ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2006, 01:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,236
Country:
Howard to boost army personnel to 30,000

Howard to boost army personnel to 30,000

Patrick Walters, National security editor
August 15, 2006


Quote:
THE army will be expanded by 20 per cent over the next decade to about 30,000 personnel, with federal cabinet's National Security Committee today considering a $10 billion investment.

The call for more manpower comes as the 25,000-strong Defence Force faces unprecedented operational demands stretching from the Middle East to the South Pacific.

A larger army is seen as essential for Australia to deal with its core national defence and regional security responsibilities - such as East Timor - as well as taking part in coalition operations further afield.

Senior ministers will today also consider a separate submission from Defence Minister Brendan Nelson proposing an overhaul of Defence Force recruiting and retention practices at a cost of more than $100 million.

The aim is to get a significantly higher number of recruits from the 25,000 applications the Defence Force gets each year.

Defence wants an extra two 800-strong army battalions or battle groups which, together with supporting troops, would add close to 3000 soldiers to the army's existing six battalions.

The boost to the army is on top of the extra 1500 troops approved by the Howard Government last year as part of the long-term "hardening and networking" plan to re-equip the force for 21st-century warfare.

The army has already begun a multi-billion-dollar equipment upgrade, involving new helicopters, tanks, trucks, combat gear and communications systems.

The defence policy guidance submission will dictate even higher military spending from the Howard Government on top of the recent budget pledge to increase the defence budget by 3per cent in real terms over the next decade.

A revamping of Defence Force recruiting will be essential if the army is to increase its size in a far more competitive labour market.

The Government also plans to offer more generous retention bonuses for highly skilled personnel and will offer additional incentives for highly trained reservists who can easily slot into the permanent force for operational deployments.

The decision to opt for a larger land force is the key conclusion of a major policy review to be brought to cabinet by Dr Nelson.

The highly classified defence policy guidance document, the first of its kind since 1997, lays down broad guidelines for the development of the structure of the Defence Force.

It says that while coalition operations in countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq remain significant, the priority should be the defence of Australia and its immediate neighbourhood.

Defence chiefs have been concerned for some time that the existing army cannot sustain indefinitely major deployments to places such as East Timor and the Solomons as well as long-running commitments to coalition operations such as Iraq.

The 2000 defence white paper - still the Government's key public defence blueprint - called for the army to be able to sustain a 3000-strong brigade on operations as well as having a 800-strong battalion available for deployment elsewhere. This goal is yet to be realised.

After the Vietnam War, Australia's regular army remained more than 30,000 strong until 1991, when budget cuts led to the number of troops dropping to 25,000 by 1996.

In May, shortly before East Timor blew up, John Howard said Australians would have to get used to higher levels of defence spending in the face of new security challenges.

"We live in an unstable region, we'll have regional responsibilities of the Solomon Islands type for years into the future, and we need to have a military profile which is appropriate as well as having the capacity to join coalition operations in other parts of the world," the Prime Minister said. "Now that is going to be the lot, defence-wise, for Australia years into the future."

Dr Nelson's plan to revamp recruiting is likely to see a completely novel approach, with Defence attempting to build a sound customer relationship with potential recruits.

A total of 95,000 inquiries last year generated 25,000 applicants and resulted in fewer than 8000 men and women joining the Defence Force.
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 02:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Archer
Senior Contributor
 
Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Posts: 2,888
****, the Aussie army is that small? LOL, 30K is the size of a middling Indian paramil unit..
__________________
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu

My bow is stretched for its task
Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 13:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Yeah, but they can outdrink your entire army and then some.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 16:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
John Howard is a real man. Refer again to my posts (all of 'em) re: why I maintain that Australia is the US's best ally (bless 'em all).
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 21:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
Archer
Senior Contributor
 
Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Posts: 2,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Yeah, but they can outdrink your entire army and then some.
LOL!
Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 05:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
JBG
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-10-06
Location: Sydney
Posts: 138
Between WW1 and WW2 our army got down to just 1,500! 25,000 to 30,000 is not that bad, by comparison - there is a much larger cadre of trained ( and these days combat experienced ) personnel to provide for expansion, Still, getting Ausies to join up in peacetime has never been easy.

Jonathan ( born, bred and living in Sydney )
JBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 01:52 AM   #7 (permalink)
PandaRoo
Regular
 
Join Date: 10-11-06
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 28
Heehee...
Keep the fishermen from the northern neighbour outta the Aussie waters!

Channel 7 is pretty good at advocating those things:-D

Personally I don't think Australia faces any substantial threat from anybody.
Even most of the people I know in China like Australia, when they hate some other countries that much, LOL.

John's head is kinda deep in where the sun doesn't shine on George's body,
but only as deep as the boys and girls in Aus want his head to be.

That's democracy If he doesn't think his IR reform is p*ssing off enough people, go ahead and see if the next move of his is a nice try.
__________________
Going to the gym is not a sign of being shallow!
Get over it~:rolleyes:
PandaRoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 02:06 AM   #8 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Bout freakin time, if I had things my way we'd be going for 35 000 at least.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2006, 02:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
wangrui961
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-19-06
Posts: 297
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Yeah, but they can outdrink your entire army and then some.
I dont think so
wangrui961 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NATO vs. Warsaw Pact Metak Warfare in the Modern Age 290 05-26-2008 06:27 AM
Pakistan: President sacks chief justice Lahori paa jee Political Discussions 50 04-04-2007 03:36 AM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
Doctrine: Total Peoples Defense troung Land Forces 17 07-02-2005 01:46 AM
India eyes Pakistan's leaner, meaner army Aryan South Asian Defense Topics 24 05-18-2004 11:43 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8