![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
South China Sea.
For a number of years now, China has been working hard and somewhat managed to pull the US from the South East Asia, where it has its biggest claims, namely the whole South China Sea (SCS).
The idea is a long term work of isolation of each country bordeing the sea. For that, several directions:
The isolation is working well. That plus the two-sided agreements, the contenders dealed one-by-one will have no choice but wait for their turn. This way, China can go and secure the whole SCS pretty easily, up to Malacca. I believe the isolation of Taiwan and Japan are part of the game too. By closing the straight, Taiwan will starve, and Japan has no choice but go all the way around. One sigle aircraft carrier may be more then useful to maintain air superiority agaisnt small countries (what can Malaysia do against 20/30 Su-33 with her handful of SH that barely fly?). I believe that China has noway today but to go to war. And a vision of China ranging from Aseh to Kyushu is not a only dream. Problem is: How to deal with: 1- Singapore (but the chinese diaspora represents 80% of the population) 2- Skorea (fielding a new and puwerful projection tool) 3- Japan (presently can't be threaten by china) The answer for the two seconds is: asphixy. Prevent the air from coming in. They will have to attack, and will be the bads. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
The irony is that 600 years ago it was the protection afforded by Admiral Zheng He and his Treasure Fleet against the regional powers of Ayudedya and Majapahit that gave rise to the Malaccan Sultanate (from which modern Malaysia traces it genesis). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Yes, Singapore is largely ethnic Chinese, but you're kidding yourself if you think they'd ever be willing to accept the PRC forcing control of SE Asia. And you forget one thing, and that is that 1 CV is probably more of a liability than an asset, since the PLA would have to call off all its operations if this single carrier was damaged (not hard, you can take out the elevators, the conning tower, punch a few holes in the flight deck, wreck the catapults), let alone destoryed. It'll take more than building the carrier to make the PLA-N a true regional force, they're gonna need the large fleet of escorts and support ships, they're going to need to train the flightcrews, not to mention the engineers, defence gunners and deck crews and technitians to operate the thing, they're going to need to specialist aircraft, and most importantly, they're going to need to work out how to operate all these things in sync effectively. In short, carriers are a ***** of a thing to have to actually use, and thats why the PLA doesn't have one yet.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
Join Date: 05-23-06
Location: Hong Kong, Shanghai, Hangzhou, wherever the wife drags me
Posts: 406
Country:
|
Francois,
I have to disagree with your assertion here. While it is true that the PLAN is putting some serious effort into becoming a force to be reconed with, they still have a long way to go before they can reach parity with the JSDF, much less the USN. The idea of them making any serious attempt to close the Straights of Malacca is crazy talk. They simply are not at that stage of development yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Malays has a lot of problems making flying their few planes. And they lack good pilots, and they are too spread over the country.
And I am not sure the Scorpenes will be good for a long time. Please notice that ALL PLA-N's big boats (amphibs too) and best subs are in this area, not in front of Taiwan or Japan. So, the showing finger at the East while they prepare solely the West. The first row of the game is to take the Spratleys. So as I see it, they make actions, punctually, like they already did against Vietnam, but on a larger scale. When it is done, go further ahead. They need to secure the inner sea and the SLOCs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
And then you have the USA to consider. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Yes you are right.
Today Singapore is completly secured, and Malaysia is also so far. But I have echoes from co-workers in KL that China is really pushing hard diplomatically on them the pull away from the West. The reasons several western countries (US/UK/EU/AUST) are involving themselves more and more just makes me belive even more that the scenario is not that remote actually. The past of China and its habits to take a country and then ask outsiders to shut-up because these are internal problems, makes me (and others for the matter) doubt of the "pacific" stance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
The PLA-N just doesn't have the capability to project enough power this far out to be avoid taking a beating from the combination of Australian, Thai, Malaysian, Singaporian, Philipino forces, and that doesn't take into account any American, European or British units stationed in the area, or whomever is around that might be prepared to help (Japan, Korea, maybe India) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quite true remarks from you both, and thank you for that.
But again, I don't situate the action in this decenie or even the next. I didn't put any time frame. This is just a trend that appears when analysing the mil and political orientations of the PRC. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
|
Its not just a naval issue, the Philipines does have an experienced if not overly well equipped army, with US help they could bring this into play to assist any neighbour invaded by the PLA. And I wasn't exactly being scientific, I was just trying to demonstrate that SE Asia is no cake-walk.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Analysis: Spratly Islands | Ironduke | South Asian Defense Topics | 31 | 02-01-2008 11:54 AM |
| New China. New crisis | Ray | Political Discussions | 15 | 02-20-2007 22:54 PM |
| Africa: 'Who's Afraid of China in Africa?' | troung | International Defense Topics | 0 | 12-16-2006 23:22 PM |
| China Plans for World Domination | agent09 | Political Discussions | 0 | 05-08-2005 20:06 PM |
| How China Will Change Your Business | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 6 | 04-04-2005 12:21 PM |