+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 133

Thread: Uganda to apply death penalty towards homosexuality

  1. #16
    Senior Contributor chakos's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Apr 08
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,117
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by crooks View Post
    Very true - Rachel Maddow done a good piece on it a few days ago:

    I find it mildly amusing that they plan to make it an extraditable offence...

    So if a Ugandan man on holidays in Australia has a relationship with another man the Ugandan government will apply to the Aussie government to extradite him for said offence so they can either put im in prison for life or hang him.

    That would have the effect of giving the Ugandan man an instant refugee status in Australia. This could cause a flood of Ugandan homosexuals fleeing to western countries and having a public gay relationship in order to get out of the place. Once the Ugandan government launches extradition proceedings then there is absolutelly zero chance said western government would return the Ugandan. In fact he would then have proof that the government plans to persecute him based on his sexuality. Instant refugee status in most parts.
    The best part of repentance is the sin

  2. #17
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    I don't agree with it, but I must respect their culture.
    Uh, why? Barbarism sounds like a lousy approach to culture. Who in their right mind cares who ******s who as long as both parties are grownups?

    Also, Uganda is a beautiful place. We need it. I'll buy a hunting license. Let's invade. F*ck'em.

    Prof

  3. #18
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    Wow. That asteristical (Hoo. Neologism!) above replaced "D*i*d*d*l*e*d). Someone needs to tinker with this program.

    Prof

  4. #19
    Senior Contributor chakos's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Apr 08
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,117
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Prof View Post
    Uh, why? Barbarism sounds like a lousy approach to culture. Who in their right mind cares who ******s who as long as both parties are grownups?

    Also, Uganda is a beautiful place. We need it. I'll buy a hunting license. Let's invade. F*ck'em.

    Prof
    Sounds like fun... count me in.

    Im always up for the invasion of a 3rd world country
    The best part of repentance is the sin

  5. #20
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    F*ckin' aye. We need a new park. I'll dye my beard. Reenlist. No. Go by myself. I resent Ugandans. They ate Dora Bloch. They have buffalos. Yummy. YeeeeHah.

    Prof

  6. #21
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Prof View Post
    Uh, why? Barbarism sounds like a lousy approach to culture. Who in their right mind cares who ******s who as long as both parties are grownups?

    Prof
    Sir, I think you have missed my "not so subtle" jab at "multi-culturalism."

    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  7. #22
    Global Moderator Defense Professional JAD_333's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Apr 07
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    6,876
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by crooks View Post
    Why is Uganda attacking Homosexuality?

    Why is Uganda attacking homosexuality? - CNN.com



    Wow, this is crazy beyond belief, Africa seems to be getting even more regressive socially, even as progess is being made in other areas - in these difficult budget times anyone up for an aid boycott?


    Whether true or not, it's going to come out (has already) that the current president of Uganda is very cushy with a group of US Senators who belong to a conservative US religious organization called The Family that strongly condemns homosexuality. Also known as the C Street group. Senator Ensign of recent sex-scandal fame is one member along with Sen. Coburn...
    These guys have a lot of influence on what third world countries get US aid... The president of Uganda stays at the C Street residence when on non-official visits, which I've heard is often...

    Ensign moves out of home on C Street - Sunday, Nov. 8, 2009 | 2 a.m. - Las Vegas Sun
    To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education - Plato

  8. #23
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    Sir, I think you have missed my "not so subtle" jab at "multi-culturalism."

    I miss things all the time, subtle or not so... Drool. Gibber.

    Prof

  9. #24
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    I didn't hear the whole article, but apparently Uganda has stepped back some on this.

    Prof

  10. #25
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Sep 09
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Country: UK
    It is banned in most Islamic countries today.
    So it is more an issue with acceptable punishment.
    The west is mainly liberal and cannot understand the laws of many countries.
    I certainly can't.

  11. #26
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by dr prescription View Post
    It is banned in most Islamic countries today.
    So it is more an issue with acceptable punishment.
    The west is mainly liberal and cannot understand the laws of many countries.
    I certainly can't.
    Ah. I think that if you'd replace "understand" with "approve of" you'd be more accurate. Intolerance is much easier to understand than it is to accept for "many countries." Doesn't stop us from being disgusted by it, with or without understanding. As time goes on I keep getting the firmer & firmer impression that most Islamic countries want to ban the way people tie their shoes. Not just there, but here as well, once their inevitable, God-ordained takeover occurs.

    Prof

  12. #27
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Sep 09
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Country: UK
    Quote Originally Posted by Prof View Post
    Ah. I think that if you'd replace "understand" with "approve of" you'd be more accurate. Intolerance is much easier to understand than it is to accept for "many countries." Doesn't stop us from being disgusted by it, with or without understanding. As time goes on I keep getting the firmer & firmer impression that most Islamic countries want to ban the way people tie their shoes. Not just there, but here as well, once their inevitable, God-ordained takeover occurs.

    Prof
    I agree. Sheep-like in my opinion.

  13. #28
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Mar 05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    5,845
    Country: United States
    You would ever see a Christian values based nation with such laws. Why cannot other countries and religions be as tolerant as the US and out Judea Christian value system?

    We would never kill someone for being a homosexual.

    We would only lock them up under the sodomy laws, (prior to the 2003 SCOTUS decision that invalidated them). Most states had repealed those laws in the 70s and 80s, but these were still in effect in 2003

    Michigan, the first offense was 15 years, 2d Life.

    Idaho- 5yrs to life

    NC and Ok it was 10 yrs

    In all, 14 states still had antihomosexual laws on the books in 2003.

    The every State in the US had those laws until the 70s when states started repealing them.(Ill repealed theirs in 1962).

    We are not too far ahead Uganda when it comes to this issue.
    Its called Tourist Season. So why can't we shoot them?

  14. #29
    Military Professional Prof's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Oct 09
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    847
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by dr prescription View Post
    I agree. Sheep-like in my opinion.
    There's more to it (the West/Islamic relationship) than that, but I haven't really been able to get my philosophical teeth into it. I probably won't today, either, but let's give it a shot. Bear with me.

    We had a a marvelous dog named Jaysson. As have been all our dogs, he was a mutt. His mother, Spasm, was 65lb mix who looked like a collie/shepherd cross. Her father was an absolutely huge German shepherd named Frank who weighed in at ~135lbs. Biggest purebreed shepherd I've ever seen. Jaysson's father was a big (~90lb) Lab named Jay.

    When Jaysson was in good shape he weighed ~110lb. Looked like a giant, rangy Lab. Hound of the Baskervilles material. He was a dignified gentleman with a good sense of humor who put up just fine with small yappy dogs in the neighborhood who tormented him, only occasionally pushing them away with a massive paw. He resented dogs larger than he was & occasionally I had to intervene to keep him intact when he'd attack a Saint Bernard or something, but he was otherwise a well-behaved animal.

    Once, when we were at a party down in the weeds at a group-made pond in Shelby County one of the attendees brought an 80lb Lab named Henry. Henry resented Jaysson, evidently in much the same way that Jaysson himself resented bigger dogs. After awhile, Jaysson got tired of dodging snarling dominance attacks, picked Henry up by the middle of the back so that all 4 legs were off the ground & shook him. Henry behaved himself punctiliously thereafter. I wasn't mad at Jaysson. Henry's owner wasn't mad at Jaysson. The doggies just straightened out their social life.

    OK. Canine parable mostly over. We in the West have been guilty of a sort of bizarre, potentially suicidal anti-cultural nobless oblige that we need to stop. Or we'll melt away.

    Cultural relativism is all very well. It's good to understand your neighbors & put yourself in their places; see the world through their eyes. But it doesn't work so well if the other dog in the yard belligerently refuses to do the same thing.

    I don't see the slightest indication that any Islamic state engages in it. The Imams KNOW what's right, & what's destined to come about. They keep the large majority of their populace in ignorance, poverty & hatred. There may well be such an entity as moderate Islam. I don't know. Locally? I'm not sure if we have people in the State Department, the intelligence community or the military trained to recognize it, or more important, to recognize departures from it if the intent to deceive is present. In essence, we require ourselves to behave in a way that we allow our foremost current adversaries to ignore.

    This isn't smart. Pick'em up & shake'em.

    Prof

  15. #30
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Sep 09
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Country: UK
    Quote Originally Posted by Prof View Post
    There's more to it (the West/Islamic relationship) than that, but I haven't really been able to get my philosophical teeth into it. I probably won't today, either, but let's give it a shot. Bear with me.

    We had a a marvelous dog named Jaysson. As have been all our dogs, he was a mutt. His mother, Spasm, was 65lb mix who looked like a collie/shepherd cross. Her father was an absolutely huge German shepherd named Frank who weighed in at ~135lbs. Biggest purebreed shepherd I've ever seen. Jaysson's father was a big (~90lb) Lab named Jay.

    When Jaysson was in good shape he weighed ~110lb. Looked like a giant, rangy Lab. Hound of the Baskervilles material. He was a dignified gentleman with a good sense of humor who put up just fine with small yappy dogs in the neighborhood who tormented him, only occasionally pushing them away with a massive paw. He resented dogs larger than he was & occasionally I had to intervene to keep him intact when he'd attack a Saint Bernard or something, but he was otherwise a well-behaved animal.

    Once, when we were at a party down in the weeds at a group-made pond in Shelby County one of the attendees brought an 80lb Lab named Henry. Henry resented Jaysson, evidently in much the same way that Jaysson himself resented bigger dogs. After awhile, Jaysson got tired of dodging snarling dominance attacks, picked Henry up by the middle of the back so that all 4 legs were off the ground & shook him. Henry behaved himself punctiliously thereafter. I wasn't mad at Jaysson. Henry's owner wasn't mad at Jaysson. The doggies just straightened out their social life.

    OK. Canine parable mostly over. We in the West have been guilty of a sort of bizarre, potentially suicidal anti-cultural nobless oblige that we need to stop. Or we'll melt away.

    Cultural relativism is all very well. It's good to understand your neighbors & put yourself in their places; see the world through their eyes. But it doesn't work so well if the other dog in the yard belligerently refuses to do the same thing.

    I don't see the slightest indication that any Islamic state engages in it. The Imams KNOW what's right, & what's destined to come about. They keep the large majority of their populace in ignorance, poverty & hatred. There may well be such an entity as moderate Islam. I don't know. Locally? I'm not sure if we have people in the State Department, the intelligence community or the military trained to recognize it, or more important, to recognize departures from it if the intent to deceive is present. In essence, we require ourselves to behave in a way that we allow our foremost current adversaries to ignore.

    This isn't smart. Pick'em up & shake'em.

    Prof
    I get your point.
    There has been too much pandering to the Islamic views in the UK and so much funding for Islamic schools etc.
    But on the other hand, when 52 people die in 7/7 attacks we watch tv programs about it and have aneversaries and lots of debate but when it happens in muslim countries it's business as usual. Maybe we see life as cheaper out there. Maybe we see these people as lesser people the way they see gays as lesser.
    But I firmly agree with your point.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Saddam Execution Thread
    By Ironduke in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 741
    Last Post: 17 Mar 08,, 17:34
  2. gays.. good or bad?
    By AreYouCereal in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 237
    Last Post: 29 Oct 07,, 02:02
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22 Dec 06,, 16:24
  4. Death Row vs. Bay Views
    By Gio in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18 May 05,, 16:28

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts