Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: U.S. Congressmen attack India's relations with Iran, link this to nuclear deal

  1. #1
    Seeker of Rivendell Karthik's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Dec 04
    Posts
    402

    U.S. Congressmen attack India's relations with Iran, link this to nuclear deal

    U.S. Congressmen attack India's relations with Iran, link this to nuclear deal
    Text of Lantos letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh

    Tom Lantos, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the United States House of Representatives, and six other leading Congressmen wrote a highly controversial letter, dated May 2, 2007, to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. In the missive, they have attacked India's relations with Iran, warned that the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal might be jeopardised by the continuation of these relations, and also accused India of making illegal efforts to procure sensitive technology for its ballistic missile programme. They have demanded that India "cease illicit procurement activities in the U.S., sever military cooperation with Iran, and terminate India's participation in the development of Iran's energy sector." Here is the text of their letter:

    Dear Prime Minister Singh:

    We are writing to express our grave concern regarding several recent developments that, if left unaddressed, have the potential to significantly harm prospects for the establishment of the "global partnership" between the United States and India that you and President Bush announced on July 18th, 2005 and for peaceful nuclear cooperation between our two countries.

    As you are aware, on April 2nd, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted several individuals in the United States for allegedly conspiring with the government of India - including an employee of the Indian Embassy in Washington, D.C. - to illegally procure sensitive technology for India's ballistic missile program. This activity, which apparently occurred as recently as April 2006, appears to be a significant violation of India's September 2004 pledge not to "obtain or use U.S. origin licensable items in contravention of U.S. export control laws and regulations" and is inconsistent with efforts to increase the level of trust between our two nations.

    Regarding Iran, we are deeply concerned by India's increasing cooperation with that country, including the exchange of visits between high-level officials, enhanced military ties, and negotiation of agreements to establish closer economic relations.

    In March, the commander of the Iranian navy, Rear Admiral Sajjad Koucheki-Badelani, visited India at the invitation of Admiral Sureesh Mehta, the chief of staff of the Indian navy, to discuss the strengthening of military relations. A "joint defense working group" reportedly has been established and will meet later this year in Tehran to pursue broader cooperation in defense, including training Iranian military personnel.

    Such cooperation raises renewed questions about the possible diversion of sensitive technology to Iran, for which Indian entities have been sanctioned in recent years, including U.S.-origin technology provided to India in the context of civilian nuclear and space cooperation.

    We are also concerned that broadened economic relations between India and Iran are being pursued. Among the most prominent developments is the agreement reached earlier this year for the construction of a major natural gas pipeline from Iran to Pakistan and India that will provide the government of Iran with billions of dollars of revenue.

    Most recently, India's Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Murli Deora met with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Minister of Petroleum Kazem Vaziri-Hamaneh to pursue an agreement on liquefied natural gas reached in 2005.

    We must point out that these ventures could be subject to U.S. action under the Iran Sanctions Act.

    Far more serious is that these and other recent steps by India to enhance its economic cooperation with Iran will undermine the international community's efforts to impose financial and other constraints on the Iranian government to persuade it to stop its program to acquire a nuclear weapons capability.

    India's increasingly broad cooperation with Iran is especially disturbing in terms of its impact on the United States. As you are aware, Iran's senior officials have openly and repeatedly proclaimed their intention to undermine American interests in the Middle East and elsewhere. American military personnel in Iraq have been targeted and killed by extremists trained and armed by Iran, and Tehran is actively working to defeat U.S. and coalition efforts to stabilize Iraq. More broadly, Iran is seeking military domination of the Persian Gulf and continues to arm and support terrorists in Iraq, Lebanon, and other countries.

    It is difficult for us to fathom why India, a democracy engaged in its own struggle against terrorism, would want to enhance security cooperation with a repressive government widely regarded as the world's most active state sponsor of terrorism.

    India's pursuit of closer relations with Iran appears to be inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the July 18th, 2005 announcement by you and President Bush of the establishment of a "global partnership" between our two countries. It also is contrary to the pledge that India "would play a leading role in international efforts to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, chemical, biological and radiological weapons."

    And given Iran's role in sponsoring terrorism, this cooperation calls into question your commitment to the statement in the same announcement that "terrorism is a global scourge and the one we will fight everywhere."

    The expectation of an enhanced effort by India to restrain Iran's nuclear weapons program was a crucial factor in persuading Congress to approve the Henry J. Hyde United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act. As you are aware, a prerequisite for peaceful nuclear cooperation is the approval by Congress of a so-called 123 Agreement. We must stress that the subject of India's strengthening relationship with Iran will inevitably be a factor in the consideration of that Agreement when it is presented to Congress.

    As strong proponents of closer ties between the United States and India, we are deeply concerned that the developments outlined in this letter have a significant potential to negatively affect relations between the U.S. and India in general and consideration by Congress of the 123 Agreement in particular.

    Mr. Prime Minister, we urge you to provide assurances that India will cease illicit procurement activities in the U.S., sever military cooperation with Iran, and terminate India's participation in the development of Iran's energy sector. By taking these important steps, you can help ensure that the positive evolution of our bilateral relationship continues.

    Sincerely,

    ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN

    Ranking Member

    Committee on Foreign Affairs

    HOWARD L. BERMAN

    Member

    Committee on Foreign Affairs

    TOM LANTOS

    Chairman

    Committee on Foreign Affairs

    GARY L. ACKERMAN

    Chairman

    Subcommittee on the Middle East & South Asia

    MIKE PENCE

    Ranking Member

    Subcommittee on the Middle East & South Asia

    EDWARD R. ROYCE

    Ranking Member

    Subcommittee on Terrorism,

    Nonproliferation & Trade

    BRAD SHERMAN

    Chairman

    Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation & Trade
    It is difficult for Indians to fathom why the US, the world's oldest democracy, would want to abet and fund Pakistan, which is the world's epicentre of terrorism. It is equally baffling to note the soft peddling on Saudi Arabia, which is also one of the most repressive governments that one can imagine.

    I am astonished that these congressmen seem to think that India would cede to diktat coming from another country. Just have a look at the tone in which they almost command India to change its course.

    I think this letter will be met with scorn in Delhi. It should be treated with the contempt and disdain that it deserves.

    The congressmen quoted above may well starting fiction to supplement their wishful thinking.
    Last edited by Karthik; 06 May 07, at 06:30.
    "There is no excellence in all this world that can be separated from right living." - David Star Jordan My Blog

  2. #2
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    This letter would have the opposite result than what it aims at achieving.

    It indicates a rather short sighted vision of the world. Henry Kissinger would never approve of this letter.

    Today, China has changed from a repressive Communist regime and is bracing up to break up like USSR because the US has injected a dichotomy and an ideological schizophrenia! Consumerism has divided the population into haves and have nots. Ideal for the breaking up of a nation! Same as it happened to the USSR where Gorbachov and then Yeltsin presided over the break up of Communism and Russia as a world power!

    One has to work from within to break a nation. Not by isolationist attitudes.

    Must be one of those "with us or against us" advocates who have come to grief and dragged the mighty US along with them!

    Such silly arguments are ideal to push India back into the bear hug and into a new and dangerous axis of Russia - China - India!

    It is a pity that such unversed personage preside over the fate of the world.

    To be fair, Third world politicians are equally unversed, but then they don't preside over the fate of the world!
    Last edited by Ray; 06 May 07, at 08:35.


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  3. #3
    Military Professional 667medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Jul 05
    Posts
    905
    I don't understand something here, the Russians sell weapons to Iran and the Chinese also have a lot of Oil deals with them. Yet the Indians get bullied into severing our links with Iran. The Americans should know that India has had a long historic relation with Iran which has gor nothing to do with Ahmedinejad.

    BTW Iran used to be a vibrant democrazy under Mossadegh until the Shah Phalvi was installed by the CIA.

    I say use this as a pretext to dump the deal. It has too many conditions and clauses
    Seek Save Serve Medic

  4. #4
    Seeker of Rivendell Karthik's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Dec 04
    Posts
    402
    Yeah, these congressmen must be told in no uncertain terms that it is none of their business to meddle with India's policies and affairs.

    India should scrap this nuclear deal. The US would be the biggest loser if this deal fails to materialise.

    Nuclear energy would only account for about 25% of India's energy, and that too only by 2050. In contrast, the US would lose billions of dollars in terms of contracts.

    That letter must be thrown into the nearest looney bin.
    "There is no excellence in all this world that can be separated from right living." - David Star Jordan My Blog

  5. #5
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,624
    I thought over this after my earlier post.

    I would not react so strongly.

    While it is obvious that the Congressman is not too adept at foreign relations and foreign policy, I presume he reacted as an average jingo would react. Maybe he is under the impression that the nuclear deal is like giving India the Golden Fleece without realising the the world is now a huge market place and it is a world where money speaks and hence one can always go to another source!

    Strategically speaking, the opening up of China to the world, which incidentally was to serve business interests the world over including America, has engined China into a Frankenstein of the future. The Islamic world is alienated as it is. In this scenario, India plays an important part in the US strategic perspective of the future.

    If India is alienated, there is always the danger of entering into a dialogue with Russia and China as military partners, which will be unfortunate, and which can come to pass because the Communists are partners 'from the outside' of the current Indian govt and they will have the last laugh and say,"I told you so!".

    It is time for both side to calmly handle the issue.

    I would not take this too seriously.


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  6. #6
    Staff Emeritus Confed999's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Sep 03
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    10,026
    Everyone's dealings with tyrants should be attacked, be it India, France, the US, whoever...
    No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
    I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
    even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
    He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry

  7. #7
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Tamizhanban Senior Contributor Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,692
    GARY L. ACKERMAN
    Chairman
    Subcommittee on the Middle East & South Asia
    Wow, this guy leads the India Caucus in the congress.
    A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!

  8. #8
    Seeker of Rivendell Karthik's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Dec 04
    Posts
    402
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    I thought over this after my earlier post.

    I would not react so strongly.

    While it is obvious that the Congressman is not too adept at foreign relations and foreign policy, I presume he reacted as an average jingo would react. Maybe he is under the impression that the nuclear deal is like giving India the Golden Fleece without realising the the world is now a huge market place and it is a world where money speaks and hence one can always go to another source!

    Strategically speaking, the opening up of China to the world, which incidentally was to serve business interests the world over including America, has engined China into a Frankenstein of the future. The Islamic world is alienated as it is. In this scenario, India plays an important part in the US strategic perspective of the future.

    If India is alienated, there is always the danger of entering into a dialogue with Russia and China as military partners, which will be unfortunate, and which can come to pass because the Communists are partners 'from the outside' of the current Indian govt and they will have the last laugh and say,"I told you so!".

    It is time for both side to calmly handle the issue.

    I would not take this too seriously.
    But do you agree that these kind of myopic and misplaced ideas emanatinf from these Congressmen do little for the relationship between the two countries?
    "There is no excellence in all this world that can be separated from right living." - David Star Jordan My Blog

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Future of afghanistan
    By raja khan in forum Operation Enduring Freedom and Af-Pak
    Replies: 114
    Last Post: 23 Mar 09,, 11:09
  2. Liberals Blame America for Nick Berg's Death
    By Leader in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 20 Aug 07,, 09:30
  3. War on Iran
    By platinum786 in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 21 Apr 06,, 19:26
  4. Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council
    By Dreadnought in forum International Politics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 16 Jan 06,, 19:14
  5. Why the U.S. must withdraw from Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 04 Jan 05,, 18:20

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •