Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Stryker SRAT II

  1. #1
    Senior Contributor Triple C's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Apr 06
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,824

    Stryker SRAT II

    Are the slat armor on Stryker replaced yet by the reactive armor tiles?
    All those who are merciful with the cruel will come to be cruel to the merciful.
    -Talmud Kohelet Rabbah, 7:16.

  2. #2
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,491
    Why? Slat armor has several advantages over reactive tiles such as cost and no infantry standoff required, so unless there's a significant change in the operational environment, there's no need to switch over. As to development/production of the tiles, I don't know.
    Last edited by Shek; 10 May 12, at 11:28.
    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

  3. #3
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    5,366
    Not to mention the logistics implications are hugely different. Slat armor is much easier to deal with.
    Remember that it is the Actions and not the Commission that make the Officer and that there is More expected from him than the title. – GEORGE WASHINGTON

  4. #4
    Senior Contributor Triple C's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Apr 06
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,824
    I am asking because it was two years ago that General Dynamic's tiles had been accepted and I still don't see any Stryker protected by those in any pics. Thanks for the response. Makes sense that there isn't the battle need. Slat's probably lots cheaper, too.
    All those who are merciful with the cruel will come to be cruel to the merciful.
    -Talmud Kohelet Rabbah, 7:16.

  5. #5
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    5,366
    Probably stored in ASPs (it is demo after all) and can be issued as needed.

    Reactive armor and the like has very specific HAZMAT rules attended to it....for very good reasons.
    Remember that it is the Actions and not the Commission that make the Officer and that there is More expected from him than the title. – GEORGE WASHINGTON

  6. #6
    Senior Contributor Triple C's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Apr 06
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,824
    Sorry to revisit an old thread. What's the state of non-explosive reactive armor (NERA)? Can the technology used in M1 TUSK's anti-EFP NERA tiles be re-egineered against HEAT threats? Or is that technology in truth only less explosive than non-explosive?
    All those who are merciful with the cruel will come to be cruel to the merciful.
    -Talmud Kohelet Rabbah, 7:16.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Stryker MGS.
    By Triple C in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 18 May 10,, 02:15
  2. Stryker BDE for Afghanistan?
    By HKDan in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05 Feb 09,, 06:07
  3. BTR-90 vs Stryker
    By Garry in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 18 Nov 08,, 21:13
  4. Stryker MGS cancelled?
    By Bill in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 14 Dec 05,, 02:41
  5. New Stryker Variant
    By Wraith601 in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 27 Jun 05,, 00:00

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •