Banning Notification - Page 2

**TopHatter** · 11-06-2005, 22:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parihaka

Ahh, but maybe that's his modus operandi

[GLANCESSUSPICIOUSLYOVERHISSHOULDER]

Yeah, I was thinking that too but I didnt want to spook our quarry...

Shhhhhhh.....

**Parihaka** · 11-06-2005, 22:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TopHatter

Yeah, I was thinking that too but I didnt want to spook our quarry...

Shhhhhhh.....

Wait a minute, you replied before I'd even POSTED that comment.
Hmmmmm

**TopHatter** · 11-06-2005, 22:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parihaka

Wait a minute, you replied before I'd even POSTED that comment.
Hmmmmm

You posted right on the hour and I replied a minute later....

...is somebody being just a little too paranoid?

Bulgaroctonus · 11-06-2005, 22:05 PM

I am not the same person as Raptor1992, and thank you for making the intelligence distinction between myself and lulldapull. I just found lulldapull's defunct profile. He had over 900 posts! It seems that a person with that many posts is not so easily banned.

Also, does the status of being a Senior Member convey any protection from banning? For example, three out of five moderators have to vote for the ban.

Bulgaroctonus · 11-06-2005, 22:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TopHatter

Hmmmmm good point....I think it's high time we put Bulgar under the microscope....

Its a waste of time, you couldn't find a microscope that big. A CAT scan or electroencephalograph would be better.

**Parihaka** · 11-06-2005, 22:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TopHatter

You posted right on the hour and I replied a minute later....

...is somebody being just a little too paranoid?

[Twitches spasmodically] What? Who me? what? who said that? Oh my God it's happening ag................................................ ...............

**TopHatter** · 11-06-2005, 22:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus

I am not the same person as Raptor1992,.

That remains to be seen Comrade.

Quote:

and thank you for making the intelligence distinction between myself and lulldapull.

Think nothing of it old boy.

Quote:

I just found lulldapull's defunct profile. He had over 900 posts! It seems that a person with that many posts is not so easily banned.

I'm trying to remember if he was also a multiple personality freak, it was awhile ago.
I'll do some checking because now you've got me curious

Quote:

Also, does the status of being a Senior Member convey any protection from banning?

Well, I think they probably cut the long-time members a little more slack for certain issues. Especially if they are a highly valued contributer.
But if one of them was stupid enough to start posting with multiple names, I'd say they'd probably be nothing but a memory in short order

Quote:

For example, three out of five moderators have to vote for the ban.

Again, something for the Mods/Admins to tell you.

Bulgaroctonus · 11-06-2005, 22:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parihaka

[Twitches spasmodically] What? Who me? what? who said that? Oh my God it's happening ag................................................ ...............

Haha! This is the funniest post I've read all night.

**TopHatter** · 11-06-2005, 22:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus

Its a waste of time, you couldn't find a microscope that big. A CAT scan or electroencephalograph would be better.

*Sinister German accent* You are being very foolish, ve have vays of making you talk...

Quote:

Originally Posted by parihaka

[Twitches spasmodically] What? Who me? what? who said that? Oh my God it's happening ag................................................ ...............

GET AHOLD OF YOURSELF MAN!!
*Jackslaps parihaka across the face and shoves Cheetos into his mouth*
Here, these will return you to normal!!

Bulgaroctonus · 11-06-2005, 22:15 PM

I'm glad that this thread actually has found some use: We are forming a record of why certain people have been banned.

It seems like lulldapull was banned for repeated religious and/or racial comments that were deemed unsuitable. However, I haven't tracked down the precise things that got him booted. Its impressive that he actually incurred the wrath of Ironduke, a fellow I rarely see interact with the Board. Confed999 also didn't like lulldapull that much.

**Parihaka** · 11-06-2005, 22:15 PM

mmmmmmm, cheeetoooossss..... (why does my face hurt? ah well, never mind)
mmmmmmm, cheeetoooossss.....

**Parihaka** · 11-06-2005, 22:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus

I'm glad that this thread actually has found some use: We are forming a record of why certain people have been banned.

It seems like lulldapull was banned for repeated religious and/or racial comments that were deemed unsuitable. However, I haven't tracked down the precise things that got him booted. Its impressive that he actually incurred the wrath of Ironduke, a fellow I rarely see interact with the Board. Confed999 also didn't like lulldapull that much.

I think they enjoyed debating with him, he simply racked up too many violations. He received far more warnings than most other banned people put together.

Bulgaroctonus · 11-06-2005, 22:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parihaka

I think they enjoyed debating with him, he simply racked up too many violations. He received far more warnings than most other banned people put together.

Man, you need to get a hold of your face. Anyway, I'm looking at one of lulldapull's old threads called Lebanon's Hollow 'Cedar Revolution.' I think it had something to do with the assassination of Rafik Hariri back in February. lulldapull kept calling Confed999 and the other moderators 'fundos' as in 'Fundamentalist Chrisitian.' I think it was lulldapull's general disdain for authority that finally put him on the black list.

lulldapull also attracted the attention of Gio, a guy I see even more rarely than Ironduke.

**TopHatter** · 11-06-2005, 22:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus

I'm glad that this thread actually has found some use: We are forming a record of why certain people have been banned.

Actually to be perfectly frank, it's none of our business why somebody gets banned.
This board is not community property, it's private property. The Geneva Convention is void here; Amnesty International doesn't know we exist. If the Mods/Admin want you or me to disappear...POOF!
Fortunately, the higher-ups here are not quite that arbitrary, though it's just not a good idea to argue about why a person was banned. Question yes, argue no. (And no, you havent been arguing)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus

It seems like lulldapull was banned for repeated religious and/or racial comments that were deemed unsuitable.

That sounds suspiciously like lulldapull

Quote:

Originally Posted by parihaka

mmmmmmm, cheeetoooossss..... (why does my face hurt? ah well, never mind)
mmmmmmm, cheeetoooossss.....

The healing powers of Cheetos have saved you my son. Continue to consume them at regular intervals...then make burnt sacrifices to the Sacred Cheetah...

Leader · 11-06-2005, 22:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus

lulldapull also attracted the attention of Gio, a guy I see even more rarely than Ironduke.

Gio is around here occasionally. I talk to him practically everyday over IM though.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Pakistan: Banning unIslamic Rituals	Ray	Political Discussions	0	03-12-2006 14:09 PM
Dutch considers banning burqas!	indianguy4u	Current Affairs	82	02-08-2006 01:06 AM
The infamous suicide-attack banning Fatwa	Asim Aquil	Political Discussions	1	05-23-2005 10:43 AM

11-06-2005, 22:05 PM	#19 (permalink)
Bulgaroctonus *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 10-29-04 Location: Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Posts: 1,139 Country:	I am not the same person as Raptor1992, and thank you for making the intelligence distinction between myself and lulldapull. I just found lulldapull's defunct profile. He had over 900 posts! It seems that a person with that many posts is not so easily banned. Also, does the status of being a Senior Member convey any protection from banning? For example, three out of five moderators have to vote for the ban.

11-06-2005, 22:15 PM	#25 (permalink)
Bulgaroctonus *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 10-29-04 Location: Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ Posts: 1,139 Country:	I'm glad that this thread actually has found some use: We are forming a record of why certain people have been banned. It seems like lulldapull was banned for repeated religious and/or racial comments that were deemed unsuitable. However, I haven't tracked down the precise things that got him booted. Its impressive that he actually incurred the wrath of Ironduke, a fellow I rarely see interact with the Board. Confed999 also didn't like lulldapull that much.

11-06-2005, 22:15 PM	#26 (permalink)
Parihaka Moderator Join Date: 11-10-04 Location: Te Ika a Maui Posts: 9,462 Country:	mmmmmmm, cheeetoooossss..... (why does my face hurt? ah well, never mind) mmmmmmm, cheeetoooossss.....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)