ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2008, 07:00 AM   #331 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
whimps
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 09:14 AM   #332 (permalink)
Deltacamelately
Military Professional
 
Deltacamelately's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-07
Posts: 648
Country:
Sir,
I just saw something that spoke of an US insistance to India for escalating military threat against PRC in 1964. I have posted that in another Tibet thread. My querry is...after the stunning setback that the Indian Army suffered in the 1962 debacle, was it militarily realistic on the USs part to expect India successfully make such an aggressive military threat against China without unexpected fallouts? Could the Indian Army possibly be a state of readiness just 2years later to do so?
__________________
I am the DARK that Rise to Kill..And Soar to Redeem!
Deltacamelately is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 10:39 AM   #333 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
Sir,
I just saw something that spoke of an US insistance to India for escalating military threat against PRC in 1964. I have posted that in another Tibet thread. My querry is...after the stunning setback that the Indian Army suffered in the 1962 debacle, was it militarily realistic on the USs part to expect India successfully make such an aggressive military threat against China without unexpected fallouts? Could the Indian Army possibly be a state of readiness just 2years later to do so?
Delta,

I dont think VK Krishna Menon allowed the IA to make any decisive support, Our biggest trump card was Indian Airforce, and the Chinese couldnt even mount proper air-challenge since their aircraft lacked range. We lost 1962 purely on politics.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 11:37 AM   #334 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
I don't think the Indian govt can give any statement on the relations of two sovereign nations except show concern.

The govt spokesman could comment in a press conference on the issue in a diplomatic way at best.

I would not know for sure since I am not too aware of the parameters on which the External Affairs Ministry functions.
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 12:04 PM   #335 (permalink)
kuku
Contributor
 
kuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-28-08
Location: delhi
Posts: 559
Country:
relations between India and Nepal are on a improving path, well at least the Industrial relations especially the hydro power sector, dont know why Nepal will be so willing to screw that up, they stand to loose a lot of already planned investment.
__________________
cheers
kuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 12:12 PM   #336 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
KUKU,

Who is the dominant power in Nepal now : Communist. That should answer your question.

Adu

Last edited by Adux : 03-26-2008 at 12:19 PM.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 12:13 PM   #337 (permalink)
kuku
Contributor
 
kuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-28-08
Location: delhi
Posts: 559
Country:
could any aggression accomplished anything more than a empty success for some months?
is it even possible to sustain a military presence across the border, during the winter any sort of significant movement of men or material across would be restricted.
kuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 12:16 PM   #338 (permalink)
kuku
Contributor
 
kuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-28-08
Location: delhi
Posts: 559
Country:
Oh yes there are no idiots greater than commie idiots.
Almost forgot that one.
kuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 12:35 PM   #339 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
Sir,
I just saw something that spoke of an US insistance to India for escalating military threat against PRC in 1964. I have posted that in another Tibet thread. My querry is...after the stunning setback that the Indian Army suffered in the 1962 debacle, was it militarily realistic on the USs part to expect India successfully make such an aggressive military threat against China without unexpected fallouts? Could the Indian Army possibly be a state of readiness just 2years later to do so?
Indian Army was undergoing a change at the moment in both mindset and technology (though nothing startlingly fabulous; in fact the FN rifle and 81mm Mortars elicited the excitement that the induction of F 16 might do today!!)

I believe the US was allowed free hand to plant surveillance devices in the Himalayas to monitor Tibet. The Khampas were also allowed to operate in Tibet or so the published material indicated.

As far as I know, the Indian Army was in no position to do anything worthwhile at the insistence of anybody.

I would be interested in knowing what you saw in the published arena. You could PM.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 12:37 PM   #340 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 25,693
Country:
Ditto!
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 18:57 PM   #341 (permalink)
Herodotus
Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-05-07
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 323
Country:
[quote=Ray;473982][quote]

No way,

They know their onions.

Communist or not, they know China's position in their destiny and they will ensure that they achieve it.

Tibet shall never be independent unless the US has some plans otherwise.

No other country can organise any freedom in Tibet.




So long as homo sapiens exist on this planet, the idea of being able to decide one's own destiny cannot be curbed.

China is an example itself. It has jettisoned Mao and Communism, no matter what homilies they spin to cover their blasphemy! They are opening up, albeit, slowly.

The internet is the Communists' biggest worry. It will corrupt the Chinese (looking at it from a Communist totalitarian mindset). Democracy will come.

QUOTE]


I am glad you are optimistic about the future General

All I will say is we will wait and see, if it happens great.
Herodotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 00:16 AM   #342 (permalink)
Herodotus
Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-05-07
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 323
Country:
What's the source on this? Stratfor? How do we know this information is reliable? It could be, but verification would be nice.

So far we have: An anonymous source says an unspecified number of Chinese in plainsclothes and carrying small guns are in Nepal.

If I were in India's government I wouldn't say anything either; too speculative.
Herodotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 00:27 AM   #343 (permalink)
ravi12
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-26-08
Location: where the aliens meet predator
Posts: 122
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
What's the source on this? Stratfor? How do we know this information is reliable? It could be, but verification would be nice.

So far we have: An anonymous source says an unspecified number of Chinese in plainsclothes and carrying small guns are in Nepal.

If I were in India's government I wouldn't say anything either; too speculative.
The Stratfor was used only for the last comment i.e. regarding chinese "displeasure"(as if it is something new) over Tibet issue in US.

Rest are sources from the newspaper's sources. Generally I find this newspaper(times of india) is alright with facts thought its opinions and psy-ops suck most of the time.

That the chinese were in plain clothes itself indicates that it was behind the scenes deal from china itself. I dont think Indian govt will officially respond in the public, but concern yes, some behind the deals from India, no (the Indian govt is simply too timid for this kind of thinking.)
ravi12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 02:15 AM   #344 (permalink)
kuku
Contributor
 
kuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-28-08
Location: delhi
Posts: 559
Country:
Quote:
The government maintained a grim silence on the major diplomatic snub inflicted by China when its foreign office summoned Indian ambassador to Beijing, Nirupama Rao, at 2am to give her a list of demonstrations that Tibetans planned to organize in India.
While this could just as well have been done during working hours, summoning the envoy in the middle of the night is seen here as nothing short of utter high-handedness by the Chinese.
That is the part that the government is expected to respond to.

They should tell the Chinese to suck it up and follow what they tell the world "its a internal matter".

May be call up the Chinese embassy for a cup of tea at 3 am, or send some of them packing for spying. or even a bomb hoax every 3 hours.

This government is very slow and timid in responding to China thats for sure, i am still waiting for the Indian Army to send the Bill for the equipment the Chinese counterparts destroyed to the Chinese embassy.
kuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 02:39 AM   #345 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kuku View Post
They should tell the Chinese to suck it up and follow what they tell the world "its a internal matter".

May be call up the Chinese embassy for a cup of tea at 3 am, or send some of them packing for spying. or even a bomb hoax every 3 hours.
Our government doesnt even act even when the chips are on our side. Whimps of the highest order, What do you expect they are all above 70.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Invasion and illegal annexation of Tibet: 1949-1951 Associate Political Discussions 146 04-16-2008 11:52 AM
Tibet wasn’t ours, says Chinese scholar lemontree Political Discussions 101 04-16-2008 05:52 AM
Karan Thapar interview with Dalai Lama Jay Political Discussions 1 04-08-2007 17:42 PM
Indian Atrocities in Held Kashmir sparten Current Affairs 213 01-04-2006 08:58 AM
Radio, TV reach administrative villages in Tibet oneman28 Political Discussions 0 10-02-2005 00:10 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8