ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2008, 21:23 PM   #211 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
New member, you might want to make an introductory thread about yourself in the Introductions forum.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 23:09 PM   #212 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,946
Country:
beansprout,

might want to head over to the welcome board, and introduce yourself first!

but to answer your post- the KMT of the old days would have disagreed wholeheartedly with that assertion. even when they fled to TW, they had representatives from mongolia and tibet waiting for the of course inevitable day when they retook the mainland.
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present.

-Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
astralis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 04:13 AM   #213 (permalink)
cuba
Regular
 
cuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Posts: 74
Going back to the China vs. Taiwan debate. I was reading an article - which was of course a Pentagon publication [2006] and, therefore, may be full of bias - which suggests that China would not be able to take the island as easily as you may think.

These are the main reasons (which are of course debatable):
1. A lot of China's military technology is soviet technology and the rate of retiring it will exceed the rate of acquiring new hardware.
2. Their guided missile's aren't completely accurate
3. They do not have enough amphibious vessels to successfully launch an invasion and/or enforce a blockade.

Disclaimer: obviously there are experts on this forum who can shed light on this argument and these ideas may well be partial.
cuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 05:31 AM   #214 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,377
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuba View Post
Going back to the China vs. Taiwan debate. I was reading an article - which was of course a Pentagon publication [2006] and, therefore, may be full of bias - which suggests that China would not be able to take the island as easily as you may think.

These are the main reasons (which are of course debatable):
1. A lot of China's military technology is soviet technology and the rate of retiring it will exceed the rate of acquiring new hardware.
2. Their guided missile's aren't completely accurate
3. They do not have enough amphibious vessels to successfully launch an invasion and/or enforce a blockade.

Disclaimer: obviously there are experts on this forum who can shed light on this argument and these ideas may well be partial.
Most people on this forum do not believe China can easily take Taiwan. Only the ultra nationalist Chinese do. After looking through posts by people who are versed in logistics and avid China watchers, I've changed my opinion from "China could do it" to "China might be able to do it in 50 years."
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 08:20 AM   #215 (permalink)
cuba
Regular
 
cuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Posts: 74
That's good to know. Or is it?

I just found this topic and could not read every single page of posts in this topic.
cuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 13:45 PM   #216 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuba View Post
Going back to the China vs. Taiwan debate. I was reading an article - which was of course a Pentagon publication [2006] and, therefore, may be full of bias - which suggests that China would not be able to take the island as easily as you may think.

These are the main reasons (which are of course debatable):
1. A lot of China's military technology is soviet technology and the rate of retiring it will exceed the rate of acquiring new hardware.
2. Their guided missile's aren't completely accurate
3. They do not have enough amphibious vessels to successfully launch an invasion and/or enforce a blockade.

Disclaimer: obviously there are experts on this forum who can shed light on this argument and these ideas may well be partial.
let's just go through your point.
1. In general, when newer technology comes in, there are less of them. For example, compare the number of F-22 and F-15.
2. I'm not sure which guided missiles you are talking about. Maybe you want to check up on their collection for ground attack weapons.
3. They certainly have enough to enforce a blockade if USN doesn't get involved.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 01:05 AM   #217 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
3. They certainly have enough to enforce a blockade if USN doesn't get involved.
You forgot Japan.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 01:26 AM   #218 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
3. They certainly have enough to enforce a blockade if USN doesn't get involved.
So the US/Japan/South Korea/everyone else is just going to sit by as their ships are stopped or sunk by a Chinese blockade?
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 04:00 AM   #219 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,802
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
3. They certainly have enough to enforce a blockade if USN doesn't get involved.
I don't see how China can possibly enforce a blockade in the sea to the east of Taiwan... Taiwan would have clear air superiority in that region.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 07:34 AM   #220 (permalink)
cuba
Regular
 
cuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Posts: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
let's just go through your point.
1. In general, when newer technology comes in, there are less of them. For example, compare the number of F-22 and F-15.
2. I'm not sure which guided missiles you are talking about. Maybe you want to check up on their collection for ground attack weapons.
3. They certainly have enough to enforce a blockade if USN doesn't get involved.
Remember, it's not my point it's the point made in the paper i read. Thank heaven's for the disclaimer.

I thought that the US are already involved, supplying Taiwan with plenty of weapons.
cuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 18:48 PM   #221 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
I don't see how China can possibly enforce a blockade in the sea to the east of Taiwan... Taiwan would have clear air superiority in that region.
Also true, and it would merely need to contest airspace to make a blockade impractical.
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 03:43 AM   #222 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,802
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwarmonger View Post
Also true, and it would merely need to contest airspace to make a blockade impractical.
I find it exasperating that people who talk about how China can so easily take Taiwan cannot even comprehend this basic fact. China cannot impose a blockade on Taiwan.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:03 AM   #223 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,377
Country:
Well, a blockade has to have the threat of force to back it up. Simply saying "I am blockading this island" doesn't do a lot of good until I can sink a few ships trying to go through the line. China certainly can sink a few merchant ships going to Taiwan. The problem is that's pretty much a declaration of war against the owner of the vessle. China's blockade force will be destroyed in short order and traffic will resume. And the world will be quite annoyed at the bruhaha.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 20:35 PM   #224 (permalink)
xinhui
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-06
Posts: 651
Here is an interesting note I just ran into.

One of two daughters KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou decided to live in Beijing instead of Taipei.

ROC presidential debates are so much fun to monitor and I am having a blast.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ma1201785521_29541.jpg (14.9 KB, 55 views)
File Type: jpg Ma1201785521_52152.jpg (20.3 KB, 55 views)

Last edited by xinhui : 01-31-2008 at 20:50 PM.
xinhui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 22:25 PM   #225 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
You forgot Japan.
right, I mean, rocn alone.

Quote:
I don't see how China can possibly enforce a blockade in the sea to the east of Taiwan... Taiwan would have clear air superiority in that region.
well, I'm sure ROCAF would be busy fighting on the other side. We can get in a debate on how much force ROCAF have to launch against blocking PLAN ships, but that will probably never end.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis: Spratly Islands Ironduke South Asian Defense Topics 31 02-01-2008 11:54 AM
China, Taiwan trade barbs over failed UN bid xrough International Politics 10 08-17-2007 13:20 PM
China's foot in India's door Neo International Politics 29 07-08-2007 03:31 AM
New China. New crisis Ray Political Discussions 15 02-20-2007 22:54 PM
Chinese Navy White Paper rickusn Naval Forces 5 01-06-2007 12:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:17 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8