ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-24-2006, 08:16 AM   #61 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
And yet Kim didn't get the hint.
I'm not sure we've got the hint. During that ex, we've been saying it was for Taiwan. Now, looking back and further reading the 39GA's training, they may have been for Korea but it certainly was not publicized that way.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 09:09 AM   #62 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
More nations would go nuclear faster than America can attack them all. Nuclear weapons would just have to be accepted in the future. America's just going to help delay it, and that too not by much.

The only way anyone EVER taking the nuclear disarmament argument seriously is when someone gets up and says "Ok lets ALL disarm".

Similar case with Iran. Israel can nuke Iran, Iran should be able to nuke Israel. Arabs now want nukes too because of Israel.

You can nuke NK, so should NK be able to nuke you.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 09:43 AM   #63 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil View Post
You can nuke NK, so should NK be able to nuke you.
The Chinese won't allow it.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 10:45 AM   #64 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
China wouldn't physically stop it either nor will allow a US attack. It's main purpose of support to NK is to keep US and its allies away from China.

The Chinese objections to NK shouldn't be misunderstood to assume that the Chinese would turn their back on them any time soon. NK depended on China for 80% of its food and energy needs, so China could've easily flexed its muscle long ago to influence a desicion. Whatever's happening right now probably is going to be accepted by China in the long run.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 11:26 AM   #65 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Are you in Antarctica? What the hell do you think the Chinese are doing? They've had enough and is closing down KJI's enterprises. His border criminal activities are being shut down one by one. His ringleaders are being arrested. Some even carrying NK diplomatic papers. They have not released NK funds and all NK warehouses in China are now in PAP hands.

And get this through your head. The NKs don't have a nuke. They have a dud.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 12:25 PM   #66 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
so you think China is going to join hands and you both will attack NK now like one big happy family?

aaaaand how did the last talks end...?

Of course its a dud, so? Still a pretty big boom.

Hey I agree China's a little frustrated over North Korea being so uncontrollable but the reason its supported NK in the first place was to prevent war. I think there was way too much international condemnation of NK when it conducted the test. It would have been PR suicide if China still didn't get tough on NK.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 15:10 PM   #67 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,532
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil View Post
so you think China is going to join hands and you both will attack NK now like one big happy family?

aaaaand how did the last talks end...?

Of course its a dud, so? Still a pretty big boom.

Hey I agree China's a little frustrated over North Korea being so uncontrollable but the reason its supported NK in the first place was to prevent war. I think there was way too much international condemnation of NK when it conducted the test. It would have been PR suicide if China still didn't get tough on NK.

China doe snot owe Kim anything, it like all natiosn will look out for itself. Kim has becoem a liability that could expose China to radioactive fallout, and criple 1-3 major trading partners (They may not like Japan but they like the Yen), and subject china to a flood of refugees.

So yes if push come sot shove working with the US to achive a solution to the Korean problem is not to far out in left feild.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2006, 20:40 PM   #68 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil View Post
so you think China is going to join hands and you both will attack NK now like one big happy family?
Who said anything about joining hands. This is a one China show.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil View Post
aaaaand how did the last talks end...?
And how fast did China replaced the border guards with PLA troops and shut the border tight? How fast did China cancelled three oil shipments? How fast did China demanded loans repayment? That's what happenned the last time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil View Post
Of course its a dud, so? Still a pretty big boom.
For a nuke, it was a dud, not worth the effort. They could have done better damage with thermobarics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil View Post
Hey I agree China's a little frustrated over North Korea being so uncontrollable but the reason its supported NK in the first place was to prevent war. I think there was way too much international condemnation of NK when it conducted the test. It would have been PR suicide if China still didn't get tough on NK.
It was far more than that. The Chinese lost of Face is unrecoverable. They've sheltered the NKs from collapse and gone to bat to prevent harm to their country to the point of putting them under the Chinese nuclear umbrella and promising that they will guarantee their national sovereignty and then, this slap in their face.

No one is saving KJI now. The question is how to manage his removal but make no mistake, the Chinese have determined that he shall be removed.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2006, 00:13 AM   #69 (permalink)
YellowFever
Contributor
 
YellowFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: In front of my computer...duh!
Posts: 502
I agree with the Colonel.

Both SKorea and Japan are huge trading partners with China.
If either of them are threatened, it would not be in China's best interest.

On the other hand, NKorea (more specifically, KJI) is nothing but a pain in the ass, despite the purpose it serves to the Chinese (that of being a buffer).

I think it's a matter of time before military actions are taken.

More likely it'll be a Chinese backed coup rather than a full scale invasion....
__________________
...If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
YellowFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2006, 01:45 AM   #70 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Who said anything about joining hands. This is a one China show.
Quote:
More likely it'll be a Chinese backed coup rather than a full scale invasion....
I can see that happening if the opportunity is ever presented to China in their lap. But they'd not want the US near it in any case. NK has to continue to be a buffer state for the Chinese.

But still its a fluid situation. I won't agree with you in stating that, that is the only fate left for KJI.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2006, 06:46 AM   #71 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,532
Country:
And why exactly would China rather have a US nuclear responce on North Korea vs a joint operation to rmeove KJI?
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 04:09 AM   #72 (permalink)
xrough
Contributor
 
xrough's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-08-07
Location: Manila
Posts: 746
Country:
It would be better for China to stay away in the NK's issue and convince NK's to disarm because if ever that US will do the final job, China is not ready yet to stop it.
xrough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 09:46 AM   #73 (permalink)
Archer
Senior Contributor
 
Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Posts: 2,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Sir,

Over at CDF, we're discussing an PRC-NK war scenario and the question that keeps popping up is why ain't the Chinese invading?

The NKs are the source of NE China's criminal problems including counterfeit currency, drugs, gambling, extortion, gang wars, prostitution, and illegal arms. The NKs are doing more to hurt China than Noreiga did when he was Panama's dictator.
Sir, the fact is that the NK serves as a good tool to keep SK, Japan in check. It also acts as a useful client state for other states like Pak, to receive tech from.

Strategic reasons make it a nice ally to have, even if it is a pain in the butt sometimes.
__________________
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu

My bow is stretched for its task
Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 12:41 PM   #74 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,321
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
And why exactly would China rather have a US nuclear responce on North Korea vs a joint operation to rmeove KJI?

Finger pointing and gleening info sounds about on target.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 13:19 PM   #75 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archer View Post
Strategic reasons make it a nice ally to have, even if it is a pain in the butt sometimes.
With friends like these, who needs enemies?
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Liberals Blame America for Nick Berg's Death Leader Political Discussions 43 08-20-2007 04:30 AM
Do G4 have a case. crooks Political Discussions 165 12-31-2006 06:58 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
U.S. Misled Allies About Nuclear Export Tronic Political Discussions 0 10-19-2006 23:21 PM
Why the U.S. must withdraw from Iraq lulldapull The War in Iraq 56 01-04-2005 14:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8