![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#151 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Let me see if I'm getting this right. So only a fraction of those 2000 sorties per day were conducted with the aim of grounding the Iraqi Air Force? The rest were against ground troops, supply lines, SEAD, etc?
What to make of this? CHINA HAS DEPLOYED 980 MISSILES AGAINST TAIWAN Trying to find a copy of what Bernard Cole actually said. Last edited by lazybastard : 04-30-2007 at 11:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
You don't kill an airbase by filling its runways with craters. You kill an airbase by killing the engineers who are filling those craters and the Allies did just that. They went back to kill those engineers a minimum of four times before the ground war began.
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
#153 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,209
Country:
|
Quote:
Landing a few thousand men is one thing, keeping them combat capable and effective throughout the campaign is quite another.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Let me explain. I've been observing for over a few years now that the PLA has pioneered the usage of ballastic missile salvos in volleys of 3-5 missiles per volley. Now depending on the target, that's a total of 200-400 sorties. That is way too few of numbers for a concentrated attack to take out the RoCAF ... unless they have real time intel of where their targets are ... meaning a FOO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
What sealift they have isn't enough for a successful landing yet, that doesn't mean they are not buying more as fast as the budget allow
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 (permalink) |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
OoE, do the Chinese missiles (2RF)have that good of a CEP? Seems to me cruise missiles offe a beter strike capability, Taiwan won't see them coming and so can be used for airfeild denial and to hit radar appatures, phone exchanges, then the ballistics hit C4Si infomation systems and other targets in pursuit of the Chicoms goals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
The M9/M11 missiles are advertised to have less than 100 metres CEP. I think there is alot of internal PLA politics involved as to why they went with ballastic missiles rather than cruise missiles (though they are slowly acquiring those but nowhere near the speed of their BM batteries).
Originally, the 2nd Artillery Force (2AF) was the nuclear strike arm of the PLA. Only problem is that they don't own the nukes. The nukes belong to the Central Military Commission and are stored at a CMC location away from their delivery vehicles and under CMC guard. I know the 2AF has been so frustrated, even during exercise, in trying to get some sort of nuclear release mechanism in place that they went the conventional explosive route but still required to maintain the nuclear option because of their original mandate. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 7 | 11-28-2007 08:43 AM |
| China’s democratization and reunification | pin_qinghai | International Defense Topics | 100 | 01-06-2007 07:59 AM |
| PLAN Analysis | rickusn | Naval Forces | 9 | 06-12-2006 15:05 PM |
| China's Changing Military Ideology | Frank Zhou | World Affairs Board Pub | 0 | 05-03-2006 18:58 PM |
| World Naval Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 66 | 03-04-2005 01:11 AM |