the first place?

  12. #27
    Senior Contributor Bigfella's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-07
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,895

    Quote Originally Posted by S-2 View Post
    I think Troung and Gun Grape have done a fine job diminishing some of the beef here. There's nothing spectacular about the guy yet nor impossible to overcome.

    I have great faith in the system's ability to defeat the endeavors-good or bad-of any temporal entity such as a measly president. The monster is bigger than us all, even our pillars of checks and balances pale before the Washington protocol.

    Everybody and everything is buffered to palatable levels by "advise and consent".

    Remember that we're a country that managed to elevate Dwight Eisenhower to president but somehow missed on George C. Marshall. Go figure...:))
    Unfortunately there are more than a few folk about (perhaps even on this board) who have gorged heavily enough on the more unhinged commentators on American life to consider Marshall a 'fellow traveller' at best, a 'traitor' at worst. A poor tribute to perhaps the greatest American of the C20th.
    Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

  13. #28
    Senior Contributor Bigfella's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-07
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,895

    Quote Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
    I am so sick to death of hearing about Obama bowing to the Emperor of Japan. And like you said, what about Nixon and Bush Sr bowing to Hirohito of all people?? The one former Axis power ruler still living and still in power.

    Another example of "Let's pillory him for anything we possibly can, who gives a damn if it's the truth or not.


    Exactly.

    I recall when Hillary Clinton was running for the Democratic nomination. My e-mail inbox was always full of lies and nonsense and outright bullshit accusations against her.

    I'd always fire back a "Reply All" (usually quoting Snopes) about how it was a lot of bunk...and then asked "Why, with all that's factually objectionable to her based on your political stance, would you have to spam people's inboxes with hoaxes and urban legends?"
    In furious agreement. If Obama's critics need to resort to hysterical hyperbole or outright invention they simply aren't paying attention. He has done or failed to do enough to keep any critic fully supplied with ammunition. Exaggeration & fantasy are not required.




    I always shudder at that blunder. I shudder even more when I think of Gordon England's blunder of ordering that the "Don't Tread On Me" navy jack be flown from all USN ships until the end of the War On Terror.

    Brilliant move Gordo. Planning on staying SecNav indefinitely to enforce that order? Or maybe thinking that another Administration will say "Well, Gordon ordered it...better keep it in place because gosh he said so"

    Was he thinking it'd never get removed after he left office?

    Now when that happens, it'll either be a bald-faced lie that War is over/won or just a quiet admission that you shouldn't have ordered something so impossible in the first place?
    Wanna bet that if it is done under Obama he will either be accused of claiming a false victory or 'giving up'.
    Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

  14. #29
    Senior Contributor Tarek Morgen's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-02-07
    Location
    Kassel
    Posts
    2,205

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
    Unfortunately there are more than a few folk about (perhaps even on this board) who have gorged heavily enough on the more unhinged commentators on American life to consider Marshall a 'fellow traveller' at best, a 'traitor' at worst. A poor tribute to perhaps the greatest American of the C20th.
    George Marshall? The guy who transformed an amateurish 200.000 men sized army into a million strong professional fighting force? The man behind the Marshal Plan and first 5 star General? Why would any American consider him a traitor?? The only negative thing I ever read about him was criticism about the replacement system he used in WWII, though that was rather a political decision iirc.
    uh I might be wrong


  15. #30
    Administrator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-09-03
    Posts
    12,764

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
    Wanna bet that if it is done under Obama he will either be accused of claiming a false victory or 'giving up'.
    Of course!

    Although it'll be said of anybody - to one degree or another - who does it...thus proving the idiocy of ordering it in the first place.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 32 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. $10 Billion and Getting Worse
    By Ironduke in forum The War on Terrorism
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 9th May 2009, 18:57
  2. Jimmy Carter and Hamas
    By Guardian in forum The War on Terrorism
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 27th April 2008, 14:33
  3. Average Iraqi's life is worse now
    By omon in forum The War in Iraq
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 12th December 2006, 22:48
  4. Carter on Bush foreign policy
    By Garry in forum American Politics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th November 2005, 18:04

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts