![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Scotch taster |
I would not read too much in the 31GA. These are showcase exercises. Nothing is allowed to go wrong. And the PLA will want to show what they can do best; not come up embarrassing short when compared to their Russian counterparts and both the 38 and 39GAs do come up short when compared to their Russian Guards Divisions.
Essentially these are infantry shows with a few high tech toys thrown in. Air drops and amphib landings don't need that much high tech and co-ordination. Just be at the right place at the right time. I note the Russian praise of the last exercise. "Iron discipline" does not denote flexibility and the TW scenario will demand flexibility like no other. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
But has China developed any real over the horizon amphib capability? I have sene pics of a new surfing IFV (may have been photoshopped) similar to the USMC EFV, China is also a world leader in WiGV technology. So China has the technological base to build an invasion force, but is she to any real degree?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
Quote:
well I avoided mentoning the airborne for a reason. With out a true OTH ampib force China cannot clear the missile firing shores of Taiwan enough to allow heavier follow forces in older style "LCA/LST" type craft to operate. Last I knew the PLA/PLAN amphib capability was almost ideal for power projection in the Spratly Islands (Vietnam Phillipnes etc) but vs the RoC would be sittign ducks. Unless China can build a corps sized formation capable of rapid transport across the straits with OTH landing capability Taiwan is safe from anything but bombardment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
A corps sized formation would change the defensive equasion for Taiwan. it might not be enough to take the Island, but its enough to take part of it. The RoCA is woefully under equipped with modern weapons. Thier Brave Tiger tank is a rebuilt M-48/M-60 Patton clone.
I know China has civillian WiG viehicles, has developed a surfing IFV and is working on an improved attack helo capability, but all are still in small numbers. I wont claim to be a PLA watcher by any means. But I am kinda keeping an eye on China's amphib technology. and the peaces are there but not the numbers. However if China starts practcing OTH ampib ops it could signal oprational testing of a new doctrine prior to investment in force construction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
This is an interesting report Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Found some scary articles while researching the military training ground:
Article One-"During the Soviet industrialization of the 1930s, Chelyabinsk experienced a fast growth. Several industrial establishments, including the Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant and the Chelyabinsk Metallurgical Plant, were built at this time. During World War II, Joseph Stalin decided to move a large part of Soviet factory production to places out of the way of the advancing German armies in late 1941. This brought new industries and thousands of workers to Chelyabinsk—still essentially a small city. Several enormous facilities for the production of T-34 tanks and Katyusha rocket launchers existed in Chelyabinsk, which became known as "Tankograd" (Tank City). Chelyabinsk was built essentially from scratch at this time. A small town existed before this, signs of which can be found in the centre of the city. The S.M. Kirov Factory no. 185 moved here from Leningrad to produce heavy tanks—it was transferred to Omsk after 1962. One of the Chelyabinsk theatresA serious nuclear accident in 1957 at the Mayak nuclear fuel reprocessing plant, 150 km north-west of the city, caused deaths in Chelyabinsk Oblast but not in the city...The Mayak plant is associated with two other major nuclear accidents. The first occurred as a result of heavy rains causing a lake polluted with radioactive wastes to overflow into the Techa river, the second occurred when wind spread dust from the bottom of Lake Karachay, a dried-up radioactively polluted lake, over parts of Ozersk." Article Two- A movie review about a documantary. see the follwing link CHELYABINSK "The Most Contaminated Spot on the Planet" - a documentary film by Slawomir Grunberg - Log In Productions - distributed by LogTV LTD. I am wondering if the Chinese troop should bring their NBC equipments with them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Lei Feng Protege
Defense Professional
|
random muse...........
If one asks me what is PLA's weakness, I can't tell them, there are too many to count! At the same time, there are many things the Russians are very good at, few examples are: Mechicanized Airborne Operation, Attack Chopper Operation, CAP If the glass half full, PLA is sending their youngest service arms to Russia and in the progress embarrassing themselves in public but they might learn a thing or two. Attack Chopper Operation: They are sending 38th GA LH, with its regiment commander Sun Fengyang, the leading figure in Attack chopper operations and a strong voice for a greater role for the LH, PLAdaily gave him an entire special session to vent. Ken Allen told me that he is very impressed with this guy. Mech Airborne operation: This new PLAAF service arm only come to light 3 years ago before that all they had was buggies. those airborne jeep entered service in 2002, still very new to PLAAF. CAP: Many argue PLAAF still don't get it. But, they are sending their JH-7 and unlike its PLANAF counter part, those JH-7a are not loaded with ASCM like that of K-802, they are armed with rockets, iron bombs, and PGM. If PLA wants to show off, they would do a few Kungfu matches instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Analysis: Spratly Islands | Ironduke | South Asian Defense Topics | 31 | 02-01-2008 11:54 AM |
| Articles and links for the Military Professional | Officer of Engineers | The Staff College | 115 | 11-20-2006 11:28 AM |
| Guerilla Warfare | troung | The Staff College | 13 | 04-05-2006 02:25 AM |
| Where is Taiwan as China rises in the global IC industry? | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 0 | 09-12-2005 13:58 PM |
| Analysis: Chechnya | Ironduke | The Western Alliance | 1 | 05-07-2004 10:36 AM |