ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > International Defense Topics
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2003, 18:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,859
Country:
U.N. May Abandon Afghan Effort

U.N. May Abandon Afghan Effort

Associated Press
December 13, 2003


KABUL, Afghanistan - The United Nations, already forced out of Iraq by suicide bombers, may have to abandon its two year effort to stabilize Afghanistan because of rising violence blamed on the Taliban, its top official here warned Friday in an interview with The Associated Press.

Lakhdar Brahimi said his team could not continue its work in this war-ravaged nation unless security improves. He called for more foreign troops to halt attacks that have killed at least 11 aid workers across the south and east since March.

"Countries that are committed to supporting Afghanistan cannot kid themselves and cannot go on expecting us to work in unacceptable security conditions," Brahimi said.

"They seem to think that our presence is important here. Well, if they do, they have got to make sure that the conditions for us to be here are there," he said. "If not, we will go away."

NATO, which commands a 5,500-member peacekeeping force in the capital, Kabul, has agreed in principle to expand into the provinces. But nations have been slow to come forward with pledges of troops and equipment.

In addition to the peacekeepers, a U.S.-led force of some 11,700 soldiers are still pursuing Taliban remnants, followers of al-Qaida and fighters loyal to renegade warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan, responding to Brahimi's comments, said the Bush administration hopes the world body remains in Afghanistan.

"Our military and those working with us there as well in the coalition efforts have done an outstanding job to improve the security situation," McClellan said.

"There's more to do and they're continuing to do that," he said. "But the U.N. has an important role to play in the efforts going on there - they have been playing an important role and we hope they will continue to."

German and Canadian troops now make up the bulk of the NATO peacekeeping force.

Brahimi said Turkey was considering sending more soldiers to join up. "We hear that the Turks are thinking about sending more troops and that's very welcome."

But he emerged empty-handed from a meeting Friday with the French defense minister.

The minister, Michele Alliot-Marie, "tells me she is not against the principle of expansion but nobody is coming in with resources, with soldiers and they, France, are committed elsewhere," Brahimi said.

NATO's expansion outside Kabul is shaping into teams that would provide security to humanitarian and reconstruction efforts in the provinces. The Germans have agreed to spearhead a team in the north, in Kunduz, and the United States is leading several others around the country, particularly in the troubled south.

But the United Nations views the teams as no substitute for an expanded security force.

Secretary of State Colin Powell and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld suggested this month that NATO could take over all military operations in the country - including combat missions now run by the U.S.-led force.

The United Nations pulled its foreign staff out of vast areas of the country in October after the death of Bettina Goislard, a 29-year-old French refugee worker slain in the eastern city of Ghazni. It also suspended some operations in regions bordering Pakistan, where Taliban militants and their allies have been most active.

The pullback followed a similar drawdown in Iraq, where an August truck bomb that killed 23 people at the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad sparked the withdrawal of international U.N. staff.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said Wednesday that Iraq is still too dangerous. Most U.N. functions in Iraq are to operate from a new regional base in Cyprus, with local staff trying to fill the gap.

U.N. calls for international troops to fan out across Afghanistan's troubled provinces got louder after Goislard became the first international U.N. worker killed here since the fall of the Taliban government in late 2001.

This month, the U.S.-led force launched a big, new operation across the south and east. But the operation, dubbed Avalanche, has been overshadowed by the deaths of 15 children in two U.S. military raids on suspected militants.

Brahimi urged the U.S. military to take more care to avoid such tragedies, and also to drop some of its most questionable allies, a reference to anti-Taliban warlords viewed by many Afghans as corrupt and dangerous.

In a discussion paper sent to diplomats in Kabul this week, Brahimi warned that the unpopularity of such warlords - including some in Cabinet - was playing into the hands of the Taliban.

Brahimi, who plans to give up his post at the end of December, called for a new international conference to shore up the peace process that began in Germany two years ago.

Resurgent Taliban violence is "delaying the creation of a stable peaceful society. That it will derail the process? I don't think so," he said.


http://www.military.com/NewsContent?..._afghan_121303
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 21:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
D.C
New Member
 
D.C's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-03
Location: Iowa
Posts: 15
Send a message via Yahoo to D.C
just a few quick words on this subject, screw the U.N.
D.C is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random Thoughts on the Mighty Hog - Part 2 Shipwreck Military Aviation 114 07-26-2008 08:15 AM
French warplane bombs Taliban targets troung Operation Enduring Freedom 40 04-15-2008 17:14 PM
Afghanistan and the Future of Warfare troung Military Aviation 5 02-22-2008 20:59 PM
UN coverup of Oil for Food scandal Anon Political Discussions 0 06-01-2004 10:34 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8