+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 53 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 790
Like Tree45Likes

Thread: Worse. Than. Carter.

  1. #151
    Patron
    Join Date
    29 Mar 08
    Posts
    189
    And Egypt for example has something like 700 Abrams tanks (which I understand are better than the Merkavas) and other advanced weapons - paid for by the US.

    Castellano
    The Abrams tanks are only as good as the crews that use them!
    I would put my money on an Israeli Merkava MBT against and Egyptian M1 Abrams MBT anyday.


    Regards
    Pioneer

  2. #152
    Patron Equilibrium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 05
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    267
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis View Post
    as historical comparison, south vietnam, a lynchpin in US foreign policy for over ten years, collapsed in less than one.
    It actually took closer to three years- beginning about a year before the 1973 Paris Peace Accords.

    The US lost the peace when the anti-war, Democrat dominated Congress gradually cut off military equipment and training aid to South Vietnam during the two years of its existence after US forces left the South. In 1973, it legislated the proscription of US air and sea forces in Indochina. In 1974, after Nixon's resignation, it accelerated the rate of reduction.

    But 1973, the year after US ground forces departed the South and US airpower was removed from the region actually saw the ARVN push the NVA to the extreme northwest border regions. It had gained more control of its territory- 85%- that at any time in is history.

    When the North's invasion finally occurred in 1975, the world's fourth largest air force lay grounded for lack of spare parts and fuel. Over half of the ARVN's trucks and armored vehicles were imobilized and its soldiers had not been paid in almost five months. Ammunition had been rationed to one rifle magazine per month and artillery rounds were limited to five per cannon per week. Under these conditions, the fact that the ARVN were able to resist for almost a month and the strategic reserve was able to fight the NVA to a tactical stalemate outside Saigon at Xuan Loc is creditable.

    Its not the success of the actual US combat and stabilization operation in Iraq and Afghanistan that concerns me more than what happens after our direct military commitment ends.
    Last edited by Equilibrium; 08 Mar 10, at 18:45.

  3. #153
    Administrator
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    8,843
    Country: United States
    equilibrium,

    It actually took closer to three years- beginning about a year before the 1973 Paris Peace Accords.
    the borders stayed put until Dec 1974, as you say:

    But 1973, the year after US ground forces departed the South and US airpower was removed from the region actually saw the ARVN push the NVA to the extreme northwest border regions. It had gained more control of its territory- 85%- that at any time in is history.
    so, when this happened:

    When the North's invasion finally occurred in 1975, the world's fourth largest air force lay grounded for lack of spare parts and fuel. Over half of the ARVN's trucks and armored vehicles were imobilized and its soldiers had not been paid in almost five months. Ammunition had been rationed to one rifle magazine per month and artillery rounds were limited to five per cannon per week. Under these conditions, the fact that the ARVN were able to resist for almost a month and the strategic reserve was able to fight the NVA to a tactical stalemate outside Saigon at Xuan Loc is creditable.
    as OoE mentioned a long while back, there is something seriously wrong with a country unable to produce/acquire small arms and ammo.


    Its not the success of the actual US combat and stabilization operation in Iraq and Afghanistan that concerns me more than what happens after our direct military commitment ends.
    i agree-- but has there been any indication from the DoD or the obama administration or even (past the one or two isolated nuts) in congress, that they are going to do the same? i'm wary of drawing wrong historical analogies.
    The human mind cannot grasp the causes of phenomena in the aggregate. But the need to find these causes is inherent in man’s soul. And the human intellect, without investigating the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions of phenomena, any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, snatches at the first, the most intelligible approximation to a cause, and says: “This is the cause!"

    -Leo Tolstoy
    War and Peace

  4. #154
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,518
    Country: United States
    Transponder code 7500: HIJACK.

    ANYhoo...Obama's worse than Carter.
    "The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
    - George Orwell

  5. #155
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
    Transponder code 7500: HIJACK.

    ANYhoo...Obama's worse than Carter.
    Correction:

    Obama's ONE year is worse than Carter's four years!

    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  6. #156
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,518
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    Correction:

    Obama's ONE year is worse than Carter's four years!

    I stand corrected, because yeah, that's a plain fact.
    "The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
    - George Orwell

  7. #157
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
    I stand corrected, because yeah, that's a plain fact.
    Someone should make a bill board with Jimmy Carter's mug on it with the caption of "Miss Me Yet?"

