Tarek,Originally Posted by tarek
I am not qualified to comment on what is the right or wrong understanding of Islam and flowing directly from that, what is right (just) or wrong (unjust) law per Islam.
I can however concur with Asim's view that it is certainly "cancerous", though I would have a stronger epithet in mind.
Curbing myself, I will simply say that having "just" laws while not sufficient to prevent discrimination, at least in that it constitutes a break down in the law, offers the implicit hope of redressal. In the case of unjust laws like the Hudood/Blasphemy laws enacted in Pakistan, discrimination takes place because of the law. That not only constitutes complete failure on the part of the Nation State but also forecloses all avenues of hope for the victim.
Anyway Khalid Ahmed in his today's Urdu Press Review has devoted a fair bit of space on the Hudood law and minorities :
According to Juhud-e-Haq (November 10, 2004) monthly in its November issue Sindh National Party protested in Shadadpur against the abduction of the Hindus in two months. Kapil Dev was kidnapped from Clifton on August 24, in front of his school and was not found. Dr Nanak Ram was threatened with abduction till he ran away to India. Bhagat Ram and Santosh Kumar too were not recovered. Sindh National Party went on hunger strike for them in Larkana.
Pakistan as an ideological state is mopping up the non-Muslims because they are zimmis and cannot be equal citizens. They are all prospective victims of the Blasphemy Law. Sindh National Party reminds us that we have stubbed our toe twice on misunderstanding national bonding on the basis of language. First in East Pakistan, then in Sindh.
Monthly Juhud-e-Haq (November 10, 2004) recorded in its November 2004 issue that in Mirpur Khas 15 persons of Ahmedi community were hauled up under Section 298-C for writing 786 on their wedding cards. Those put behind bars included three brides and their bridegrooms. The wedding cards also contained such incriminating words as As-Salam-o-Alaikam, Insha Allah and Marhoom. When a welfare organisation visited the affected Ahmedis at their homes it found them completely terrorised and their houses locked.
The Ahmedis thought they could get away with the numerals denoting Bismillah. They could not have claimed salam as a Jewish salutation either. An entire nation is devoted to victimising them and covering itself with their sacrificial blood. The Blasphemy Law is meant to trap them and the reference to religion in the passports is intended to make them wear a kind of Star of David. Other non-Muslims get caught in this trap and suffer needlessly. More candidates are emerging for our national pastime of cleansing the state of unwanted humanity. The Shia and the Ismailis are next.
According to Khabrain (November 14, 2004) journalist Munawwar Mohsin who was under life imprisonment after an insulting email was published inadvertently in The Frontier Post, Peshawar, was freed by Peshawar High Court because it found him not guilty. The offence was reported in 2001 and an emotional sessions judge had given a stiff sentence for an inadvertent act.
It took four years for an innocent man to get off the hook. The sessions judge in Peshawar was not alone in doing what he did. Judges at the lower courts go overboard with their religious passions. One judge in Lahore sentenced Yusuf the False Prophet to death on faulty evidence. The High Court would have let him off but he was killed in prison by a criminal who was also a member of a jihadi militia. One Lahore High Court judge was killed by a fanatic for allowing bail to a Christian pre-adolescent boy who had been condemned to death for blasphemy. But one Lahore High Court judge took the cake. While still serving he would address meetings of citizens and recommend that they kill a blasphemer on their own without registering a case under the infamous law. *


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Share this thread with friends: