![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Scotch taster |
Quote:
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
so why you said: "It has not caught up with the fact that the Chinese have suspended deliveries of SU-27s from Russia. Maybe, they're trying to get better models but the fact remains that their numbers are now frozen for at least 3 years." These links give you clue why China cancelled the remaining SU-27 orders. China continued to assemble J11(Su-27) and now update to J11B. No matter what, the authors of the article I posted did a good job to summarize the development of China's military programmes in recent 1o years. And all the comments you bashed after that were not correct. Last edited by oneman28 : 04-26-2005 at 22:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | ||
|
Moderator
Scotch taster |
Quote:
Quote:
It's people like you who do the most damage to the PLA's reputation. You try to build them to supermen by referencing articles that just plain garbage to begin with. Did you even read that article you posted? Did you check the footnotes? I knew exactly where each article came from, especially the WT which is notoriously blue group and not above exergerating capabilities and projections. In the meantime, what the PLA is doing is impressive in its own regard. Alot of it is wrong and alot the PLA is just pushing forward for propaganda sakes and do not take seriously themselves. The best example is Unrestricted Warfare and I suggest you read that before posting anything else. In either case, CDF has earned its reputation, even in China. And must be my old age because I can no longer stand idiot wannabes. Another member of the ignore list. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Who told you that Shenyang is only doing the maintenance? We are talking about making new planes here. How could you know that numbers of SU-27 is frozen? No matter how you denounce the article, your guess about JL2 and Su-27 can only be wrong. Can you tell me where PLA is pushing for propaganda sakes by the development programmes? PLA is very low profile in the tech and programmes. Even today, you cannot find any Chinese official articles about 168, 169, 170, 171, Yuan, JL2 093, 094 programs. All of those photos were shot by military fans. I don't say PLA is superman. You said it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |||||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
or if u have doubts ask him for clarifications./explanations. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
What a funny post. From his statement, shenyang is sucked into maintenance. No time to make new ones. Hes a military expert on China.Keeping track of what happens in china has been his job. Sounds you know who and how. Why not tell us. U shud better prove him wrong with reliable info than making such a statement. or if u have doubts ask him for clarifications./explanations. He told us nothing other than saying JL2 programm was cancelled. No fact, no logic, no source. Whithout JL2, why China eds 094 that was built already. So you'd better to ask him the question. I logically prove he was wrong. Even after this long argument, he gave nothing to support his statement. What he can say is that he is running something. Who cares. even Bush was cheated about weaponary in Iraq (as reported. For fun only). Last edited by oneman28 : 04-27-2005 at 02:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
" the new ones being produced will just replace the old ones going in the factory for maintenance. Numbers cannot increase unless the maintenance cycle com[pletes(i.e. the first bird which went inside for maintenance comes out.). Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
He has a forum, I have a big Chinese website ( I don't want to post the name here), including news and forums and I am making money from it. Currently I rent two severs and have 1800G bandwith each month. Smaller than his? No kidding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
stop whining, its very simple, your sources are outdated. Its like the DF-31 parade pics you posted, just the tube with out the real missile. Photographs means squat.
There was this other guy who cilamed that China has miles and miles of underground tunnels and silos, while its good for self ego boosting, its very hard to factually prove it.
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !! |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Thanks for giving me fun. I enjoy this comments. period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
Again, for one last time, lets see if you can understand it.
Type 094 hasnt been launched yet (it means its not yet operational, its not sea worthy). JL 2 is supposedly developed for Type 094. If 094 is not ready, JL 2 will not be ready, it'll take more time, coz the boat is the launch platform. So it "may" be stopped, to match the speed with Type 094 development. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Thanks for another fun. Just like design a new transportation system for a new tank. This cannot happen in China. Enjoy your comments. Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
|
Ofcourse if the Tank is too heavy for any of your present transportation system to handle, then you defn need to. If it does not happen in china, it'll wait in the factory. Its as simple as that.
Now go post the mighty missile less tubes in your website and gloat over it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Scotch taster |
Guys,
He's a one propagandist show. You're giving him way too much attention for the bull crap he spews. It's enough to know that what he posts ain't worth squat. Just put him on the ignore list and go on. He ain't worth an ulcer. He'll learn soon enough that WAB ain't the CMF and no one here buys his crap. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top 5 Best Trained Infantry | TheGreenSmoke | Land Forces | 268 | 04-02-2008 08:07 AM |
| Iraq in Books - Review Essay | Shek | The War in Iraq | 9 | 02-29-2008 06:08 AM |
| China’s democratization and reunification | pin_qinghai | International Defense Topics | 100 | 01-06-2007 07:59 AM |
| China's Changing Military Ideology | Frank Zhou | World Affairs Board Pub | 0 | 05-03-2006 18:58 PM |
| Doctrine: Total Peoples Defense | troung | Land Forces | 17 | 07-02-2005 01:46 AM |