ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2007, 19:58 PM   #16 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,691
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFirst View Post
Of course, America is a great and rich country. But to send an aircraft carrier just "to rattle" is too prodigally even for it. imho
USN carrier strike groups routinely deploy around the world, simply as a matter of course.

There is very little ocean area that is not covered - or can be covered relatively quickly - by a carrier.

There's nothing prodigal about a nation's warships cruising in international waters.

If you are a law-abiding country, then you really have nothing to fear and a lot to be happy about if a US CSG is in your neighborhood...especially if a tsunami or other natural or manmade disaster should befall you.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2007, 20:12 PM   #17 (permalink)
xrough
Contributor
 
xrough's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-08-07
Location: Manila
Posts: 746
Country:
I would like to ask how many carriers does US possess?and where are they positioned?
xrough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2007, 20:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,691
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrough View Post
I would like to ask how many carriers does US possess?and where are they positioned?
The USN currently has 10 nuclear-powered supercarriers, one of which is in long-term overhaul and refuelling.

There are an additional 2 conventionally-powered supercarriers as well.

As for where they are positioned, the answer is anywhere and everywhere.

They are homeported on both coasts of the United States, and 1 carrier is permanently homeported in Japan.

This image is somewhat out of date, but it gives you an idea of the worldwide carrier strength of all nations.
Attached Images
File Type: gif carriers.gif (125.9 KB, 51 views)
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2007, 14:41 PM   #19 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,318
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
The USN currently has 10 nuclear-powered supercarriers, one of which is in long-term overhaul and refuelling.

There are an additional 2 conventionally-powered supercarriers as well.

As for where they are positioned, the answer is anywhere and everywhere.

They are homeported on both coasts of the United States, and 1 carrier is permanently homeported in Japan.

This image is somewhat out of date, but it gives you an idea of the worldwide carrier strength of all nations.

One note of fun TH...If I could shrink the picture down I have a pic of PNSY in the 80's. Note this is a very small reserve fleet. However the pic would show 2(BB's) 1(CV) 1(Sm CV) 12(DD's) 1(CA) 1(FF) and various other escorts. all in the small reserve. This "small" reserve is more firepower then most countries Navy's can even field at one given time. And this is only one small reserve.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2007, 17:52 PM   #20 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
One note of fun TH...If I could shrink the picture down I have a pic of PNSY in the 80's. Note this is a very small reserve fleet. However the pic would show 2(BB's) 1(CV) 1(Sm CV) 12(DD's) 1(CA) 1(FF) and various other escorts. all in the small reserve. This "small" reserve is more firepower then most countries Navy's can even field at one given time. And this is only one small reserve.
True. I can remember as a child crossing IK Brunels famous Tamar suspension bridge and there were countless grey painted battleships, aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, submarines and sundry other craft on both sides, as far as the eye could see. Today our once proud navy has been cut to the bone and it is but a shadow of its former self.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 14:58 PM   #21 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Empire of Evil
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
USN carrier strike groups routinely deploy around the world, simply as a matter of course.

There is very little ocean area that is not covered - or can be covered relatively quickly - by a carrier.

There's nothing prodigal about a nation's warships cruising in international waters.

If you are a law-abiding country, then you really have nothing to fear and a lot to be happy about if a US CSG is in your neighborhood...especially if a tsunami or other natural or manmade disaster should befall you.
I think you are not absolutely right. In comparison with ocean area the aircraft combat range deployed on a carrier is not so big. Even if there was any reason to cover the ocean area. Virtually all possible targets for aircraft carriers are on a land, but not in ocean.
To rattle the every dictator in the world by an aircraft carrier…I really doubt… And especially considering there is no oil in Northern Korea...
This is necessary to spend some weeks or months for repair and other preparations to drive a carrier to blue-water. And several escort ships with it. And ground-based aircraft along carrier's way - reconnaissance and anti-submarine…
Too much time, too much money are needed.

Last edited by MrFirst : 01-13-2007 at 16:14 PM.
MrFirst is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 15:27 PM   #22 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrough View Post
I would like to ask how many carriers does US possess?and where are they positioned?
xrough- If you are interested in more info on US carriers and USN force structure - You might want to check out this thread.

A closer look at USN Fleet Structure

The information provided by RickUSN should answer most of your questions.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2007, 02:26 AM   #23 (permalink)
xrough
Contributor
 
xrough's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-08-07
Location: Manila
Posts: 746
Country:
It is really expensive to envolve in such scenario but the US-the world's richest country have all the resources to do it..

Tnx highsea..honestly, I haven't seen any carrier yet (since we don't have carrier in our country)..lol
xrough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2007, 16:20 PM   #24 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,318
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFirst View Post
Of course, America is a great and rich country. But to send an aircraft carrier just "to rattle" is too prodigally even for it. imho
Your right MyFirst in my days we would have sent another great arbitrator representative of the United States. An Iowa class battleship!
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. speeds attack plans for North Korea Ray International Defense Topics 74 01-09-2007 13:19 PM
N Korea to open talks with South Ironduke Political Discussions 1 05-14-2005 16:25 PM
Official: N. Korea Capable Of Firing Nuke At Usa... illusha Current Affairs 7 04-30-2005 13:05 PM
No F-16 fighter planes for Pakistan: Blackwill Ray Military Aviation 23 12-17-2004 19:45 PM
Su-30 Versus RAAF alternatives lulldapull Military Aviation 59 12-09-2004 18:16 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:39 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8