Thread: US army vs. Russian army

Actually, we took ArkAngel and held it for almost a year despite being cut off from our supplies....and we left at our timetable, not the enemies.

And we also made landings in Vladivostok, and again, we left on our timetable, not the enemies.

Thus definitively disproving your statement that the US Army is not good enough to invade Russia.

If you want to talk further about the mission by all means go ahead. My Bn was one of the US units deployed, so i know more about this op than probably 95% of the people alive- our Bn CO made sure we knew our units history.

Russia is where we got our unit motto, "Polar Bears".

Huh, sweet.

Also... (quotes by KONTAKT ERA)
"Some people said that we lost the Korean and Vietnam war. There is a one flaw with that. We killed of millions upon millions of koreans and Vietnamese in both wars. America's casualties were only 53 odd thousand and 30,000. When they say "America lost the war" it meant we didnt complete the mission which was to rid off communism. You guys are saying America got its ass kicked. Thats not true. FIY India wouldnt be able to repel American forces so easily if they we were attacking their ground. Face it, Indian air missile defence is pretty bad, airforce is nothing compard to America's, and as I was told before India's navy is just a blue water navy, and only good defence. It's still not good enough to defend against America's. India would give a hard time to the U.S., but your definetly getting ahead of yourself when you say America's bones are going to be crushed. Plus India has some sort of dignity to not take the war to the cities. It's not urban warfare like the Iraq war, so its just going to be a technology compettition. You really think if an American General were to see Indian tanks and mortars line up, hes going to send ground forces? He's going to fire missiles against it....durr. You guys make it seem like its going to be like a Battle of the Bulge scenerio."

"It's so funny that your comparing enemies like Pakistan to America. Pakistan is a little backwater country. And dont deny it cause your using it as a puppet to show how great India's military is. If America wanted to go into an all out war, it would be able to take out anyone. I know that India has the defense advantage, but there are no civilians in the way. That means that American can turn the battle field into hell if it wanted to. I mean we turn cities into hell to (like in Iraq) and thats against U.N. policies. Imagine what were goign to do to an enemy with nothing in the way besides old Russia technology."

"Wait, how do you guys expect to even invade Russia? Unless your attacking cities, American army will be facing wasteland. Were going to suffer the same problems we would in a desert. Technology doesnt really have much affect out there right? Russian generals might as well just send out soldiers who know the land best to pick off any stranded American battalion right? American army is good, but not good enough to invade Russian soil....I mean ice. :P"

"LOL, are you talking about the embarrising attempt the U.S. made in WW1? America got wooped along with allies. That was unsuccessful. We didnt even do it on our own. We used England as a tactical sheild before we went in. Even then we took a small town called ArchAngel and then retreated. Yeah we got so far there......"

Something smells fishy...