![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Russia tests ballistic missiles
Russia tests ballistic missiles
Russia has successfully tested two intercontinental ballistic missiles that are to replace ageing rockets from the Soviet era. A strategic missile known as the RS-24 flew 7,000 km (4350 miles) to hit targets on the Kamchatka peninsula. Later, a Russian submarine in the Barents Sea launched another new missile, hitting the same test site. It comes as Russia has again accused the US of ignoring its concerns over a planned US missile defence system. Washington plans to site anti-missile facilities in central Europe, claiming that it will help defend against any possible future nuclear threat from Iran. The US missile shield system would see a radar site set up in the Czech Republic and a base in Poland for 10 missile interceptors. However, speaking in an interview to be published later this week in the Vremya Novostey daily, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said it was clear the system is aimed at deterring Russia, rather than Iran. The US has said that the limited system it proposes could not threaten Russia's own missile arsenal. The Interfax news agency reported that the RS-24, the missile tested on Tuesday, is capable of carrying at least three nuclear warheads. Russia says they are able to penetrate any kind of defensive system.
__________________
Last edited by xrough : 12-25-2007 at 23:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
" On arms of Navy fleet a rocket complex «Sineva», developed by the State rocket center (ГРЦ) « Design office of name Makeeva » (Miass, the Chelyabinsk area), have been accepted on arms on July, 9th this year. Rocket complex «Sineva» - one of perspective development of a domestic war industry. Tests of a rocket complex «Sineva» have been successfully completed in 2004, and now within the limits of state defensive order ГРЦ as the head developer of a rocket complex «Sineva» together with cooperation carries out a batch production of ballistic missiles of submarines. " Except for start-up from a nuclear submarine of strategic purpose of Northern fleet "Tula", on December, 26th RS-24 have started from the cosmodrome Plesetsk, for check of type of these rockets of ground basing. PS I hope Bulava too will be completely ready in following year.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Firral Reply
"There is no cold war. Only tests for maintenance of defense on which Russia HAS the FULL RIGHT. Or not so? Or it can only UK and the USA?"
No, no, captain. Fire away! You've every right to see if they can fly. After the missile shield's emplaced, it'll be too late. ![]()
__________________
"This aggression will not stand, man!" Jeff Lebowski |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
). Especially the "shield" is useless for rockets of sea and air basing. Besides it, bases "Missile shield" in the Europe and Japan if them will create, will be the purposes of the first impact. I think Europeans are very glad to such prospect. Thus the "shield" not panacea, sleep easy my friend. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
|
they really have to test them good, before they sell them.
nothing personal, just buisness
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Firral Reply
"Missile shield. What, it is a unpleasant thing for us, but he not in a condition to stop "retaliation" on all of 100 % at use of ground ballistic missiles..."
Yup. Said in sarcastic jest. We KNOW it couldn't prevent a Soviet (err...Russian) second strike. We've assumed that you KNOW that. Rest easy. It's as we've stated. Shouldn't even be unpleasant were it not for your leadership's superbly developed sense of paranoia. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
tankie
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Please dont be confused , ask Iran, Iraq,India ,Pakistan , Israel ,Palestine, or any other soddin country that wants to go to war for the sake of some *ucked up half baked politicians . Have a nice day ![]() Last edited by tankie : 12-27-2007 at 01:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Greatest Turkish Empires | AlpErTunga | Ancient & Medieval | 177 | 01-12-2008 07:49 AM |
| Western geopolitics today and tomorrow | JohnFlint1985 | International Defense Topics | 58 | 12-26-2007 00:15 AM |
| Russian Fears | rickusn | The Western Alliance | 26 | 11-27-2007 02:25 AM |
| Battleship Tactics | Defcon 6 | Battleships Forum | 7 | 12-07-2006 09:10 AM |
| Pak may build up to 50-110 nuclear bombs by year-end: Study | Neo | South Asian Defense Topics | 204 | 08-31-2005 11:18 AM |