ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2006, 15:45 PM   #91 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,390
Country:
The Japanese (spit) are merely hoping all of their victims die over the next few years.

The allies forced Germany to face what it did and even then they still play a dance game... Japan wasn't even forced to go through that...
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

Last edited by troung : 10-16-2006 at 15:53 PM.
troung is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 16:07 PM   #92 (permalink)
The Godfather
New Member
 
Join Date: 10-05-06
Posts: 9
I don't think China will attack Japan because of the following reasons:

1) Japan and China trades supplies with each other so if China sended a nuclear bomb against Japan there economy would become a big catastrophy

2) Japan and USA has cloes ties and is very friendly to each other. So if China attacked Japan they would probably start world war 3 which I don't think they have much interests in.

3) If you took 30 US special forces against 1000 chinese normal assault soldiers.. the US special forces would propably win.. The chineese army has only old weapons from the 60's and the 70's such as AK-47.. Theese weapons compared to the modern US weapon has a very big difference..
The Godfather is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 17:08 PM   #93 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Those were never apologies from the Japanese government, just apologies as individuals - to escape admitting legal responsibility and therefore compensation.
Every Prime Minister since the 70's doesn't qualify as gov't. apologies?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
No, they have not. It's 50 years now and the people on both sides of this issue are dying off. Is it too much to ask to make the Comfort Women and PoWs comfortable in their final years? Apparently, it is.
I think the comfort women were each paid about $20,000 and given free medical for life.

Japan paid South Korea $800 Million to settle all claims after the war.

Sure, they should probably do more, but they haven't just denied everything either, like people like to claim.

Hell, for all we know, that Wiki page is censored in ML China.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 17:18 PM   #94 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,209
Country:
Is it too much to ask the Japanese government not to pay official tribute to their war criminals? We don't see Gerhard Schroeder pay official tribute to Joseph Goebbels or Herman Goering.

No amount of money can make things right for the sufferings of the death camp victims or comfort women. All they ask for is that the Japanese government tell the world that they were wrong to start a war and not to worship their war criminals as heroes. And please don't whitewash their invasion of every single nation in east and southeast Asia during their imperial run.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 17:33 PM   #95 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Is it too much to ask the Japanese government not to pay official tribute to their war criminals? We don't see Gerhard Schroeder pay official tribute to Joseph Goebbels or Herman Goering.
I just think that's a gross exagerration. The shrine is for the 2.5 million Japanese soldiers that were killed in the war, not for the 14 or so that were executed for war crimes.
highsea is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 17:37 PM   #96 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,484
Country:
highsea,

Quote:
Every Prime Minister since the 70's doesn't qualify as gov't. apologies?
no, and that uses the logic of the japanese themselves. as the japanese like to point out, the PM visits to yasukuni are merely "personal visits to pray for the dead".

Quote:
I think the comfort women were each paid about $20,000 and given free medical for life.
certainly not all of them, and what restitution there were was NOT done in the name of the japanese government (it came from a PRIVATE fund). the japanese government refuses to take legal responsibility, and just BARELY acknowledges moral responsibility, with the latter coming only after mountains of evidence as well as the japanese themselves started to complain.

Quote:
Japan paid South Korea $800 Million to settle all claims after the war.
not to "settle all claims", it was just part of the diplomatic normalization cachet. and a good part of that 800 mil were loans.

Quote:
Sure, they should probably do more, but they haven't just denied everything either, like people like to claim.
i'm not saying they've denied everything. but almost everything they HAVE owned up to only came after immense pressure from both outside and within; the way they own up to it is privately and not state admissions of guilt; and even this is done half-heartedly, "i personally regret the actions of the past" as opposed to "we, the japanese, were guilty of such, such, and such; we are sorry; and we will make amends."

that is not an act of a contrite nation, and this is not what a responsible nation should do.
astralis is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 17:41 PM   #97 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,484
Country:
Quote:
I just think that's a gross exagerration. The shrine is for the 2.5 million Japanese soldiers that were killed in the war, not for the 14 or so that were executed for war crimes.
what i'd like to know is why, then, japanese politicians did NOT go to yasukuni PRIOR to the secret admission of those class-A war criminals in the 70s.

