ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2007, 23:44 PM   #31 (permalink)
wp2000
Banished
 
Join Date: 12-02-06
Posts: 48
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
I don't think the DDP is bluffing. They know the Americans will come in even if they are the ones who provoked it.
Well,it seems that DPP just want to fight to the last US soldier.

Although they have been so up beat about independance, once they are in the government, they cut the defense budget in the first 4 years, then suddenly put a huge military purchase plan to the opposition party, which in my view is designed to be boycotted by the opposition so that they can play the blame game again.

That's why I say they are bluffing.

If they are half serious about independance, they should quadriple the defense budget and do whatever it takes to strengthen Taiwan's fighting capability down to every man and boy.

But they did nothing other than BSing with the oppostion party. Not only they want US to fight for their independance, it seems that they don't even want to pay for it.

That's why I think it's so funny.
wp2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:46 PM   #32 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Then why the UN seat drive? Why draw an angry response not only from Beijing but from Washington?
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:52 PM   #33 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Is Taiwan really a nation? Tibet, and Vietnam were more or less buffer zones for China, and have always been under the influence. India is a totally seperate culture(s) and a totally seperate people(s). China has never claimed India. Taiwan is a different issue. Most of the people in Taiwan are from China, or descendents of people who came from China. Chinese culture runs deep there. China, both under the Nationalist government and the CCP government, claim Taiwan as a part of China. Only the Taiwan independence movement want Taiwan to be seperate.

If you restrict the geographical area to Taiwan only, then you can say more people want Taiwan to be independent. But if you include China, then more people want Taiwan to stay with China. I'm all for democracy but where do we draw the line?

There is a saying that India influenced China profoundly, without even sending a soldier across its border.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 00:19 AM   #34 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,591
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Also is the Chinese navy capable of blockading Taiwan?
And what if the USN is escorting a convoy of supplies to Taiwan?

If there are only 2 countries in this fight, China may be able to blockade Taiwan. At least engage in a war of attrition. However, the world relies on China's cheap manufacturing capacity and Taiwan's high tech industry. The world will not sit by when China attacks Taiwan.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 00:20 AM   #35 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,591
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adux View Post
There is a saying that India influenced China profoundly, without even sending a soldier across its border.
Oh of course. Buddhism came from India. India has a profound influence on China. But China has never claimed India as a part of China. It has over Tibet, Mongolia, and certainly Taiwan.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 02:16 AM   #36 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
What's the point? The RoCAF can more than hold off the PLAAF while maintaining life as usual on the island.
The point would be to make the RoCAF take casualties, hoping that they'll run out of aircraft first.

Quote:
Only if no one was willing to run the blockade ... and you can bet the RoCN is more than willing to go sub hunting.
So realistically the anwser is no. Would Taiwan be able to purchase additional aircraft abroad fast enough to use them in the even of a Chinese attack?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 03:52 AM   #37 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,591
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
The point would be to make the RoCAF take casualties, hoping that they'll run out of aircraft first.



So realistically the anwser is no. Would Taiwan be able to purchase additional aircraft abroad fast enough to use them in the even of a Chinese attack?
Well, the US can always transfer a few dozen F-16s from current active fleet, maybe a war time lease. And then activate a few dozen from mothball to take their places in the inventory. We have thousands of F-16s in mothball.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 05:23 AM   #38 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,662
Country:
Quote:
I think China will win the war, because Taiwan is an inalienable part of China...
That's not a reason. You could call it a motivation.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 05:24 AM   #39 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,662
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Well, the US can always transfer a few dozen F-16s from current active fleet, maybe a war time lease. And then activate a few dozen from mothball to take their places in the inventory. We have thousands of F-16s in mothball.
The US probably has more mothballed military equipment that the rest of the entire world has in service.
Ironduke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 05:47 AM   #40 (permalink)
HKDan
Contributor
 
HKDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-23-06
Location: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzhou, wherever the wife drags me
Posts: 386
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
And what if the USN is escorting a convoy of supplies to Taiwan?

If there are only 2 countries in this fight, China may be able to blockade Taiwan. At least engage in a war of attrition. However, the world relies on China's cheap manufacturing capacity and Taiwan's high tech industry. The world will not sit by when China attacks Taiwan.
I even question whether China could effectively put a naval blockade on Taiwan. The Taiwanese Navy is more than capable of coming out and giving the Chinese a fight. The Taiwanese have a very real weakness in submarines, but their surface fleet is not inferior to what the PLAN could put together for a blockade. I suspect that the Taiwanese are probably better trained too.
HKDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 06:09 AM   #41 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
That's not a reason. You could call it a motivation.
No. You don't get it. It was semantics Since both sides ARE China . . . . . . China wins.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
The US probably has more mothballed military equipment that the rest of the entire world has in service.
Really? More then the old Soviet arsenals?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 08:05 AM   #42 (permalink)
wp2000
Banished
 
Join Date: 12-02-06
Posts: 48
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Then why the UN seat drive? Why draw an angry response not only from Beijing but from Washington?
No matter what reason is behind all these moves, don't you agree it's funny?
wp2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 08:51 AM   #43 (permalink)
VarSity
Contributor
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Leicester
Posts: 397
Country:
Isnt Taiwan a very mountainous place (especially the West coast)? Would this not prove the be a great advantage to the defenders?
VarSity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 09:15 AM   #44 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
The point would be to make the RoCAF take casualties, hoping that they'll run out of aircraft first.
And that will only work if the PLAAF and the PLANAF sends out their best and they will lose their equal share of their best which leaves a whole bunch of jalopies that have not even left the sight of land.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
So realistically the anwser is no. Would Taiwan be able to purchase additional aircraft abroad fast enough to use them in the even of a Chinese attack?
Possibly not but then, the Mainland Chinese would also have nothing to fly over the skies of Taiwan.
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 09:16 AM   #45 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarSity View Post
Isnt Taiwan a very mountainous place (especially the West coast)? Would this not prove the be a great advantage to the defenders?
Taiwan is divided into 3 Areas stretching from North to South. If you have seen what they've done to the beaches, D-Day was a cake walk in comparison.
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis: Spratly Islands Ironduke South Asian Defense Topics 31 02-01-2008 11:54 AM
China, Taiwan trade barbs over failed UN bid xrough International Politics 10 08-17-2007 13:20 PM
China's foot in India's door Neo International Politics 29 07-08-2007 03:31 AM
New China. New crisis Ray Political Discussions 15 02-20-2007 22:54 PM
Chinese Navy White Paper rickusn Naval Forces 5 01-06-2007 12:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8