ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2008, 07:07 AM   #106 (permalink)
supergreek
Regular
 
supergreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Posts: 112
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
China might appear to be bigger but can it squeeze all its resources in such a small theater? Would you like to abandon all your other borders to concentrate on a small opponent?

Taiwan only has 1 front. China has more than 1.
who would attack china if china was busy in war with taiwan.
supergreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 07:26 AM   #107 (permalink)
HKDan
Contributor
 
HKDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-23-06
Location: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzhou, wherever the wife drags me
Posts: 406
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by supergreek View Post
who would attack china if china was busy in war with taiwan.
Nobody, probably. But it would be a great time for separatists in Xinjiang and Tibet to start acting up. China also has a couple of borders, especially India and Vietnam, that need to be watched all of the time. There is no way that China could focus all of its resources on Taiwan.
HKDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 07:30 AM   #108 (permalink)
HKDan
Contributor
 
HKDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-23-06
Location: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzhou, wherever the wife drags me
Posts: 406
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
You have rich friends. Ordinary people in Taiwan don't have such an escape plan.
Fair enough, but the reason that I posted that is that I get the feeling that Taiwan doesn't have the same sort of national commitment to its defense that say South Korea or Israel might have. Even with conscription lowered to 12 months now(am I right about this?), people are still avoiding it because they dont think its important.
HKDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 07:37 AM   #109 (permalink)
supergreek
Regular
 
supergreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-07
Posts: 112
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKDan View Post
Nobody, probably. But it would be a great time for separatists in Xinjiang and Tibet to start acting up. China also has a couple of borders, especially India and Vietnam, that need to be watched all of the time. There is no way that China could focus all of its resources on Taiwan.
china does not need all of its resorces only a fraction

Last edited by supergreek : 01-06-2008 at 12:47 PM.
supergreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 12:25 PM   #110 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
100 miles of water - game, set, match to Taiwan.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 14:28 PM   #111 (permalink)
ace16807
Regular
 
ace16807's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-08
Location: TN
Posts: 77
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ace16807 Send a message via MSN to ace16807 Send a message via Yahoo to ace16807 Send a message via Skype™ to ace16807
Chances are, China will probably try to land in multiple areas. I don't think it'd be out of their reach to attempt an eastern shore landing along with several along the west coast. I suppose they want as many possible troops on the island in the shortest amount of time. The fact that Taiwan is so small and an island basically takes away China's numerical superiority. It more comes down to strategy, logistics, and quality. I'm not sure about current military leaders in each country, so I won't go into that. Taiwan is fighting on home soil, so they'd have the advantage of logistics. Quality, well. I think Taiwan wins in that one.

And China won't cover Taiwan in missile strikes. That would cause a hell of a lot of countries to get really mad at them. Massive civilian casualties is one thing you never want to inflict in a war nowadays.
ace16807 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 14:34 PM   #112 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
*** sigh ***

CURRENTLY, the PLA can MAXIMUM deliver 30,000 troops within a 72 hour period. The RoCA can hit any beach 3 brigades within two hours notice. Within 24 hours, mass 100,000 troops and within 7 days, 400,000 troops.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 14:48 PM   #113 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,136
Country:
Taiwan centric China can be distracted in Xinjiang and Tibet.

One should think that the US is poodle-faking and toothless.

Her interest in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the CAR is not merely for oil or squeezing Russia's soft underbelly!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 15:29 PM   #114 (permalink)
ace16807
Regular
 
ace16807's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-08
Location: TN
Posts: 77
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ace16807 Send a message via MSN to ace16807 Send a message via Yahoo to ace16807 Send a message via Skype™ to ace16807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
*** sigh ***

CURRENTLY, the PLA can MAXIMUM deliver 30,000 troops within a 72 hour period. The RoCA can hit any beach 3 brigades within two hours notice. Within 24 hours, mass 100,000 troops and within 7 days, 400,000 troops.
Sorry, I'm a tad bit unclear to whom you are referring to. You're saying the RoCA can deliver 3 brigades to any beach location within 2 hours, then have 100,000 troops there within 24 hours, then 400,000 in 7 days right? (Just clarifying. First time I read it I thought you were referring to the PLA being able to put the 100,000 troops in 24 hours and so on but then it didn't make any sense.)
ace16807 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 15:55 PM   #115 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
At present, PLA sea lift capability to Taiwan is limited to a corps. The 15th Airborne Corps would add in another two regiments or so but would be dropped at the company level rather than battalion or regiment.

The RoCA always have 3 brigades on standby. They can react within 2 hours. The RoCA also have 3 regforce corps that are tasked for immediate defence. They would need 24 hours to properly mass at the proper locations depending on where the PLA hit.

Within 7 days, the RoCA has full mobilization plans with their active reserves which is numbered at 400,000.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 16:07 PM   #116 (permalink)
ace16807
Regular
 
ace16807's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-08
Location: TN
Posts: 77
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ace16807 Send a message via MSN to ace16807 Send a message via Yahoo to ace16807 Send a message via Skype™ to ace16807
Do you have numbers for the RoCA's entire reserve force in general? I'm assuming in the case of a Chinese invasion, the entire reserve force would be mobilized.
ace16807 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 16:20 PM   #117 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Taiwanmilitary.org :: View Forum - Original Articles
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 17:59 PM   #118 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,361
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKDan View Post
Fair enough, but the reason that I posted that is that I get the feeling that Taiwan doesn't have the same sort of national commitment to its defense that say South Korea or Israel might have. Even with conscription lowered to 12 months now(am I right about this?), people are still avoiding it because they dont think its important.
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not quite sure. But you can bet dollars to donuts that as a society gets richer the committment of everyday citizens to a mandatory military service will get lower. We are observing that trend in Israel. People are less tolerant now when the military wants to requisition their trucks and SUVs for official duty. Given a few more years, you might see you Israelis escape the country to avoid the draft.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 18:05 PM   #119 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 2,006
Country:
How about this: how will the CCP's domestic fortunes fare during and after a fight? Or is this not answerable without discussing the lead-up scenario?
__________________
HD Ready?
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 22:31 PM   #120 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
If they win, nothing. If not, Tienamen Square would look like a walk in the park.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis: Spratly Islands Ironduke South Asian Defense Topics 31 02-01-2008 11:54 AM
China, Taiwan trade barbs over failed UN bid xrough International Politics 10 08-17-2007 13:20 PM
China's foot in India's door Neo International Politics 29 07-08-2007 03:31 AM
New China. New crisis Ray Political Discussions 15 02-20-2007 22:54 PM
Chinese Navy White Paper rickusn Naval Forces 5 01-06-2007 12:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:37 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8