ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2006, 22:22 PM   #76 (permalink)
Akshay
formerly ab041937
Senior Contributor
 
Akshay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-27-05
Posts: 1,523
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
No, the Chinese have two other choices.

A Chinese supported coup
I doubt it if China would do so.. any coup would be successful only if there is a suitable substitute available which I doubt anyone to be. Morover, the stakes are too high.

1)If coup fails Kim would take it as a hostile act & turn against China. This could put China in a quandary whether to get into loggerhead with NK & create another trouble alongside Taiwan or to side with US & launch an attack on NK which incase is still a losing game for China from both the ends. It is known that NK missiles can atleast hit the cities on Western China. Evenif, NK is rolled over by Allied forces it would bring US forces on Chinese border.

2) Now even if Chinese supported coup is successful, there is no guarantee that North Koreans would accept the puppet leader. This could throw NK into anarchy & the Chinese fears of NK refugees pouring into China could come true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
The 2nd option has been spelled out in no uncertain terms to Kim. In any war with the South, North Koreans ain't moving south to their brothers. It's north away from the fighting.

To this end, the 38th and 39th Group Armies are tasked with the North Korean situation. They are the best armed and best trained of all PLA armies.
Sir, I've had conversation with many a South Koreans all of whom have said one thing to me. It is that 'North Koreans are their brothers'. They wish to help them get food, jobs & stability. Also, what I've witnessed is an equal degree of anger against US both by North Koreans & South Koreans. It was also told to me that if it wasn't for US, korean peninsula would've already been one. Now, I am not sure how much of this is adopted by the government in Seoul but, one thing that is clear is that if there is a war, it would be between US & NK. And I am not sure in the wave of countinuous hostilities in Afghanistan/Iraq, how many wars can US afford to fight at one time. Moreover, in case of NK... US would be directly exposing its troops against a possiblr nuclear attack(I say this since KJ Il is definately insane..).

Interesting times we are living in!!!! If we are lucky we would eyewitness the firsthand events unfolding the apocalypse.
__________________
If at first you don't succeed, call it v1.0!
Akshay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 22:23 PM   #77 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,981
Country:
Some commentary from Cordesman from CSIS.

http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/...commentary.pdf
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 22:42 PM   #78 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,113
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
I doubt it if China would do so.. any coup would be successful only if there is a suitable substitute available which I doubt anyone to be. Morover, the stakes are too high.
We really do not have enough intel on the situation inside North Korea to state anything. The Chinese would have better contacts as who's in and who's out and they're not sharing that info. The only thing I can tell you that's a Chinese option.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
1)If coup fails Kim would take it as a hostile act & turn against China. This could put China in a quandary whether to get into loggerhead with NK & create another trouble alongside Taiwan or to side with US & launch an attack on NK which incase is still a losing game for China from both the ends.
You've said so yourself. The Chinese can create the conditions to collapse Kim extremely easily. Cut off the water and electricity. The probelm here again is that this action creates the very thing the Chinese wants to avoid. North Korean refugees in China.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
It is known that NK missiles can atleast hit the cities on Western China.
So what? If it's a North Korean nuke, right now, no one is scared.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
Evenif, NK is rolled over by Allied forces it would bring US forces on Chinese border.
Not if the PLA invades 1st.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
2) Now even if Chinese supported coup is successful, there is no guarantee that North Koreans would accept the puppet leader.
You're talking about a population conditioned to a personality cult, actually two personality cults. The 1st thing people are going to do when Kim is gone is to wake up and asked themselves, "what happenned?" Then, they will get pissed off about Chinese rule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
This could throw NK into anarchy & the Chinese fears of NK refugees pouring into China could come true.
A Chinese occupation army does wonders, doesn't it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
Sir, I've had conversation with many a South Koreans all of whom have said one thing to me. It is that 'North Koreans are their brothers'. They wish to help them get food, jobs & stability. Also, what I've witnessed is an equal degree of anger against US both by North Koreans & South Koreans.
Which generation are you talking to?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
It was also told to me that if it wasn't for US, korean peninsula would've already been one.
Sure, under North Korean Rule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
Now, I am not sure how much of this is adopted by the government in Seoul but, one thing that is clear is that if there is a war, it would be between US & NK.
Not possible. The South Koreans are the ones manning the DMZ. The US 2ID are the reserved manouver force.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
And I am not sure in the wave of countinuous hostilities in Afghanistan/Iraq, how many wars can US afford to fight at one time. Moreover, in case of NK... US would be directly exposing its troops against a possiblr nuclear attack(I say this since KJ Il is definately insane..).
Not today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ab041937 View Post
Interesting times we are living in!!!! If we are lucky we would eyewitness the firsthand events unfolding the apocalypse.
I don't think so.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 22:55 PM   #79 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 10,017
Country:
Any possibility of a Chinese invasion with SK taking responsibility for NK control? (presumably with a negotiated US withdrawl)
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:11 PM   #80 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,113
Country:
I am unaware of any such plans.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:27 PM   #81 (permalink)
Zhang Fei
Banished
 
Zhang Fei's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-04-05
Posts: 230
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
It's not Kim that the Chinese are worried about. It's the entire North Korean population living off Beijing's dollar that they're worried about.
China doesn't provide aid for refugees or even internal migrants from one city to another. If they find work, they eat. If not? They don't. China has 1.3 billion people, 30% of whom don't speak Mandarin - the national language. North Korean refugees will blend in just fine with north eastern China's several million-strong Korean ethnic minority.

China can absorb the entire North Korean population (20 million) without breaking a sweat. Just one example - cities in the booming coastal areas of southern China have absorbed a hundred million migrants from other regions, many of whom do not even speak Mandarin, China's lingua franca - which means that they would be just like an Appalachian hillbilly stranded in Poland - or a North Korean stranded in China. Despite the huge numbers of out-of-area migrants, the wages in these cities are starting to creep up to the point that plant managers are looking at other countries. North Koreans - with ethnic Korean supervisors from China's northeastern provinces - could fill that gap quite easily. The Koreans would probably kill to get the wages and work conditions at which out-of-area Chinese migrants are turning up their noses.

China has tons of room - for it to get to Hong Kong's population density would mean a total population of 60 billion. It has half Britain's population density and could physically absorb several North Koreas.

So why is China repatriating North Korean refugees? If the entire North Korean population moves to China, Kim has no country. China is deporting those people to keep North Korea afloat. East Germany's Communist government collapsed because people were leaving in droves for West Germany via Hungary. If North Korea decamps for China, South Korea can unify the country without firing a shot. That's not what China wants.
Zhang Fei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:37 PM   #82 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,113
Country:
You've never seen a refugee camp.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:43 PM   #83 (permalink)
Commando
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-01-05
Posts: 412
Country:
Parihaka's idea seems very sensible. China invades. Once the North Korean government is topelled. Korea becomes unified with current South Korean government as the main government.

Although i can't see this happening. And am in favour of US air strikes on nuclear facilities and government compounds. A ground invasion could risk direct tensions with China and China would never want the USA near there border.

To me we have to resolve this quickly. If not its gonna lead to an arms race. And an unstable world!!!!!!
Commando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:46 PM   #84 (permalink)
Commando
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-01-05
Posts: 412
Country:
Its up to China to wake up and smell the coffee. If it doesn't act and goes by only imposing sanctions. Then i think the USA has every right to all their military options.

Once again America have to act as world police and ensure our freedom. Once again we will get those morons winging, about no-war.
Commando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:51 PM   #85 (permalink)
Zhang Fei
Banished
 
Zhang Fei's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-04-05
Posts: 230
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
You've never seen a refugee camp.
That's because China hasn't set any up and doesn't consider North Korean migrants refugees. The Chinese view is that they are economic migrants.
Zhang Fei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2006, 23:53 PM   #86 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
I don't think South Korea would have supported that. And China certainly would have come down on Kim's side. IOW, it would have been war.
Whatever it took, this day should've never been allowed to come to pass.

And the same for Iran, but TENFOLD.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 00:38 AM   #87 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,113
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zhang Fei View Post
That's because China hasn't set any up and doesn't consider North Korean migrants refugees. The Chinese view is that they are economic migrants.
They're currently treated as much as the Americans treat illegal Mexicans. However, that is a big difference of 20 million people showing up with nothing demanding food, water, and shelter. Can you house 100 people out of the blue? What makes you think China can do the same to 20 million people?
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 01:12 AM   #88 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,991
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by parihaka View Post
Any possibility of a Chinese invasion with SK taking responsibility for NK control? (presumably with a negotiated US withdrawl)
I highly doubt South Korea would want to be responsible for NK.


Quote:
The costs of Korean reunification have been estimated by some sources [including the World Bank] to be as high as $2–3 trillion, about five or six times South Korea’s gross domestic product.

South Korea has a population of 48.6 million with an annual income of $19,200 per capita. North Korea has about 23 million people with a per capita income of $1,400. Were the two countries to reunify, the resulting country would have a combined population of over 70 million, but with an average per capita income of about $13,500. That is, in some sense the cost of reunification to South Koreans could be a one-third reduction in annual income.

The population of East Germany was only a quarter that of West Germany, while the per capita GDP of East Germany was believed by the West in 1991 to be somewhere between two-thirds and three-quarters that of West Germany. By some estimates the East German per capita income turned out to be only a quarter that of West Germany. Thus, the overall burden of Korean reunification might be as much as ten times greater than that of German reunification.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...oplan-5029.htm
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 01:28 AM   #89 (permalink)
Tronic
Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,447
Country:
Quote:
Catch Islamabad to punish Pyongyang


NORTH KOREA did not carry out its nuclear test to acquire weapons and deter an external nuclear threat. It faces no such threat. The intention behind the test was to acquire nuclear weapons as an insurance against the United States's attempts to carry out a regime change in North Korea using economic pressure.

North Korea had agreed earlier -- once during former US president Bill Clinton's tenure in 1994 and once during the six-party talks -- to give up its nuclear weapons programme if the US engaged in direct talks with it, lifted all sanctions and gave a security guarantee.

Thus North Korea's effort is modelled on Pakistan where the present ruler maintains that any pressure on him to democratise will lead to instability, and when that happens there is no guarantee that nuclear weapons and nuclear materials will not fall into the hands of terrorist non-state actors. That ensures the US stake in the continuing stability of the regime.

From now on, the US will have to engage North Korea and ensure its stability. In order to do so it may be necessary to provide economic assistance to North Korea and create conditions for stability.

North Korea has a notorious reputation for transferring arms to terrorist groups. Its leader argues that it is one of few items of export they have. Subtle blackmail will be used, as Pakistan has done. If the US does not want such things to happen, it should engage North Korea directly, ensure its regime stability and assist it economically.

The US may have thought that since it was successful in forcing Libya to give up its nuclear-weapons programme, it would succeed with North Korea too.

That approach overlooked the fact that North Korea-Pakistan nuclear proliferation had advanced very far while the Pakistan-Libya proliferation had been at an incipient stage.

The US was developing a missile-defence programme essentially against North Korean nuclear missiles. The hawks who had been arguing in favour of the programme will now feel justified.

But the missile defence of the US, even if it proves successful, will not solve the problem of North Korean proliferation to terrorist non-state actors. That needs US engagement of North Korea.

A nuclear North Korea will affect the security environment of the whole of East Asia. South Korea will have to decide between strengthening its security relationship with the US and acquiring its own nuclear determent. It will also call for a basic change in Japan's non-nuclear policy based on a constitution imposed by General MacArthur.

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is known to favour revising the constitution. The next few months will decide what course of action Japan adopts. South Korea and Japan acquiring nuclear weapons will only help them deter a nuclear attack on them by North Korea. In fact such an attack is a very unlikely prospect.

North Korea will attempt to blackmail the US, Japan and South Korea for substantial economic aid on its conditions, lest it be compelled to transfer nuclear materials and technology to non-state actors. This threat cannot be dealt with either by US missile defence or by Japanese and South Korean acquisition of nuclear weapons.

In other words, the North Korean aim will be to make the US, Japan and South Korea pay for the continuance of Kim Jong-Il's dictatorial regime without any external intervention, on his terms and conditions.

A somewhat similar strategy has been successfully practised in the past five years by President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan.

Sixty years of nuclear theology developed by western strategists has given no insights into dealing with a blackmailing nuclear state in a world where terrorist non-state actors pose threats to civil societies of major democratic nations. But North Korea is not the originator of this strategy, Pakistan is. The battle over North Korean proliferation was lost by the US in its dealings with Musharraf.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/5...2500000000.htm

hmm... so what is being done to the orginial proliferators which proliferated the Nuclear tech to the North Koreans in the first place??? lets see... F-16s, Harpoons, Orions...
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2006, 02:08 AM   #90 (permalink)
Zhang Fei
Banished
 
Zhang Fei's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-04-05
Posts: 230
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
They're currently treated as much as the Americans treat illegal Mexicans. However, that is a big difference of 20 million people showing up with nothing demanding food, water, and shelter. Can you house 100 people out of the blue? What makes you think China can do the same to 20 million people?
The same way that China's coastal cities took in 100m out of area migrants. One prototypical southern Chinese city has a native population that is 1/7 of its current population - the non-native 6/7 showed up within the last decade - and it isn't even an outlier. North Koreans can't possibly demand any more than China's internal migrants demand anything - these Koreans come from a background where they had nothing to eat, had to work long hours and were punished for falling behind (in some cases executed).

The typical assimilation process for Korean refugees - as for Chinese internal migrants - would go like this - they go to a place and sleep out in the open for a short time. After a while, they get hungry and start looking for work. The natives offer them piece work for next to nothing. They start working, eating and start looking at getting some lodging, of which there is an abundance, given China's overheated real estate market. In many cases, they won't even have to worry about that - Chinese employers will provide them with a bed in a communal dorm (arranged like an army barracks, with rows upon rows of bunk beds) and subsidized food, just as they provide these items for out-of-area migrants looking to make it in China's boomtowns.

In fact, given Chinese work arrangements, finding lodging for the family wouldn't even be a problem. The typical arrangement is for the breadwinner to live in a dorm, and for the rest of the family to live dozens or even hundreds of miles away, where the housing is cheap. In the rural areas forty or fifty miles from China's boomtowns, the rent on a one-bedroom apartment might be as low as 100 yuan a month. In rural areas that are not near boomtowns, it's likely even less. How does the family get together? It does so perhaps once or twice a month depending on how far away the breadwinner lives.

Now, I haven't even mentioned the elephant in the room. As I noted above, China could absorb the entire North Korean population without breaking a sweat. But the fact is that China could admit all 20m North Koreans and not have to assimilate them. For the reality is that every North Korean is automatically a South Korean citizen. China could simply repatriate them - to South Korea. But China will neither assimilate North Korean refugees nor accept them in preparation for their journey to South Korea. Because to do so would mean the end of the North Korean Communist state, just as the transit of East German refugees to West Germany via Hungary meant the end of the East German Communist state.

Last edited by Zhang Fei : 10-10-2006 at 02:13 AM.
Zhang Fei is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Agni designers are incompetent: Pakistani scientist platinum786 Political Discussions 141 07-12-2006 18:08 PM
India's First and Largest nuclear power plant.. Jay Science & Tech 30 02-11-2006 13:50 PM
Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council Dreadnought Political Discussions 13 01-16-2006 15:14 PM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM
Nuclear Terrorism Jay South Asian Defense Topics 6 09-09-2004 15:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 AM.