ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2006, 11:46 AM   #136 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
I've been to China and I understand what you're trying to say but what you're not understanding is that the Jinns, Laos, etc, did not replace their rulers. They kicked them out and set up independent kingdoms. That made them distinct from the Soongs or Hans or Tangs. Until Kublai united them all under one banner, they were not one country, let alone one people.
Some words in China can't translate into English .As you are "a military historian" and " a watcher of PLA for 20 years",and you have gave many posts about china history,but dou you know Chinese even a little? when we translate "zhong hua ren min gong he guo " in to " PRC" ,the means changed.But we can't find a better way to translate.And i think if you learn a little chinese ,you will find many debates are meaningless.
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 11:50 AM   #137 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Do you consider Canadians, Australians, British, Irish, and Americans one people?
still I don't consider Canadians, Australians, British, Irish, and Americans one people.I never said this. I also never said the Mongolian and Han are a people.But "Chinese" is not a people .It consists of Han and Mogolian and so on.
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:03 PM   #138 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
I speak Mandarin and Cantonese and read Chinese and I don't buy the one China and Chinese theory. It doesn't explain the wars, the uprising, and the treatment of Mongol and Qing rulers.

And I've seen too many wars to ever believe this one China crap.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:12 PM   #139 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,484
Country:
wangrui,

Quote:
I think I would not debate the China history with offier,he even not konw Chinese is not a people but a summarization of all peoples of China,or he would not say Mongolians are not Chinese. I think even a middle school student in China konw this.
the idea of the five-race republic only came during the time of sun zhongshan (sun yatsen).

sorry to tell you, but you are using MODERN ideas- nationalism- to try to fit ancient history. that does not work.

Quote:
Sorry offier ,but as "a military historian" you still not understand what does china and Chinese mean. China does not means Ming or Tang or PRC. So the Ming does not means china too.China consist of Ming and Mongol
that time.Just as the south and north of US in the civil war.
during those times there WAS no china. there was only tian xia, with all the barbarians running along the outskirts. durring the warring states period (even prior to the idea of tian xia), the kingdoms of wei, qi, and han all thought the kingdoms of qin, yan, and chu were all semi-barbaric states, for example- despite the first two (and partly the latter) being mostly han ethnicity.
astralis is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:19 PM   #140 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
I speak Mandarin and Cantonese and read Chinese
Oh , I'm sorry that you can speak Chinese.
So the debates are due to this

Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
and I don't buy the one China and Chinese theory. It doesn't explain the wars, the uprising, and the treatment of Mongol and Qing rulers.
And I've seen too many wars to ever believe this one China crap
满招损,谦受益
man zhao sun ,qian shou yi~

I think you should learn this .

Last edited by wangrui961 : 10-17-2006 at 12:20 PM. Reason: spell
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:28 PM   #141 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
And this proves you've learned the wrong thing

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/a...ow/2172558.cms
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:38 PM   #142 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis View Post
wangrui,



the idea of the five-race republic only came during the time of sun zhongshan (sun yatsen).

sorry to tell you, but you are using MODERN ideas- nationalism- to try to fit ancient history. that does not work.
"Chinese" means "Zhongguo ren ", and "Zhongguo ren" never means Han people or any people in any time.1000 years ago it did't means a people and so doesn't now.
And this has noting to do wtih Sun zhongshan's idea.
Quote:
during those times there WAS no china. there was only tian xia, with all the barbarians running along the outskirts. durring the warring states period (even prior to the idea of tian xia), the kingdoms of wei, qi, and han all thought the kingdoms of qin, yan, and chu were all semi-barbaric states, for example- despite the first two (and partly the latter) being mostly han ethnicity
So whether Hawaiians are Ameicans ?
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:44 PM   #143 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
**** ROLLING MY EYES ****

Right! So, the fact that the Mongol Empire stretches all the to Poland meant that the Poles, Russians, Turks, Arabs, Afghanis were all once Chinese citizens.

HORSE PUCKEY!
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:48 PM   #144 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
And this proves you've learned the wrong thing

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/a...ow/2172558.cms
Sorry Officer, I can't believe this because I just get words and words from your link.And even this is true ,I don't think I learned the wrong thing.I have read a lot about this .my teacher told us such things in the classroom.Students can get any informations include good or bad to China,I don't think this means anything.In the 1960s ,many people run to the USSR from the west border and we let them go. But now ,If you want to go aborad ,you can apply to the goverment and give up the nationality,you can go.Why they "run" to Nepal ? If a man "run" to Mexco from us ,your soldiers will do nothing?
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:50 PM   #145 (permalink)
gps glonass
Banished
New Member
 
gps glonass's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-14-06
Location: BANNED
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
I speak Mandarin and Cantonese and read Chinese and I don't buy the one China and Chinese theory. It doesn't explain the wars, the uprising, and the treatment of Mongol and Qing rulers.

And I've seen too many wars to ever believe this one China crap.
No you don't speak Chinese, your just a disgruntled India-fan who cries because the dali lama is going senile or you cry because of the PRC's control of Aksai Chin, and moan because Indian got their asses handed to them by China in '62. I don't know why you keep insisting that Turkish people own China, its seems you've confused China's ethnic groups ( Cantonese, Mongol, Yi, Han....) with the people of Uzbeks, Turks Macedonians, Azerbaijanis, Siberian Tatars...they are all totally different ethnic groups. None of them are Turks, they only share some random historical traits or vague links to the Turkish language. If you called a Azerbaijani a 'Turk', he'd punch you right into the face...its as stupid as trying to claim Spanish are all Romans or claim Spain should do owned by Arabs because of some foggy historical links.

Why are you bringing up the conquest of A-stan, the commies never laid claim to this dump. Afghanistan is an ungovernable hell hole, and even if some Chinese Mongolid owned it the Chinese of today wouldn't be bothered claiming it, its such a dump they only thing they can offer the world are narcotics, sand and terrorism.

Last edited by gps glonass : 10-17-2006 at 12:55 PM.
gps glonass is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:52 PM   #146 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
**** ROLLING MY EYES ****

Right! So, the fact that the Mongol Empire stretches all the to Poland meant that the Poles, Russians, Turks, Arabs, Afghanis were all once Chinese citizens.

HORSE PUCKEY!
officer ,Chinese has a so wide mening ,the Singaporean are Chinese,whether they are China citizens?
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:53 PM   #147 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,484
Country:
wangrui,

Quote:
"Chinese" means "Zhongguo ren ", and "Zhongguo ren" never means Han people or any people in any time.1000 years ago it did't means a people and so doesn't now.
And this has noting to do wtih Sun zhongshan's idea.
i remind you that the ming called themselves the DA MING, the qing called themselves the DA QING. the definition of "zhong guo" changed in almost EVERY DYNASTY, and even during the spring & autumn periods/warring states period.

Quote:
If a man "run" to Mexco from us ,your soldiers will do nothing?
US college students do that every friday night.
astralis is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 12:54 PM   #148 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by wangrui961 View Post
...If a man "run" to Mexco from us ,your soldiers will do nothing?
ROFLMAO. No, we'll gun him down like a dog...

You know how hard it is to get into Mexico from the US? You drive across a speed bump. You don't even have to stop.

No one tries to prevent Americans from going to Mexico, dude. That's the funniest thing I've ever heard.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 13:03 PM   #149 (permalink)
wangrui961
Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 300
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
ROFLMAO. No, we'll gun him down like a dog...

You know how hard it is to get into Mexico from the US? You drive across a speed bump. You don't even have to stop.

No one tries to prevent Americans from going to Mexico, dude. That's the funniest thing I've ever heard.
Just a "IF" .i mean each soldier would gun if any one want to run across the border, err....change the example to the NK and SK or Pakstain and India.
wangrui961 is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 13:03 PM   #150 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gps glonass View Post
No you don't speak Chinese, your just a disgruntled India-fan who cries because the dali lama is going senile or you cry because of the PRC's control of Aksai Chin,
Go blow it out your corn hole, horse dung for brains.
Officer of Engineers is offline  
Closed Thread




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
India Vs. China (borderline War) Kontakt Era Land Forces 565 09-02-2008 13:36 PM
Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek oneman28 Political Discussions 7 11-28-2007 08:43 AM
China's foot in India's door Neo International Politics 29 07-08-2007 03:31 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
How China Will Change Your Business oneman28 Political Discussions 6 04-04-2005 12:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8