Thread: Reason for Hijab: Womens hair emits dangerous sex rays

What about the idea that even though a western raised muslim, or a middle eastern one with more of a modern individual style upbringing, may identify with the hijab as an identity marker. A bit of nationalistic rebellion against a society that rejects the hijab as a backward oddity, sugesting the wearer as one too.

Imagine yourself in a society that thinks you are backward and odd. Seems to me humans in this situation will do one of two things. reject the oddity and try to blend in with the dominant culture, or as an act of defiance and pride move even more closer to the backward odditieness. People are never more defensive of their culture as when it is being attacked.

Paul

An interesting take - Are we to understand then that Hijab does not reflect a religiosity or religious obligation, an article of faith - but a cultural enterprise in which the symbolism of rejection, exclusion and isolation is raised to such a level as to blur the distinction between political, cultural and religious and healthy from unhealthy?

OH my I have been gone for too long. If these claims are true then it would explain a lot of things like why I am so horny all the time.

Confusing to me is if these claims are true and it is necessary to cover the female form so much, how has the human society that does not employ these standards of decency continue to develop and in perspective to islamic dominated countries flourished? Also why have these countries with said standards of decency not grown into superpowers?

Originally Posted by roshan

Some excerpts from the following article: http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/op...ists/18656.htm

A circular from the Ministry of Islamic Guidance and Culture in Tehran asks TV editors to make sure that women's games are not televised live: "Images of women engaged in contests [sic] must be carefully vetted," says the letter, leaked in Tehran. "Editors must take care to prevent viewers from being confronted [sic] with uncovered parts of the female anatomy in contests." . . .

Fear of Muslim viewers seeing bare female legs and arms on television is also shared by theologians in several Arab states. Sheik Yussuf al-Qaradawi, an Egyptian theologian based in Qatar, claims that female sport is exploited as a means of undermining "divine morality."

Ayatollah Emami Kashani, one of Iran's ruling mullahs, goes further. In a recent sermon, he claimed that allowing women to compete in the Olympics was a "sign of voyeurism" on the part of the male organizers.

"The question how much of a woman's body could be seen in public is one of the two or three most important issues that have dominated theological debate in Islam for decades," says Mohsen Sahabi, a Muslim historian. "More time and energy is devoted to this issue than to economic development or scientific research. "

The Khomeinist version of the hijab, invented in the 1970s and now popular in many countries, including the United States, covers a woman's entire body but allows her face and hands to be exposed. Hijab theoreticians agree on one claim: a woman's hair emanates dangerous rays that could drive men wild with sexual lust and thus undermine social peace.

But the problem of women athletes goes deeper. Some theologians claim that any form of sporting activity by women produces "sinful consequences." In 2000, for example, the Khomeinist authorities in Tehran announced a ban on women riding bicycles or motorcycles. The rationale? Riding bicycles or motorcycles would activate a woman's thighs and legs, thus arousing "uncontrollable lustful drives" in her. And men watching women on their bikes in the streets could be "led towards dangerous urges."

The problems don't end there. According to some theologians, a woman should not be allowed to venture out of her home without a "raqib" or male guardian. But that guardian must be either her husband or her father, brother, grandfather, uncle or son.

Even if a woman is accompanied by such a "raqib" at a sporting event, the problem isn't solved. One woman's "raqib" will be a stranger to the other women playing, say, a game of volleyball. Thus any sport involving more than one woman produces complex chaperonage problems.

Last year, the Tehran Municipality presented a plan to provide sports facilities for women. . . . A model stadium was set up with 12-foot-high walls to make sure that no one could see the women from the outside. The stadium was to operate with an all-female staff, including coaches and administrators. The plan was scrapped last February, when critics claimed that the proposed stadium was located close enough to an airport that women in the stadium might be seen by men flying above them in jetliners and helicopters. . . .

The municipality still hopes to find another plot of land to build an all-female facility. "Women account for a majority of the population in this city," says Esfandiar Mashaie, Tehran deputy mayor for social affairs. "We cannot ask them to pay municipal taxes but be denied the same facilities as men simply because we fear that some men may go wild by seeing women doing sport."

At times, fear of women doing sports causes major headaches for Islamic governments. The Islamic Republic in Iran, for example, has agreed to host the Muslim Women's International badminton games next year. Although all the participating athletes have agreed to wear uniforms that cover them from head to toe, the organizers are still worried that men might sneak in to have a look at what is going on. To solve the problem, the authorities have decided to hold the games in a remote mountain resort. The only road leading to the resort will be sealed by an all-female unit of the paramilitary Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The games will be organized and supervised by exclusively female staff and recorded by an all-female TV crew.

"The place would look like a lepers' colony," says Soheila Karimi, a women-rights campaigner. "These people live on another planet and in a different epoch."

************************************************** ***********
************************************************** ***********

LOL, I wonder why the hell the stupid scientists are busy studying all sorts of things using x rays when they could investigate the Islamic "sex rays from female hair" Theory instead.

All the blame seems to fall on the women here How about the lack of control and weakness of the men?...Islam treats the women as an evil temptress but is weak in explaining the responsibility of the man to control his desire. Islam's answer is cover the women and blame her if a man should defile her.

Jesus forgave the prostitute and ask the perfect man to step foreword who would accuse her. None came foreword but all left who were ready to stone her.


IVAN