ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2005, 15:22 PM   #31 (permalink)
Anoop C
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-20-05
Posts: 396
PLA medals

I haven't seen any picture of PLA soldiers/officers sporting medals. Is it a coincidence or does the PLA not reward gallantry with medals? If that is so, how is gallantry recognized?

Also, can somebody point me to the rank structure of the PLA?

On an unrelated note, US Army soldiers also do not wear their medals on their BDU, but IA officers do.
Anoop C is offline  
Old 02-19-2005, 16:01 PM   #32 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
I haven't seen any picture of PLA soldiers/officers sporting medals. Is it a coincidence or does the PLA not reward gallantry with medals? If that is so, how is gallantry recognized?
The PLA only recently re-instated the usage of medals as a performance reward. This was because during the days of the Great Proliterate Cultural Revolution, such displays were invitations to be shot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
On an unrelated note, US Army soldiers also do not wear their medals on their BDU, but IA officers do.
And give M21Sniper something to zero in on? No thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
Also, can somebody point me to the rank structure of the PLA?
Attached Images
File Type: gif PLA Ranks.gif (65.2 KB, 317 views)
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 02-19-2005, 21:00 PM   #33 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
I haven't seen any picture of PLA soldiers/officers sporting medals. Is it a coincidence or does the PLA not reward gallantry with medals? If that is so, how is gallantry recognized?

Also, can somebody point me to the rank structure of the PLA?

On an unrelated note, US Army soldiers also do not wear their medals on their BDU, but IA officers do.
I think you mean on a dress uniform, not on BDUs.

Maybe they were off duty or such, but wearing such medals during duty is invitation to death and they will quickly find themselves buddyless.
Blademaster is offline  
Old 02-19-2005, 22:54 PM   #34 (permalink)
Anoop C
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-20-05
Posts: 396
Colonel, thank you for the response. The IA discontinued the rank of 2nd Lieutenant a few years ago, but otherwise the rank structure seems similar. Is the rank of General FC an honorary one? Is the command of an Army Group given to a Lt. Gen?

I should have been more clear about IA officers wearing medals. I've seen them wear medals while in their BDUs, but not in a combat zone. The most recent example I recall is at the Indo-US joint exercise in Vairangete.

Last edited by Anoop C : 02-19-2005 at 23:01 PM.
Anoop C is offline  
Old 02-19-2005, 23:06 PM   #35 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blademaster
but wearing such medals during duty is invitation to death and they will quickly find themselves buddyless.
Actually, we will be all around him. The bad guys are aiming for his shiny medals, not us.
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 02-19-2005, 23:07 PM   #36 (permalink)
jon_j_rambo
Patron
 
jon_j_rambo's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-29-04
Posts: 277
Smart bets are on China over Taiwan. Frankly, I could careless if China waxes them.
__________________
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD" ---Amos 8:11
jon_j_rambo is offline  
Old 02-19-2005, 23:22 PM   #37 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anoop C
Colonel, thank you for the response. The IA discontinued the rank of 2nd Lieutenant a few years ago, but otherwise the rank structure seems similar. Is the rank of General FC an honorary one? Is the command of an Army Group given to a Lt. Gen?
As things stand right now, the Military Regions are an appointed command (ie, political reward). In the WZC scenario, the MR bordering on the WZ is going to be commanded by the Central Military Commision HQ, overall commanded by General Cao.
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 00:22 AM   #38 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,694
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
Actually, we will be all around him. The bad guys are aiming for his shiny medals, not us.
Good plan, but allow me to play devil's advocate here: What if said sniper is having an off-day, marksmanship-wise?
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams
TopHatter is online now  
Old 02-20-2005, 00:35 AM   #39 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Knowing M21, he won't miss.

Actually, didn't he said that he shot his bn CO so often that he bought the bde CO along just to give him somebody else to shoot at? Of course, being the wise guy, he shot them both.
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 00:38 AM   #40 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,694
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
Knowing M21, he won't miss.

Actually, didn't he said that he shot his bn CO so often that he bought the bde CO along just to give him somebody else to shoot at? Of course, being the wise guy, he shot them both.

Whoops! I had assumed a "generic" sniper, not our cuddly M21.

