Thread: Retrial begins of BNP leaders accused of stirring racial hatred

Originally Posted by pdf27

If anyone's interested, the BNP just came third in a local council by-election where I am, with nearly 13% of the vote. Kinda scary really - it looks so harmless and middle-class around here.

I fully expect the BNP to gain an increasing share of the vote for some time to come. I would imagine that most of those who voted for them are not their supporters at all, but are so fed up with the 3 useless main parties that they are taking the opportunity to register a protest vote. If the main parties come to their senses and get back to WORKING for the good and benefit of the public, the BNP vote will melt away.

Originally Posted by pdf27

If anyone's interested, the BNP just came third in a local council by-election where I am, with nearly 13% of the vote. Kinda scary really - it looks so harmless and middle-class around here.

The BNP are right when they say the case will be a springboard for them. Perversely, them winning the case gives them legitimacy.

The problem is that the BNP will focus on their core issue. But in most of the UK race is not an issue that requires primacy over all others. Hence of the BNP win council seats they prove to be ineffectual councillors.

Originally Posted by glyn

I have a Nuclear Chemical Biological suit, a souvenir of my service days, and jolly useful when I'm painting and decorating this old house of mine! If I recall the 'rocket launchers' were the disposable bits that are discarded after a missile has been fired. They were harmless. I expect a lot of kids have them. The case has quietened down and I have heard nothing about it since, so I don't think it is as serious as some people thought. Certainly they (the BNP) are not in the same league as the poisonous clerics who were recruiting martyrs and preaching hate.

I don't claim to know much about the BNP. When government is not doing it's job flushing out the enemies of their country generally the concerned populace will have to rise to the occasion. It seems the popularity of the BNP might be in part an indication of the populace voting for action.
How could you trust bureaucrats that can't see the looming threat that Islam poses?
I must add though that the proper course would be for the current administration to act with the concerned population together to eradicate the enemy and gain back their approval, instead of waiting for the people to splinter of into subgroups.

UK Stands for UNITED Kingdom?


Ivan

[QUOTE=brokensickle;313275]

UK Stands for UNITED Kingdom?


Not really, dis-Uniting Kingdom might be more appropriate. Like some have renamed the USA as the United States of Paranoia. But remember your Shakespeare, "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet".

Originally Posted by Trooth

Closed doors have nothing to do with the principle of incitement to racial hatred. How do you define private? How do you define closed doors?

Would an indoor arena of 100,000 be a closed meeting?

Mind you i disagree with censoring these people and i don't see that really they had a case to answer here. I would prefer them to be out in the open. If the court case did anything it gave more publicity to their words and their words expose them for what they are more then muting their voices will do. Let them spew forth their hate.

Should the worldwide arena of millions of Moslems baying for Kaffir blood not be taken as non private and an equal treatment as is being done for the BNP nt be meted to them too?