    :P
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  8. #158
    Administrator
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    8,843
    Country: United States
    you have to admit, it is something to be compared to that many people. i've heard obama compared to mao, stalin, hitler, OBL, the Joker, and the anti-christ.

    somehow the comparison to Carter just doesn't have as much oomph to it.
    The human mind cannot grasp the causes of phenomena in the aggregate. But the need to find these causes is inherent in man’s soul. And the human intellect, without investigating the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions of phenomena, any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, snatches at the first, the most intelligible approximation to a cause, and says: “This is the cause!"

    -Leo Tolstoy
    War and Peace

  9. #159
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis View Post
    you have to admit, it is something to be compared to that many people. i've heard obama compared to mao, stalin, hitler, OBL, the Joker, and the anti-christ.

    somehow the comparison to Carter just doesn't have as much oomph to it.
    But it sure is funnier.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  10. #160
    WAB Bartender Defense Professional
    Military Professional
    Bluesman's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Nov 04
    Location
    Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    8,518
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by astralis View Post
    you have to admit, it is something to be compared to that many people. i've heard obama compared to mao, stalin, hitler, OBL, the Joker, and the anti-christ.

    somehow the comparison to Carter just doesn't have as much oomph to it.
    People go over-the-top on stuff they care passionately about all the time. See: George W. Bush.

    My OP didn't do that. Wasn't going for oomph. By any objective measure, he IS worse. By a very long way.
    "The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
    - George Orwell

  11. #161
    Administrator
    Lei Feng Protege
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    23 Aug 05
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    8,843
    Country: United States
    from David Brooks.

    Op-Ed Columnist - What Obama Stands For - NYTimes.com

    Getting Obama Right

    David Brooks

    If you ask a conservative Republican, you are likely to hear that Obama is a skilled politician who campaigned as a centrist but is governing as a big-government liberal. He plays by ruthless, Chicago politics rules. He is arrogant toward foes, condescending toward allies and runs a partisan political machine.

    If you ask a liberal Democrat, you are likely to hear that Obama is an inspiring but overly intellectual leader who has trouble making up his mind and fighting for his positions. He has not defined a clear mission. He has allowed the Republicans to dominate debate. He is too quick to compromise and too cerebral to push things through.

    You’ll notice first that these two viewpoints are diametrically opposed. You’ll, observe, second, that they are entirely predictable. Political partisans always imagine the other side is ruthlessly effective and that the public would be with them if only their side had better messaging. And finally, you’ll notice that both views distort reality. They tell you more about the information cocoons that partisans live in these days than about Obama himself.

    The fact is, Obama is as he always has been, a center-left pragmatic reformer. Every time he tries to articulate a grand philosophy — from his book “The Audacity of Hope” to his joint-session health care speech last September — he always describes a moderately activist government restrained by a sense of trade-offs. He always uses the same on-the-one-hand-on-the-other sentence structure. Government should address problems without interfering with the dynamism of the market.

    He has tried to find this balance in a town without an organized center — in a town in which liberals chair the main committees and small-government conservatives lead the opposition. He has tried to do it in a context maximally inhospitable to his aims.

    But he has done it with tremendous tenacity. Readers of this column know that I’ve been critical on health care and other matters. Obama is four clicks to my left on most issues. He is inadequate on the greatest moral challenge of our day: the $9.7 trillion in new debt being created this decade. He has misread the country, imagining a hunger for federal activism that doesn’t exist. But he is still the most realistic and reasonable major player in Washington.

    Liberals are wrong to call him weak and indecisive. He’s just not always pursuing their aims. Conservatives are wrong to call him a big-government liberal. That’s just not a fair reading of his agenda.

    Take health care. He has pushed a program that expands coverage, creates exchanges and moderately tinkers with the status quo — too moderately to restrain costs. To call this an orthodox liberal plan is an absurdity. It more closely resembles the center-left deals cut by Tom Daschle and Bob Dole, or Ted Kennedy and Mitt Romney. Obama has pushed this program with a tenacity unmatched in modern political history; with more tenacity than Bill Clinton pushed his health care plan or George W. Bush pushed Social Security reform.

    Take education. Obama has taken on a Democratic constituency, the teachers’ unions, with a courage not seen since George W. Bush took on the anti-immigration forces in his own party. In a remarkable speech on March 1, he went straight at the guardians of the status quo by calling for the removal of failing teachers in failing schools. Obama has been the most determined education reformer in the modern presidency.

