Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: "I just didn't make it", want to join the club?

  1. #1
    Banned jon_j_rambo's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Nov 04
    Posts
    261

    "I just didn't make it", want to join the club?

    The kid's quote is too funny,"I just didn't make it". Yes, it is that simple. Also, is it just me, or do you notice all the whacky stuff happens in Florida?

    http://www.local6.com/money/4239256/detail.html

    ORLANDO, Fla. -- Teenagers in Orlando, Fla., are leaping between 80-foot high public parking garages in a new trend called "garage jumping," according to a Local 6 News investigation.

    Local 6 News reported that the thrill seekers are vaulting themselves between garages in downtown Orlando.

    Tim Bargfrede told Local 6 News that he was following friends when he attempted to garage jump and did not make it to the other side. Bargfrede fell six stories and was knocked unconscious on impact.

    "I just didn't make it," Bargfrede said.

    Bargfrede survived the 80-foot fall but was injured.

    "The first time I came to the garage after my son's accident, I looked over and I just about broke out in tears," the boy's father Tim Bargfrede said. "I can't believe he actually survived. He looked like he was near death."


    "He (Bargfrede) is not he first person, he is not the second person, there have been four or five other individuals before him that did this," family's attorney Vincent D'Assaro said.

    The city of Orlando owns one of the downtown parking lots next to a private parking garage owned by Orlando Tower LP, according to Local 6 News.

    Orlando Parking Garage Director Samuel Vennero admitted he was aware of at least one other incident where a garage jumper didn't make it to the other side.

    "I don't think we recognized it before as a danger," Vennero said.

    There are no safety fences in place on the parking garage.

    D'Assaro is filing a lawsuit against the city of Orlando and the private garage owner for making little effort to correct a potential deadly risk.

    "There was a very, very short length of fence that was completely ineffective in preventing this from happening," D'Assaro said.

    Orlando Tower LP, the private parking lot owner, refused to comment about their responsibility, according to the report.

    Since Bargfrede fell, the City of Orlando erected a partial fence but there's still room for someone to take a dangerous dive.

    The family says that's not good enough and that both garages need to take responsibility before a garage jumper loses his life.

  2. #2
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    16,014
    D'Assaro is filing a lawsuit against the city of Orlando and the private garage owner for making little effort to correct a potential deadly risk
    Is this for real???
    What ever happened to personal responsibility??

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor bonehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Jan 05
    Posts
    4,072
    We have waaayyyy too many lawers in this country. Therefore, personal responcibility only applies when someone is accused of a crime, not when they do something stupid. Those kids were looking for Darwin awards.

  4. #4
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Unbelievable.

    Part of the settlement should be that his son is euthanized to protect passing pedestrians from his stupidity...

  5. #5
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing.

  6. #6
    Gio
    Gio is offline
    Sexual Virgin
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    927
    Quote Originally Posted by parihaka
    Is this for real???
    What ever happened to personal responsibility??
    Shhhh, don't question the Democratic establishment. =) They need those trial laywers so that the trial lawyers continue to be their biggest fundraisers.

  7. #7
    Staff Emeritus Confed999's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Sep 03
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    10,026
    Lol!
    No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
    I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
    even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
    He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry

  8. #8
    Patron Beaugeste93's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Feb 05
    Posts
    200
    A Modest Proposal

    The losing attorney (s) in a civil suit shall be put to death immediately following the trial.

    That might cut back on the lawsuits.
    Cost of ammunition expended shall be added to the court costs.

    Just a thought.
    Rule 303

  9. #9
    Staff Emeritus Confed999's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Sep 03
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    10,026
    We're going to end up having to spend a billion dollars to put up signs saying "jumping off a building may cause injury or death". Silly lawsuits brought by stupid people for doing something stupid, are stealing our money.
    No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
    I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
    even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
    He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry

  10. #10
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    16,014
    Quote Originally Posted by Beaugeste93
    A Modest Proposal

    The losing attorney (s) in a civil suit shall be put to death immediately following the trial.

    That might cut back on the lawsuits.
    Cost of ammunition expended shall be added to the court costs.

    Just a thought.
    Nah, you have to allow them the opportunity to learn. Just make it that they lose a finger each time, then when they've gone, a limb.
    That way, if you do need a lawyer, it'd be easy to find a good one.

  11. #11
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Confed999
    "jumping off a building may cause injury or death". Silly lawsuits brought by stupid people for doing something stupid, are stealing our money.
    Lol...Won't be long before some stupid kid tries sky diving without a 'chute on, and next they'll want signs on air planes "jumping from a flying plane will cause death or injury".

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  12. #12
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    "That way, if you do need a lawyer, it'd be easy to find a good one."

    LOL, the more digits the better...

  13. #13
    Staff Emeritus Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Aug 03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    10,559
    You would be surprised that the definition of "liability" is just that...a definition. Is the person with the existing structure liable, or the person who causes the accident?

    A friend of mine had an above-ground pool. She worked during the day. When she came home from work one day, there were cops, a fire truck, and an ambulance in her yard. The neighbor's 3-year old wandered into her yard, fell into her pool and drowned.

    Now you tell me....who is the responsible party? The Kid, the parents of the kid, or the woman with the pool?

    I already know we are going to get more than one answer here, so how do you determine which one is the right one?

    That is what courts are for.

  14. #14
    Dirty Kiwi Parihaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Nov 04
    Posts
    16,014
    Quote Originally Posted by Julie
    Now you tell me....who is the responsible party? The Kid, the parents of the kid, or the woman with the pool?
    Here in NZ the pool owner is responsible. By law all pools must be fenced, with vertical slats only, set height and gap between slats, and fitted with an approved child proof gate. If all these laws are adhered to then there's no fault. Child drownings in pools have plummeted since these laws were introduced.

  15. #15
    Staff Emeritus Julie's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Aug 03
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    10,559
    Quote Originally Posted by parihaka
    Here in NZ the pool owner is responsible. By law all pools must be fenced, with vertical slats only, set height and gap between slats, and fitted with an approved child proof gate. If all these laws are adhered to then there's no fault. Child drownings in pools have plummeted since these laws were introduced.
    Not a law here. However some homeowner's insurance companies require you to have a fence around a pool. Although some do not since it is not a law.

    In Georgia, all you have to do is post a "No Trespassing" sign. But, a 3-year old can't read. Try again.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Singapore sweats to make fat students thin
    By Jay in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22 Feb 05,, 12:39
  2. Indians Make the Exclusive Club in Diamonds
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29 Nov 04,, 05:18

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •