![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
PLA medals
I haven't seen any picture of PLA soldiers/officers sporting medals. Is it a coincidence or does the PLA not reward gallantry with medals? If that is so, how is gallantry recognized?
Also, can somebody point me to the rank structure of the PLA? On an unrelated note, US Army soldiers also do not wear their medals on their BDU, but IA officers do. |
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |||
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Chimo |
|||
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Maybe they were off duty or such, but wearing such medals during duty is invitation to death and they will quickly find themselves buddyless. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Colonel, thank you for the response. The IA discontinued the rank of 2nd Lieutenant a few years ago, but otherwise the rank structure seems similar. Is the rank of General FC an honorary one? Is the command of an Army Group given to a Lt. Gen?
I should have been more clear about IA officers wearing medals. I've seen them wear medals while in their BDUs, but not in a combat zone. The most recent example I recall is at the Indo-US joint exercise in Vairangete. Last edited by Anoop C : 02-19-2005 at 23:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
Smart bets are on China over Taiwan. Frankly, I could careless if China waxes them.
__________________
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD" ---Amos 8:11 |
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader. ~John Quincy Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Whoops! I had assumed a "generic" sniper, not our cuddly M21. Um, isn't it a bad idea to frag senior officers, from a promotions board point of view? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
i wouldnt doubt that we see more action sooner. and i think the US know that, Rice is going to have a addional 12,000 troops in south korea. plus the us is helping s. korea in an attack,of n korea or china.the us is having more bases in eastern asia ,slowly zoneing in on china. an other reason that action sooner is troops have a very thin line over eastern asia,but that wont last for ever. if i was china i would get n korea and russia on their side, attack taiwan now and smack them around a little teach them a lesson. but im not china, so the US better move thier ass and get more carriers and troops in eastern asia,quickly!
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
Uhhhh!Will main land China attack Taiwan? The answer is so simple definitely NOT! Main land'll absorb gradually this island by using economic power. It's not in Cold War, so no one in Beijing or Washington are dare to make a bet with lives........ Instead of that they will compete in economic arena, according to geographical position, the winner'll be China. Why don't we think these points....? 1. China gets strong support from Asia except Japan 2. China, Russia and India are having no doubt about their rights on Taiwan, Kashmir and Chechnya. According to their approach, it is so obvious that they are in trilateral understanding in separate issues. Awaiting the first trilateral summit in Vladivostok will proved this point. 3. Japan are trying to make counter balance with China and India, but its emergence as military power is very uneasy in Asia countries because of the following points. a. Japan committed the inhumane crimes in WWII, expressed this point not because of anathema to Japan but because of just presenting the mental situation of Asian. b. Dating back to recent territorial disputes with South Korea, China and Russia. Japan is not in position to compete with China. c. But there is another group which Japan can rely on. It is Asean. But members of Asean are not harmonious with Japanese position. Most of the members are scratchy with Japanese military expansions like recent deployments. 4. By concluding these points Japan cannot intervene in Taiwanese affair. Because itself is somehow unpopular in Asia. 5. Asean, a group of Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, strongly inclines to China position. Asean is one of the few groups which can feel the gravity of China and India in Asia. So, it's so clear that Asean is totally on the side of China not in the opposite side. 5. In conclusion, Taiwanese affair will happen in Asia, so the positions of Asian contries will announce who is the winner. "IN TAWINENESE ISSUE AISA IS MAJOR AND OCCIDENTAL POWERS ARE JUST COUNTER" |
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
"Asean, a group of Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia
Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, strongly inclines to China position. Asean is one of the few groups which can feel the gravity of China and India in Asia. So, it's so clear that Asean is totally on the side of China not in the opposite side." Friendly smiles often hide daggers... --------------------- But really I don't know if its the alcohol but your post doesn't make terribly much sense... Last edited by troung : 03-17-2005 at 22:40 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 7 | 11-28-2007 08:43 AM |
| China’s democratization and reunification | pin_qinghai | International Defense Topics | 100 | 01-06-2007 07:59 AM |
| Where is Taiwan as China rises in the global IC industry? | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 0 | 09-12-2005 13:58 PM |
| How China Will Change Your Business | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 6 | 04-04-2005 12:21 PM |
| World Naval Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 66 | 03-04-2005 01:11 AM |