    Take foreign policy. To the consternation of many on the left, Obama has continued about 80 percent of the policies of the second Bush term. Obama conducted a long review of the Afghan policy and was genuinely moved by the evidence. He has emerged as a liberal hawk, pursuing victory in Iraq and adopting an Afghan surge that has already utterly transformed the momentum in that war. The Taliban is now in retreat and its leaders are being assassinated or captured at a steady rate.

    Take finance. Obama and Tim Geithner are vilified on the left as craven to Wall Street and on the right as clueless bureaucrats who know nothing about how markets function. But they have tried with halting success to find a center-left set of restraints to provide some stability to market operations.

    In a sensible country, people would see Obama as a president trying to define a modern brand of moderate progressivism. In a sensible country, Obama would be able to clearly define this project without fear of offending the people he needs to get legislation passed. But we don’t live in that country. We live in a country in which many people live in information cocoons in which they only talk to members of their own party and read blogs of their own sect. They come away with perceptions fundamentally at odds with reality, fundamentally misunderstanding the man in the Oval Office.
    The human mind cannot grasp the causes of phenomena in the aggregate. But the need to find these causes is inherent in man’s soul. And the human intellect, without investigating the multiplicity and complexity of the conditions of phenomena, any one of which taken separately may seem to be the cause, snatches at the first, the most intelligible approximation to a cause, and says: “This is the cause!"

    -Leo Tolstoy
    War and Peace

  12. #162
    Patron Freeloader's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Jan 09
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    214
    Country: United States
    "Barack Obama’s decision to throw a bust of Sir Winston Churchill out of the Oval Office within days of taking power set the tone for his foreign policy. It sent a clear signal that the president cared little about the Anglo-American Special Relationship and the transatlantic alliance in general. It spoke volumes about Obama’s disdain for Britain, a nation that he has never mentioned in a major policy speech, as well as his scorn for the kind of powerful, assertive leadership that Churchill embodied."

    I never knew that. What's his problem with England? They're only our best ally and he did that? What a tool.

  13. #163
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Mar 05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    5,845
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Freeloader View Post
    "Barack Obama’s decision to throw a bust of Sir Winston Churchill out of the Oval Office within days of taking power set the tone for his foreign policy. It sent a clear signal that the president cared little about the Anglo-American Special Relationship and the transatlantic alliance in general. It spoke volumes about Obama’s disdain for Britain, a nation that he has never mentioned in a major policy speech, as well as his scorn for the kind of powerful, assertive leadership that Churchill embodied."

    I never knew that. What's his problem with England? They're only our best ally and he did that? What a tool.
    Its a BS story.

    The bust was on loan to Pres Bush from PM Blair after 9/11.

    It was returned during the transition.

  14. #164
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    15 Feb 07
    Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Posts
    44
    Country: United States

    PLease, George Bush jr will go down as the worst Prez

    1) Invasion of Iraq was on completely false pretenses, the yellow cake Uranium story was hilarious. Even Iran with its extensive nuclear program could not enrich Uranium to 20% till today and Saddam with his Lego French reactor was gonna make the BOMB? Please. Here is what the Chinese analyzed when Bush went to war, they thought the US would go into severe debt to them and go bankrupt(or default or high inflation). The cost of invading Iraq is $1 trillion and climbing. Hey guess the real irony here, TOTAL from France and Sinopec from China were among the first to get oil deals from Iraq. Absolutely ridiculous.

    2) USA has no money to invade Iran or wipe out its nuke program by a strategic strike. Missile defense against Iranian nukes are of no consequence to US mainland. Its Europe's problem. Let France do it. They have more issues with Iran then us.

    The major issue facing US is not foreign policy but no money. That was due to Bush pushing Greenspan to give lower rates and inflating housing bubble.

  15. #165
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quick, let's defend Carter by invoking Bush.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 53 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. $10 Billion and Getting Worse
    By Ironduke in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09 May 09,, 19:57
  2. Jimmy Carter and Hamas
    By Guardian in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 27 Apr 08,, 15:33
  3. Average Iraqi's life is worse now
    By omon in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 12 Dec 06,, 23:48
  4. Carter on Bush foreign policy
    By Garry in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14 Nov 05,, 19:04

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts