![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#106 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
Join Date: 05-23-06
Location: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzhou, wherever the wife drags me
Posts: 406
Country:
|
Nobody, probably. But it would be a great time for separatists in Xinjiang and Tibet to start acting up. China also has a couple of borders, especially India and Vietnam, that need to be watched all of the time. There is no way that China could focus all of its resources on Taiwan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
Join Date: 05-23-06
Location: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzhou, wherever the wife drags me
Posts: 406
Country:
|
Fair enough, but the reason that I posted that is that I get the feeling that Taiwan doesn't have the same sort of national commitment to its defense that say South Korea or Israel might have. Even with conscription lowered to 12 months now(am I right about this?), people are still avoiding it because they dont think its important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by supergreek : 01-06-2008 at 12:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Chances are, China will probably try to land in multiple areas. I don't think it'd be out of their reach to attempt an eastern shore landing along with several along the west coast. I suppose they want as many possible troops on the island in the shortest amount of time. The fact that Taiwan is so small and an island basically takes away China's numerical superiority. It more comes down to strategy, logistics, and quality. I'm not sure about current military leaders in each country, so I won't go into that. Taiwan is fighting on home soil, so they'd have the advantage of logistics. Quality, well. I think Taiwan wins in that one.
And China won't cover Taiwan in missile strikes. That would cause a hell of a lot of countries to get really mad at them. Massive civilian casualties is one thing you never want to inflict in a war nowadays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
*** sigh ***
CURRENTLY, the PLA can MAXIMUM deliver 30,000 troops within a 72 hour period. The RoCA can hit any beach 3 brigades within two hours notice. Within 24 hours, mass 100,000 troops and within 7 days, 400,000 troops. |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Taiwan centric China can be distracted in Xinjiang and Tibet.
One should think that the US is poodle-faking and toothless. Her interest in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the CAR is not merely for oil or squeezing Russia's soft underbelly! ![]()
__________________
![]() "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Sorry, I'm a tad bit unclear to whom you are referring to. You're saying the RoCA can deliver 3 brigades to any beach location within 2 hours, then have 100,000 troops there within 24 hours, then 400,000 in 7 days right? (Just clarifying. First time I read it I thought you were referring to the PLA being able to put the 100,000 troops in 24 hours and so on but then it didn't make any sense.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
At present, PLA sea lift capability to Taiwan is limited to a corps. The 15th Airborne Corps would add in another two regiments or so but would be dropped at the company level rather than battalion or regiment.
The RoCA always have 3 brigades on standby. They can react within 2 hours. The RoCA also have 3 regforce corps that are tasked for immediate defence. They would need 24 hours to properly mass at the proper locations depending on where the PLA hit. Within 7 days, the RoCA has full mobilization plans with their active reserves which is numbered at 400,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,361
Country:
|
Quote:
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Analysis: Spratly Islands | Ironduke | South Asian Defense Topics | 31 | 02-01-2008 11:54 AM |
| China, Taiwan trade barbs over failed UN bid | xrough | International Politics | 10 | 08-17-2007 13:20 PM |
| China's foot in India's door | Neo | International Politics | 29 | 07-08-2007 03:31 AM |
| New China. New crisis | Ray | Political Discussions | 15 | 02-20-2007 22:54 PM |
| Chinese Navy White Paper | rickusn | Naval Forces | 5 | 01-06-2007 12:04 PM |