if they want to honor their war dead, that's fine. remove the damned bastards, and better yet, throw the ashes into a trash heap with curses. i'd bet you 100-1 if they did that, japanese relations with the other asian countries would get a LOT better overnight.
astralis is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 18:33 PM   #98 (permalink)
Goatboy
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-07-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Those were never apologies from the Japanese government, just apologies as individuals - to escape admitting legal responsibility and therefore compensation.
Seems an official apology from a Prime Minister could be construed as a government declaration of apology, I guess the Japanese Diet could also issue statements collectively.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
No, they have not. It's 50 years now and the people on both sides of this issue are dying off. Is it too much to ask to make the Comfort Women and PoWs comfortable in their final years? Apparently, it is.
It wouldn't take all that much money, maybe just a few billion. Japan should do it. After all, the US settled the claims of Japanese Americans interned for the war (a far lesser crime) a few years ago. Still, I have great respect for the Japanese nation, it's culture, the people, and the force for good it's represented since 1945. I'd like to see these things rectified nonetheless.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Ever noticed that Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, the US's closest allies of the region don't have an alliance between them? Even when the US got Japan to help Taiwan in case of a Mainland attack, the answer was thanks but no thanks. You cannot expect the ML Chinese to achieve what the US has failed to achieve.
I expect even a nuclear armed North Korea won't make South Korea and Japan good buddies.
Goatboy is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 18:43 PM   #99 (permalink)
Goatboy
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-07-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis View Post
if they want to honor their war dead, that's fine. remove the damned bastards, and better yet, throw the ashes into a trash heap with curses. i'd bet you 100-1 if they did that, japanese relations with the other asian countries would get a LOT better overnight.
Looking in from the outside, it seems it's impossible for Japanese to both honor the 2.5 million dead soldiers, while simultaneously ignoring the 14 war criminals also buried at the shrine. Wouldn't take much effort to remove those 14. I'm certain most Japanese wouldn't mind a bit either, they'd read about the removal in the paper, then go back to their everyday lives.
Goatboy is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 18:57 PM   #100 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
I think the comfort women were each paid about $20,000 and given free medical for life.
Those living in Japan. Those outside Japan got squat all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Japan paid South Korea $800 Million to settle all claims after the war.

Sure, they should probably do more, but they haven't just denied everything either, like people like to claim.
That was government to government, as per the agreements sign with all the WWII victors, including the ROC and later, the PRC. However, all signatories stipulated that this was a government to government settling of accounts. It has nothing to do with private organizations nor individuals.

Only the Japanese claims that these agreements include private orgs and individuals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Hell, for all we know, that Wiki page is censored in ML China.
Considering the leaks we've been getting, wouldn't do them very much good.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 19:16 PM   #101 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goatboy View Post
...I'm certain most Japanese wouldn't mind a bit either, they'd read about the removal in the paper, then go back to their everyday lives.
The Japanese Gov't cannot force the Yasukuni shrine to remove anyone (it's not like the actual remains are there anyway, the shrine only houses the "spirits"). The shrine is not a government facility, it's a private religious site. Shintoism says that the souls are purged of evil at the time of enshrinement, so removing them would amount to eternal condemnation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis View Post
...what i'd like to know is why, then, japanese politicians did NOT go to yasukuni PRIOR to the secret admission of those class-A war criminals in the 70s.
Do you know this for a fact?

Besides, it would have probably been political suicide, considering the Japanese aversion at the time to anything warlike. It's only the resurgence of nationalism in Japan that makes it less controversial (in Japan) now.

The shrine dates back to the 19th century, and it honors the dead from 11 wars. People were visiting it long before WW2. It's only the politicizing of it that makes it an issue today. IOW, it's just an excuse for behavior that would be exhibited anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
...Only the Japanese claims that these agreements include private orgs and individuals.
I was under the understanding that the individual claims were taken over by the Korean Gov't. under the agreement. From the Wiki page:
Quote:
on 17 January 2005, additional documents detailing the minutes of Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and South Korea were released by South Korean government. They suggest that the South Korean government agreed not to demand further compensation, either at the government or individual level against the Japanese government, after receiving $800 million in grants and soft loans from Japan as compensation for its 1910-1945 occupation, and to take all responsibility for individual cases in place of the Japanese government.
highsea is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 19:28 PM   #102 (permalink)
Goatboy
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-07-06
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
The Japanese Gov't cannot force the Yasukuni shrine to remove anyone (it's not like the actual remains are there anyway, the shrine only houses the "spirits"). The shrine is not a government facility, it's a private religious site. Shintoism says that the souls are purged of evil at the time of enshrinement, so removing them would amount to eternal condemnation.
I hadn't realized that ty for informing me So no Japanese remains exist at the shrine at all? Hmm, ok well I suppose removal of those 14 is a little more complicated then lol.

Dispelling with the "removing them would amount to eternal damnation" concept for the moment, do you have any suggestions on how to "cleanse" the Yasukuni shrine of those 14? Maybe just a few quick swipes with a chisel to erase their names from ... somewhere in the shrine? Maybe some "cleansing ceremony" to remove the souls? Just curious
Goatboy is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 20:19 PM   #103 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,209
Country:
Then please use the words like "started a war" and "invasion" in their textbooks instead of "invited" and "security" or some other bullcrap to describe their role in WW2.
gunnut is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 20:20 PM   #104 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,209
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goatboy View Post
I hadn't realized that ty for informing me So no Japanese remains exist at the shrine at all? Hmm, ok well I suppose removal of those 14 is a little more complicated then lol.

Dispelling with the "removing them would amount to eternal damnation" concept for the moment, do you have any suggestions on how to "cleanse" the Yasukuni shrine of those 14? Maybe just a few quick swipes with a chisel to erase their names from ... somewhere in the shrine? Maybe some "cleansing ceremony" to remove the souls? Just curious
Denounce these war criminals as what they are and expose their crimes for everyone to know would be a good start.
gunnut is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 23:21 PM   #105 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,484
Country:
Quote:
Do you know this for a fact?

Besides, it would have probably been political suicide, considering the Japanese aversion at the time to anything warlike. It's only the resurgence of nationalism in Japan that makes it less controversial (in Japan) now.
yes, i know this for a fact. the first PM visits were started by PM miki takeo in 1975, when the shrine-keepers (whose chairman is usually a ruling-party LDP member, including one class-A war criminal himself) had already begun to secretly debate whether or not to start honoring the convicted class-A'ers. (the shrine-keepers finally put them in 3 years later.) there's a good reason why the current emperor refuses to go anywhere near yasukuni- it's for this very reason that those war criminals are there. at least HE'S got morals and brains.

as the rest of the shrine, actually, i would like to mention that just the shrine itself is already an irritant, considering where and why most of those dead japanese were killed (let me give you a hint: the vast majority of the dead didn't die in japan, and weren't fighting to defend japan). the museum that whitewashes or alternatively glorifies everything the japanese have ever done makes it worse (and this includes the americans too: in the museum, the galleries state that it was america who forced japan into the war, stopping the poor japanese from "liberating" the rest of east asia from western imperialism).

Quote:
The shrine dates back to the 19th century, and it honors the dead from 11 wars. People were visiting it long before WW2. It's only the politicizing of it that makes it an issue today. IOW, it's just an excuse for behavior that would be exhibited anyway.
yeah, guess which started politicizing it. no one forced a gun to koizumi's head and told him to go. furthermore, no one forced the japanese to make the temple a hallowed place that glorifies militaristic japan. funny how chinese and south korean relationships with japan were actually relatively decent before this whole yasukuni and history book brouhaha.

seriously, dude, if you ever go to japan go visit the place. it's quite accessible, right off the shinjuku line. see it with your own eyes. the galleries even have very nice english and chinese translations of their skewed and screwed-up "history".

Last edited by astralis : 10-16-2006 at 23:26 PM.
astralis is offline  
Closed Thread




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
India Vs. China (borderline War) Kontakt Era Land Forces 565 09-02-2008 13:36 PM
Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek oneman28 Political Discussions 7 11-28-2007 08:43 AM
China's foot in India's door Neo International Politics 29 07-08-2007 03:31 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
How China Will Change Your Business oneman28 Political Discussions 6 04-04-2005 12:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8