Um, isn't it a bad idea to frag senior officers, from a promotions board point of view?
TopHatter is online now  
Old 02-20-2005, 02:30 AM   #41 (permalink)
professional
Regular
 
professional's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-16-05
Posts: 76
CHINA , US , TAIWAN ...

Leave TAIWAN but if US and CHINA lose some of their economy( someone said 15%) , It will be good for some other countries. May the fight go long.


professional is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 04:21 AM   #42 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,149
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon_j_rambo
Smart bets are on China over Taiwan. Frankly, I could careless if China waxes them.
"He that hasteth to be rich hath an evil eye, and considereth not that poverty shall come upon him" (Proverbs 28:22).
Ray is online now  
Old 03-16-2005, 20:43 PM   #43 (permalink)
beantown05
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-16-05
Location: bean town
Posts: 8
i wouldnt doubt that we see more action sooner. and i think the US know that, Rice is going to have a addional 12,000 troops in south korea. plus the us is helping s. korea in an attack,of n korea or china.the us is having more bases in eastern asia ,slowly zoneing in on china. an other reason that action sooner is troops have a very thin line over eastern asia,but that wont last for ever. if i was china i would get n korea and russia on their side, attack taiwan now and smack them around a little teach them a lesson. but im not china, so the US better move thier ass and get more carriers and troops in eastern asia,quickly!
beantown05 is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 21:52 PM   #44 (permalink)
AAA
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-17-05
Posts: 1
Uhhhh!
Will main land China attack Taiwan?
The answer is so simple definitely NOT!
Main land'll absorb gradually this island by using economic power.
It's not in Cold War, so no one in Beijing or Washington are dare to make a bet with lives........
Instead of that they will compete in economic arena, according to geographical position, the winner'll be China.

Why don't we think these points....?

1. China gets strong support from Asia except Japan

2. China, Russia and India are having no doubt about their rights on Taiwan, Kashmir and Chechnya. According to their approach, it is so obvious that they are in trilateral understanding in separate issues. Awaiting the first trilateral summit in Vladivostok will proved this point.

3. Japan are trying to make counter balance with China and India, but its emergence as military power is very uneasy in Asia countries because of the following points.
a. Japan committed the inhumane crimes in WWII, expressed this point not
because of anathema to Japan but because of just presenting the mental situation
of Asian.
b. Dating back to recent territorial disputes with South Korea, China and Russia.
Japan is not in position to compete with China.
c. But there is another group which Japan can rely on. It is Asean. But members of
Asean are not harmonious with Japanese position. Most of the members are
scratchy with Japanese military expansions like recent deployments.

4. By concluding these points Japan cannot intervene in Taiwanese affair. Because itself is somehow unpopular in Asia.

5. Asean, a group of Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia
Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, strongly inclines to China position. Asean is one of the few groups which can feel the gravity of China and India in Asia. So, it's so clear that Asean is totally on the side of China not in the opposite side.

5. In conclusion, Taiwanese affair will happen in Asia, so the positions of Asian contries will announce who is the winner.

"IN TAWINENESE ISSUE AISA IS MAJOR AND OCCIDENTAL POWERS ARE JUST COUNTER"
AAA is offline  
Old 03-17-2005, 22:38 PM   #45 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,236
Country:
"Asean, a group of Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia
Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, strongly inclines to China position. Asean is one of the few groups which can feel the gravity of China and India in Asia. So, it's so clear that Asean is totally on the side of China not in the opposite side."

Friendly smiles often hide daggers...

---------------------

But really I don't know if its the alcohol but your post doesn't make terribly much sense...

Last edited by troung : 03-17-2005 at 22:40 PM.
troung is offline  
Closed Thread




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek oneman28 Political Discussions 7 11-28-2007 08:43 AM
China’s democratization and reunification pin_qinghai International Defense Topics 100 01-06-2007 07:59 AM
Where is Taiwan as China rises in the global IC industry? oneman28 Political Discussions 0 09-12-2005 13:58 PM
How China Will Change Your Business oneman28 Political Discussions 6 04-04-2005 12:21 PM
World Naval Rankings rickusn Naval Forces 66 03-04-2005 01:11 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:25 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8