Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Great Britain Austerity Cut

  1. #1
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,980

    The Great Britain Austerity Cut

    Austerity cuts will change Britain forever: press

    AFP: Austerity cuts will change Britain forever: press

    (AFP) – 14 hours ago

    LONDON — Britain's harsh austerity cuts are a watershed that will change the country forever and mark the start of a dramatic retreat by the state from its citizens' lives, newspapers said Thursday.

    Commentators were also in no doubt the 83-billion-pound (130-billion-dollar, 95-billion-euro) cuts package, unveiled Wednesday, was a huge bet with the Financial Times calling it "Britain's biggest economic gamble in a generation."

    George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer in the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition, announced the deep spending cuts which slashed budgets by around a fifth and will likely lead to the loss of half a million public sector jobs.

    They are designed to tackle a record 154.7-billion-pound deficit.

    Some observers bemoaned the risk to the economy that Osborne was taking and the deep cuts faced by the welfare system, while others praised the Conservative minister for tackling a sprawling and inefficient public sector.

    There was little disagreement on one key point, however -- Britain would undergo a dramatic transformation in the coming years.

    The Guardian saw a dark future ahead as the benefits system shrinks and the axe falls "on the sick, the poor and on working parents."

    Cuts to the welfare system were "a truly brutal concentration -- amounting to a historic resetting of the welfare state -- on those who have little."

    "A chancellor cannot take (tens of billions of pounds) out of the economy, as Mr Osborne did, without the country hurting from it. This will be a different country from now on," added the paper.

    But the Daily Telegraph heaped praise on the comprehensive spending review, as the cuts programme is known, saying it signalled that an intrusive state was at last starting to pull in its tentacles.

    The austerity measures were "an intelligent, businesslike and brave package," said the paper, adding that Osborne had "made the right call."

    It praised the minister for his efforts to rein in a "totally out of control" welfare budget and improve efficiency across the state sector.

    The cuts would shift "the balance away from the overblown and inefficient public sector created by Labour," the party in office for 13 years until they lost power in the May general election, said the Telegraph.

    The Sun tabloid declared "Osborne whacks Britain" -- but still backed the austerity measures, saying the country had the chance "to make an historic shift away from the benefits culture to work and self-reliance."

    The Independent saw the measures as part of a trend in the developed world, saying government everywhere would have to "try to do more, but do it with less.

    "But it can't. That is why these spending cuts will come to be seen as a first stage of a wider retreat."

    And it added that a decade down the line Britons would live in a world of "diminished ambitions, for politicians as for the rest of us.

    "And it starts today."

    Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  2. #2
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    The Guardian saw a dark future ahead as the benefits system shrinks and the axe falls "on the sick, the poor and on working parents."
    Geez, the Guardian is slipping. They forgot to mention the teachers, firefighters, and police...

    I suppose it's safe to predict widespread rioting in Britain too?
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

  3. #3
    Global Moderator
    Dirty Kiwi
    Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Location
    Wellington, Te Ika a Maui, Aotearoa
    Posts
    18,153
    The Tory press weighs in
    So astute had been the management of expectations in the build-up to yesterday's Comprehensive Spending Review that the immediate response to George Osborne's statement was one of relief, both because the uncertainty was finally over and because it was not quite as savage as feared. The Chancellor had two key tasks: to offer a credible plan to eradicate the deficit by the end of this parliament; and to rebalance the economy to make the public sector more efficient, while optimising the prospects for growth. Broadly, Mr Osborne succeeded in both.

    If the cuts were a little less severe than expected, they were still unprecedented in scale. The chief target was the welfare budget and its Byzantine network of means-tested benefits, from which an extra £7 billion a year in savings will have to be found, in addition to the £11 billion already identified in June's emergency Budget. This helps explain Mr Osborne's provocative – and unfair – decision during the Tory party conference to withdraw child benefit from higher-rate taxpayers (which will save £2.5 billion, more than double the Treasury's initial estimate). It gave him the political cover to make real inroads into a welfare budget that Labour, to its shame, allowed to run totally out of control. Significant savings also come from increasing the state pension age to 66 for men and women from 2020, six years earlier than planned. This is the kind of structural reform that has a big long-term impact; expect the age to be raised higher still in the decades ahead.


    other significant savings will come from slashing back-office costs and improving efficiency across the state sector. Many chancellors have ventured down this particular road with scant success; we hope Mr Osborne bucks the trend. Local authorities face a particularly tough time, but have been given far greater freedom to prioritise their own needs. The cost in jobs – about 500,000 over four years, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) – is high. Yet, as the Chancellor pointed out, with job turnover in the public sector running at about 8 per cent annually, most of those losses should come through natural wastage. More importantly, the OBR also estimates that 1.5 million new jobs will be created by a resurgent private sector over the same period, leaving a net gain of more than one million. That is not fanciful: almost 180,000 new jobs have been created in the past three months, despite the hesitant recovery.

    Mr Osborne said that this was the day Britain "stepped back from the brink" as it starts to pay off the bills from a decade of Labour debt. Yet the Chancellor was also conscious of the need to sugar the pill, for confidence is everything and the talk of austerity has been unrelenting and depressing. To this end, he found significant sums to invest in those parts of the economy that will spur economic growth. The science budget was protected, there was a handsome settlement for schools, a record investment in apprenticeships and significant spending on transport infrastructure. In time, more must be done to stimulate a real lift-off in growth, in the form of tax cuts and reductions in business red tape. Nor did Mr Osborne neglect the feelgood factor. Universal benefits for pensioners – free eye tests, prescriptions, bus passes, winter fuel payments, TV licences for the over-75s – are, we believe, hard to defend in these difficult times, yet all emerged unscathed.

    Overall, this is an intelligent, businesslike and brave package. It is also a gamble, for no one can be sure it will work. Many voices – most recently that of the Nobel economics laureate Joseph Stiglitz – have been raised in warning that the global recovery is so fragile than a new stimulus is required, not an austerity package. Mr Osborne has defied them, arguing that the later we tackle the deficit, the harder the job will be. We face four tough years; the softer option favoured by Labour offers the prospect of a decade of debt, with the deficit a drag anchor on the economy. The Chancellor has made the right call.

    For these cuts may be large, but they are manageable. Companies have gone through similar retrenchment during the recession and come through in good health and with strong balance sheets – often through smart, flexible working and cooperation between management and workers. The public sector should take note. And it is important that the cuts are kept in perspective. We are talking about 500,000 jobs lost over four years in a 30 million-job economy; and £20 billion of cuts a year out of a £1.4 trillion GDP. As the Chancellor pointed out, at the end of this process public spending will be roughly where it was just two years ago. It is important that consumers in particular appreciate this, because their confidence is vital to a sustained recovery.

    Other countries, especially the US with its paralysed political system, are looking with envy at what the Coalition is doing and wishing they could take such decisive action. The deficit crisis offers a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reconfigure the economy, shifting the balance away from the overblown and inefficient public sector created by Labour for the most cynical political purposes and towards the wealth-creating sector that is the only guarantee of long-term economic success. Mr Osborne made a good start yesterday – but there remains a very long way to go.
    In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility

    Gottfried Leibniz

  4. #4
    An t-aimiréal chléthúil Senior Contributor crooks's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 Oct 06
    Location
    Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin, again.
    Posts
    2,490
    We've tried slash and burn economics here - as the Brits will soon find, it doesn't work. Osbourne is going for plaudits from his right phlanx and the Murdoch press who hate the state rather than what makes economic and political sense: A measured reduction that won't kill the still sputtering recovery. These cuts will do nothing for job creation or economic growth bar sending it backwards with more on the dole and consequently less private sector activity, as Alan Johnson pointed out in a very articulate speech to the commons (wish we had a few of him over here!).
    Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
    - John Stuart Mill.

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Aug 08
    Location
    UK/Europe
    Posts
    2,595
    Growth 0.8% last quarter (double the forecast)... sometimes burning the forest is good for the trees but only time will tell.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 119
    Last Post: 13 Feb 11,, 02:18
  2. What if Great Britain lost ?
    By Hawg166 in forum Ancient, Medieval & Early Modern Ages
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 15 Aug 08,, 13:53
  3. Great Britain and France Declare War on USSR in 1939
    By Danowest in forum The World Wars
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08 Mar 08,, 19:53
  4. The Fall of Great Britain
    By Srirangan in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 19 Oct 06,, 03:40

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •