Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 211

Thread: NATO wants Indian troops to operate in Afghanistan

  1. #121
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Blademaster View Post
    LOL! I am sorry but I don't buy this one. There has never been an incident that Pakistan was going to face against the Soviets. In fact, Afghanistan was a side show to Pakistan. In fact it was an opportunity for them to establish strategic depth. Before the Afghanistan, Pakistan was not friendly with Afghanistan. When USSR invaded and left, Pakistan actually got what they wanted, strategic depth. During the entire USSR occupation, the nukes were postured against India. Never against USSR or even any threats of using the nukes against USSR.
    The incident was December 1979. I don't know if you were too young or do not remember but there was genuine military shock at the speed and execution of that invasion. Right at that moment, the invasion was seen as the 1st step towards the traditional Russian desire for a warm water port and there were only two ways to go from Afghanistan. Iran or Pakistan.

    Right at that time, immediate plans were drawn up on rapid reaction brigades on how to meet the Soviets head on in both Iran and Pakistan with or without local approval.

    China was of course shocked to hell just how far advance the Soviets have jumped ... and how far she has fallen behind.

    Of course, today, we have the benefit of hindsight that there was never any Soviet desire to go any further but at the time, I remember arguing whether it was better to hit the Soviets in Afghanistan or fight to hold a bridge head ... and that was about all we could have done.

    Do recall that Ronald Reagan has yet to fully implement his strategy and gave us the confidence that we needed.

    And let's face it, Moscow was not exactly comforting anyone that they were not going to march any further.

    Whether or not Pakistan had ulterior motives does not ignore the fact that Pakistan needed a nuclear umbrella if she was going to face the Soviets head on. We were not willing to provide one. And the Chinese arsenal in face of the Soviets was a suicide pact with Pakistan.
    Chimo

  2. #122
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by malaymishra123 View Post
    OOE, just to clarify here, its Delhi not Dehli..!
    Unlike you youngster, my hand eye co-ordination is not what it used to be.
    Chimo

  3. #123
    Patron Equilibrium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 05
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    The incident was December 1979. I don't know if you were too young or do not remember but there was genuine military shock at the speed and execution of that invasion. Right at that moment, the invasion was seen as the 1st step towards the traditional Russian desire for a warm water port and there were only two ways to go from Afghanistan. Iran or Pakistan.

    Right at that time, immediate plans were drawn up on rapid reaction brigades on how to meet the Soviets head on in both Iran and Pakistan with or without local approval.

    China was of course shocked to hell just how far advance the Soviets have jumped ... and how far she has fallen behind.

    Of course, today, we have the benefit of hindsight that there was never any Soviet desire to go any further but at the time, I remember arguing whether it was better to hit the Soviets in Afghanistan or fight to hold a bridge head ... and that was about all we could have done.

    Do recall that Ronald Reagan has yet to fully implement his strategy and gave us the confidence that we needed.

    And let's face it, Moscow was not exactly comforting anyone that they were not going to march any further.

    Whether or not Pakistan had ulterior motives does not ignore the fact that Pakistan needed a nuclear umbrella if she was going to face the Soviets head on. We were not willing to provide one. And the Chinese arsenal in face of the Soviets was a suicide pact with Pakistan.

    At the time, concerns of a further Soviet advance from Afghanistan into Iran to exploit the internal upheaval of the revolution to reach the Persian Gulf was also very high.

    The Soviet invasion was taken as such an advance that it led the Carter Adminstration to declare the Carter Doctrine which stipulated that any further Soviet advance out of Afghanistan into the Persian Gulf/ Middle East region would provoke a US military response. From that policy declaration, the US Rapid Deployment Force- the predecessor to today's Central Command- was created as its military component.

  4. #124
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Equilibrium View Post
    From that policy declaration, the US Rapid Deployment Force- the predecessor to today's Central Command- was created as its military component.
    The only problem with that was that it was a lie and Moscow knew it. Come on, an airborne division against a tank army? Can we say suicide?
    Chimo

  5. #125
    Patron Equilibrium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 05
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    The only problem with that was that it was a lie and Moscow knew it. Come on, an airborne division against a tank army? Can we say suicide?

    Operationally, yes. But the RDF was more than the 82nd. It included at least 2carrier battle groups, sevral Army formations, a Marine amphbious force and about 200-300 USAF aircraft. It also was tasked with tactical nuclear weapons.

    The hypothetical Soviet invasion of Iran would have led from the mountainous passes of the Elbruz which were often one way and filled with sudden drops and bends- DoD analysis at the time estimated that a 100-200,000 strong Soviet inavsion force would spend about a month crossing the passes and increasingly out of range of Soviet CAS and mounting logistical challenges if resisted by small, mobile US infantry and air interdiction as the moved south/ southwest, buying enough time for the balance of the RDF of about 25,000-40,000 men to deploy at the Khuzestan oil fields at the shores of the Gulf supported by 2-3 CVBG's with approx 80-100 aircraft each along with 200-300 USAF aircraft supported by tactical nukes.

    It seemed possible with geography, the limitations they imposed on Soviet capabilities and US strategic air/sealift capabilities.
    Last edited by Equilibrium; 29 Jun 08, at 05:24.

  6. #126
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Equilibrium View Post
    Operationally, yes. But the RDF was more than the 82nd. It included at least 2carrier battle groups, sevral Army formations, a Marine amphbious force and about 200-300 USAF aircraft. It also was tasked with tactical nuclear weapons.
    How long did it took for VII Corps to get into position for the Kuwait War and V Corps to get into position for the Iraq War?

    How long did it took Siberia MR to get ready for Afghanistan?

    Quote Originally Posted by Equilibrium View Post
    The hypothetical Soviet invasion of Iran would have led from the mountainous passes of the Elbruz which were often one way and filled with sudden drops and bends- DoD analysis at the time estimated that a 100-200,000 strong Soviet inavsion force would spend about a month crossing the passes and increasingly out of range of Soviet CAS and mounting logistical challenges if resisted by small, mobile US infantry and air interdiction as the moved south/ southwest, buying enough time for the balance of the RDF of about 25,000-40,000 men to deploy at the Khuzestan oil fields at the shores of the Gulf supported by 2-3 CVBG's with approx 80-100 aircraft each along with 200-300 USAF aircraft supported by tactical nukes.
    I have absolutely no idea where you got your numbers but at the time, there were 67 Divisions that we counted that could have been commited (that's 600,000 troops), 3000 aircrafts, and 1000 nukes.

    Numbers were NOT on our side.
    Chimo

  7. #127
    Patron Equilibrium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 05
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    How long did it took for VII Corps to get into position for the Kuwait War and V Corps to get into position for the Iraq War?

    How long did it took Siberia MR to get ready for Afghanistan?

    I have absolutely no idea where you got your numbers but at the time, there were 67 Divisions that we counted that could have been commited (that's 600,000 troops), 3000 aircrafts, and 1000 nukes.

    Numbers were NOT on our side.
    I would never have believed that numbers would be on our side in any scenario. Not to mention that it would have been inserted in the middle of an Iran in the throes of an anti-Western revolution. Indeed, in my participation in a wargaming of the expected RDF scenario in the analysis I quoted above of a Soviet invasion with a Khuzestan objective, almost a quarter of the total US available ground forces would have been committed to stopping the Soviet advance for such a limited objective. But with almost 500-600 US aircraft in support against a Soviet force that had outrun its air cover, I think the Soviets would not have enjoyed a cakewalk either.

    The analysis of the size of the Soviet force was factored by the available Sovie forces on the Soviet/Iranian border at the time of the announcement of the Doctrine and assumed a sudden attack as the logistical demands of augmenting those forces along with the redeployment of the Soviet forces in Afghanistan for the invasion westward would have taken too long and enabled greater US commitment. The progress of those forces was estimated as one Soviet division at a time emerging from the Elbruz passes due to the narrowness of the passes into the flat valley/ desert before the Khuzestan region. Some US planners thought that this would be the best place to enagage the Soviet force rather than await it entrentched in Khuzestan as in essence, the full striking power of the Soviet force would be prevented by massing by the restrictions of geography.


    Regarding the Historical Examples of Deployments:
    The Carter Doctrine used the RDF as an instrument, not its substance. It was meant to be a signal of commitment to the allies in the region at a time of uncertainty and an additional conventional option for the US to preclude an immediate spiral into a nuclear confrontation. Its goal in a conflict was not to defeat the Soviet force to end the crisis/ war, but to convince the Soviets that the US was willing to escalate and that if those US forces were on the brink of defeat or attack by nuclear weapons, the US would escalate. It would also complicate Soviet logistics as the balance of its Long-Range Aviation assets for example would have to be redeployed to the region to attempt to take on the US CVBG's supporting the RDF.

    Joshua Epstein in the link below provided an interesting analysis of the RDF's capability to defeat such a Soviet incursion into Iran. It's JSTOR, so you may have to pay for a subscription but the sample pages will give some of the essence of his analysis:

    Cookie Absent
    Last edited by Equilibrium; 29 Jun 08, at 06:54.

  8. #128
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Sorry,

    I see so many flaws in that scenario that it is not worth commenting on. We launched 2000+ sorties a day against an Iraqi force that remained operational until the Ground War to the point where they fought the largest tank battle since WWII and you expect me to believe that 600 aircrafts can do better against a much more better prepared Soviet Army?

    And the assumption that it is a hasty attack is completely whacked. The Soviets spent six months preparing for the Afghan invasion. When Carter was in, we couldn't even do REFORGER right and they expect me to believe that we could move to intercept the Afghan Soviets in Iran and Pakistan?

    And people are seriously expecting me to believe that Carter would've escalated? This is the man who could not even prepared the Iran Rescue right and chickened out.
    Chimo

  9. #129
    Patron Equilibrium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Jul 05
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Sorry,

    I see so many flaws in that scenario that it is not worth commenting on. We launched 2000+ sorties a day against an Iraqi force that remained operational until the Ground War to the point where they fought the largest tank battle since WWII and you expect me to believe that 600 aircrafts can do better against a much more better prepared Soviet Army?

    And the assumption that it is a hasty attack is completely whacked. The Soviets spent six months preparing for the Afghan invasion. When Carter was in, we couldn't even do REFORGER right and they expect me to believe that we could move to intercept the Afghan Soviets in Iran and Pakistan?

    And people are seriously expecting me to believe that Carter would've escalated? This is the man who could not even prepared the Iran Rescue right and chickened out.
    I was not sanguine about the prospects for success either. But, if the scenario had played out, I would have believed that it would have precipitated or been part of the larger NATO-WP general war.

    The Carter Administration even though I was not alive during it was a not a good one for US forces. I know many servicemen who were in at the time and they all were in agreement about his legacy. Some Army guys have told me that if the Soviets had attacked in 1977-80, they would have been speed bumps for the tank and shock armies of the GSFG.

    Carter escalating in '80 especially after Eagle Claw? I believe he would have. He was repeatedly accused of ineptitude and weakness after that. He came around after the Soviet invasion and began to increase the DoD's budget, increased support to the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan, fostered increased strategic cooperation with China and announced the Carter Doctrine. I think he would to demonstrate his mettle and prove he was not the pushover many believed.

  10. #130
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Hitesh, step back a few steps. You've fought 3 wars with Pakistan and where was China? Where was China when Pakistan lost half their country?
    Colonel,

    One must take the geography to realise that Chinese intervention is not as easy as it is felt.

    And vice versa.

    1962 is one off, when the Indian Army was a peace time, drill square ceremonial army.


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  11. #131
    Banned Infinity's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 May 06
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Infinity,

    I am not arguing against the Indian view. Each country has strategic needs that only they can come up with the solution for, be it developing your own capabilities or joining an alliance.

    What I am against is this double talk about disarmament while making smaller, better, and more lethal nukes.

    While Ghandi was giving his famous speech, Indian nukes already found a loop hole. I remind you that India was a declared non-nuclear weapons state at the time of that speech. The loop hole was that the nukes were in component form, not assembled operational warheads.

    That is the same blatant hyprocripsy that surrounds the Moscow Treaty where both the US and Moscow got around the 2000 warhead limit by keeping 10,000 component form warheads each.

    As I stated before, I find this subtefuge disgusting with both the US and Russia. I am not going to accept this lie just so India can have her cake and eat it too.

    Lastly, you need to get your history straight. There was never an offer of giving India the bomb. That is just plain rumour as about offering India the 6th UNSC seat.

    I also don't buy that India needed nukes to counter China. Again, anyone looking at the Sino-Soviet border knew where Chinese nukes were aiming. Further more, both Washington DC and Peking had determined Soviet preparations for a nuclear strike across to Lop Nor, Indian strategists could not have been that stupid to think Chinese nukes would survive such a strike and in turn aim at Dehli instead of Moscow.
    Sir

    India Goverment gave nod to go ahead with weaponization only in the late 1980's. Now it was before 1988 or after 1988, that is a point we can debate but without getting to a conclusion. (A small correction Sir: Its Gandhi and not Ghandi as the latter sounds more similar to a cuss word in Hindi).

    It was only in 1990's (before pokhran II) that there were some hints released in the press that india possesed capability to make Bomb(something like "India possesed capability to make Neutron bomb"). I have no doubt that in 1990's India did posses weaponized versions.

    Regarding Hyposcrasies: All I would say "The Famous Five" commited "The Orignal Sin". Then they also went all around the world telling other Nations not to be sinner simultaneously professing that they being high and mighty have the right to commit 'the sin". At that point India sincerely believed in Global Disarmament because of economic harsh realities it faced at that point. But right now like other N5 its merely paying lip service...

    Regarding America wanting to give India the bomb, there was an article that came up in a newspaper, few years back (maybe The Tribune, I tried to search for it in whatever archives were available on the net. But no luck...:( )
    It was during a visit to India, some speech was supposed to be given in Honour of the American President. At that time its said that the President leaned towards American Ambassador to India, who was sitting besides him, and asked him about his opinion on India being given the bomb. But unluckily there was a microphone for public addressal near him which was by chance On. Its said that American President was really offended by this leak incident and Indian Goverment officials had to face a lot of ire because of it.

    Sir, it should be remembered that the China initially got nukes from Soviet itself. India got embroiled in armed boundary dispute with China much before Soviet Union. For the period where you mentioned when Soviet wanted to conduct surgical strikes in Xinjiang, ie. in late 1960's, India had no Bomb program so to speak. India's weaponization journey only begain in late 1980's, And thankfully, it was because Indian Strategists were "stupid" enough to see that Peking, with Washingon DC deliberately looking the other way, had started arming Islamabad with the Bomb and missiles (So to speak of hyprocrasies). Earlier they were so "smart", that they caused India to suffer a humilating defeat from the hands of China. I think we simply need more stupid people to govern our country who could actually realise about whats happening right now on our northen borders.
    Last edited by Infinity; 29 Jun 08, at 09:39.

  12. #132
    Banned Infinity's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 May 06
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post

    Quote Originally Posted by OOE View Post
    Hitesh, step back a few steps. You've fought 3 wars with Pakistan and where was China? Where was China when Pakistan lost half their country?
    .
    Colonel,

    One must take the geography to realise that Chinese intervention is not as easy as it is felt.

    And vice versa.

    1962 is one off, when the Indian Army was a peace time, drill square ceremonial army. .
    Ray Sir

    Glad you took this point. I would really appreciate if you could give some details about China's aggressive posturing in Tawang in 1971. And also about runmour that during Kargil War China had tried about twenty four times to capture some area in Leh region (I think this was mentioned in General VP Malik's Book). Thanks in Advance.

    OOE Sir

    China did not go beyond some aggressive posturing in 1971 due to two facts:
    > India had maintained its troop presence in North Eastern Border
    > Perhaps biggest reason: India had support of Soviet Union
    Last edited by Infinity; 29 Jun 08, at 09:55.

  13. #133
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    04 Oct 07
    Posts
    65
    To give the Pakistanis some balls to stay in the fight against the meanest 200,000 man tank army history has ever saw.
    Just sort of jumped out of my chair when i read that! Apart from not believing that one bit, just wonder if that perception was common amongst the cold war planners at Pentagon and elsewhere in the West. If so they got things seriously wrong..

  14. #134
    Armchair Worrier Senior Contributor bolo121's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Dec 07
    Location
    india
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by dilawar View Post
    Just sort of jumped out of my chair when i read that! Apart from not believing that one bit, just wonder if that perception was common amongst the cold war planners at Pentagon and elsewhere in the West. If so they got things seriously wrong..
    Silly fellow...have alook below

    Group of Soviet Forces in Germany (Western Group of Forces)HQ Wundsdorf

    Translated by Constantine Pehlivanov
    Courtesy of ГЕНШТАБ - GENSTAB (история, военная, игры, wargame, сержант, наполеон, бородино, вермахт, оловянный, солдатик, фигурка, армия, журнал, sergeant, revue, history, napoleon, wehrmacht, borodino) and www.sinor.ru/~gsvg2001

    1 Guards Armored Army HQ Dresden

    20 Guards “ Prikarpatsko-Berlinskaya” Motorized-Rifle Division (MRD) - HQ Grimma

    29 Guards “Lublinski”Motorized-Rifle Regiment (MRR) - Plauen

    67 Guards “Yaroslavski” MRR - Grimma

    242 Guards “Zaleshtitzki” MRR - Wurzen

    576 Guards “Bobruiski” MRR - Glauchau

    944 Guards “Chernovitzko-Gneznenski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Leisnig

    358 Guards “Prikarpatsko-Gneznenski” SAM Regiment – Leisnig



    9 “Bobruisko-Berlinskaya” Armored Division – HQ Risa

    1 Guards “Chertkovski” Armored Regiment (AR) - Zeitchein

    1321 “Gluhovsko-Rechitzki” MRR - Juteborg

    70 Guards “Proskurovsko-Berlinski” AR - Zeitchein

    302 MRR - Risa

    96 Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Borna

    11 Guards “Prikarpatsko-Berlinskaya” Armored Division - HQ Dresden

    7 Guards “Novgorodsko-Berlinski” AR - Meissen

    40 Guards “Chertkovski” AR - Konnigsbruck

    44 Guards “Berdichevski” AR – Konnigsbruck

    249 Guards “Chernovitzki” MRR - Dresden

    841 Guards “Chernovitzki” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Hemniz

    1018 “Yaroslavski” SAM regiment – Meissen



    Direct Reporting Units

    225 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Altstadt

    485 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Brandiss

    181 Missile Brigade - Kochtstadt

    432 Missile Brigade - Wurzen

    308 Artillery Brigade - Zeitchein

    53 SAM Brigade - Altenburg

    41 Material Support Brigade - Dresden

    253 Independent Radio-technical Regiment - Merseburg

    68 Pontoon-Bridge Regiment - Dresden

    3 Independent Communication Regiment - Dresden




    Reconnaissance/Commando Units

    13 Independent Recon Battalion (IRB) of 9 AD - Zaitcheim

    9 IRB of 11 AD - Dresden

    68 IRB of 20 MRD – Grimma

    SPETZNAZ company at Army disposal
    2 Guards Armored Army HQ Fuhrstenberg

    21 “Taganrogskaya” MRD – HQ Perleberg

    239 MRR - Perleberg

    240 MRR - Ludwiglust

    283 Guards “Berlinski” MRR - Hagenow

    568 MRR - Parchim

    1054 Self-propelled Artillery regiment - Ratenow

    1079 SAM Regiment – Perleburg

    94 Guards “Zvenigorodsko-Berlinskaya” MRD HQ Schwerin

    204 Guards “Umansko-Berlinski” MRR - Schwerin

    286 Guards “Brandenburgski” MRR - Schwerin

    288 Guards “Kishinevski” MRR - Wismar

    74 Guards “Valginski” AR - Schwerin

    199 Guards “Brandenburgski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Wismar

    896 “Demblinski” SAM Regiment – Schwerin

    207 “Pomeranskaya” MRD - Stendal

    33 “Berlinski” MRR - Stendal

    41 “Berlinski” MRR - Gardelegen

    400 MRR - Malwinkel

    591 Guards “Rechitzki” MRR - State

    693 Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Stendal

    75 Guards “Demblinsko-Pomeranski” - Stendal

    16 Guards “Umanskaya” Armored Division HQ Neustreliz

    7 Guards “Umansko-Pomeranski” AR - Neustreliz

    65 Guards “Sevsko-Pomeranski” AR - Neustreliz

    60 MRR - Rawensbruck

    723 Guards MRR - Ratenov

    724 Guards “Varshavski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Neustreliz

    66 Guards “Lublinski” SAM Regiment – Neustreliz

    Direct Reporting Units

    172 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Damm

    439 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Damm

    290 Artillery Brigade - Schweinrich

    112 Missile Brigade - Genrodze

    458 Missile Brigade - Neustreliz

    61 SAM Brigade - State

    118 Material Support Brigade - Rawensbruck

    250 Independent Radio-technical Regiment - Stendal

    69 Pontoon-Bridge Regiment - Ratenov

    5 Independent Communication Regiment – Rawensbruck
    Reconnaissance/Commando Units

    170 IRB of 16 AD - Neuterliz

    34 IRB of 21 MRD - Perleberg

    12 IRB of 94 MRD - Schwerin

    6 IRB of 207 MRD - Hardlegen

    SPETZNAZ company at Army disposal

    In wartime 2 Guards Armored Army would get 19 MRD of former East Germany.
    3 Strike Army HQ Magdeburg

    7 Guards “Kievsko-Berlinskaya” Armored Division HQ Rosslau

    55 Guards “Vasilkovski” AR – Lutterstadt-Wittenberg

    56 Guards “Vasilkovsko-Shepetovski” AR - Zerbst

    79 Guards “Bobruiski” AR - Rosslau

    40 “Berlinski” MRR - Bernburg

    670 Guards “Lvovski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Kochstadt

    287 Guards “Lvovski” SAM Regiment - Rosslau

    10 Guards “Uralsko-Lvovskaya” Armored Division HQ Altengrabow

    61 Guards “Sverdlovsko-Lvovski” AR - Altengrabow

    62 Guards “Permsko-Keletzki” AR - Altengrabow

    63 Guards “Chelyabinsko-Petrokovski” AR - Altengrabow

    248 Guards “Unechski” MRR – Schonebeck

    744 Guards “Ternopolski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Altengrabow

    359 Guards “Lvovski” SAM Regiment – Altengrabow

    12 Guards “Umanskaya” Armored Division HQ Neuruppin

    48 Guards “Vapniarsko-Varshavski” AR - Neuruppin

    332 Guards “Varshavski” AR - Neuruppin

    353 Guards “Vapniarsko-Berlinski” AR - Neuruppin

    200 Guards “Fastovski” MRR - Burg

    117 Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Malwinkel

    933 “Verhne-Dneprovski” SAM Regiment – Burg

    47 Guards “Nizhnedneprovskaya” Armored Division – HQ Hillersleben

    26 “Feodosiiski” AR - Hillersleben

    153 “Smolenski” AR - Hillersleben

    197 Guards “Vapniarsko-Varshavski” AR - Halberstadt

    245 Guards “Gneznenski” MRR - Malwinkel

    99 Guards “Pomeranski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Malwinkel

    1009 SAM Regiment – Hillersleben
    Direct Reporting Units

    178 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Borstel

    440 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Borstel

    36 Missile Brigade - Altengrabow

    448 Missile Brigade - Born

    49 SAM Brigade - Planken

    385 Artillery Brigade - Planken

    42 Material Support Brigade - Magdeburg

    254 Independent Radio-technical Regiment - Magdeburg

    36 Pontoon-Bridge Regiment - Magdeburg

    105 Independent Communication Regiment - Magdeburg
    Reconnaissance/Commando Units

    40 IRB of 7 AD - Kwedlinburg

    112 IRB of 10 AD - Halberstadt

    180 IRB of 12 AD - Malwinkel

    7 IRB of 47 AD - Hillersleben

    SPETZNAZ company at Army disposal
    8 Guards Army HQ Nohra

    27 Guards “Omsko-Novoburgskaya” MRD HQ Halle

    68 Guards “Posnanski” MRR – Halle

    243 Guards “Berlinski” MRR - Halle

    244 Guards “Berlinski” MRR - Schlotheim

    28 “Brestski” AR - Halle

    54 Guards “Posnanski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Halle

    286 Guards “Premishlski” SAM Regiment – Halle

    39 Guards “Barvenkovskaya” MRD – HQ Ohrdruf

    117 Guards “Posnanski” MRR - Meiningen

    120 Guards “Posnanski” MRR - Ohrdruf

    172 Guards “Gnesnenski” MRR - Gotha

    585 Guards “Rechitzki” MRR - Ohrdruf

    915 SAM Regiment - Ohrdruf

    87 Guards “Posnanski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment – Gotha

    57 Guards “Novoburgskaya” MRD HQ Naumburg

    170 Guards “Demblinsko-Berlinski” MRR - Naumburg

    174 Guards “Pomeranski” MRR - Weisenvels

    241 Guards “Lodzinski” MRR - Leipzig

    51 Guards “Fastovski” AR - Zeitz

    128 Guards “Demblinsko-Pomeranski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Zeitz

    901 SAM Regiment – Naumburg

    79 Guards “Zaporozhskaya” Armored Division HQ Jena

    17 Guards “Orlovski” AR - Saalfeld

    45 Guards “Gusiatinski” AR - Weimar

    211 “Kalitzkovski” AR - Jena

    247 Guards “Lodzinski” MRR - Weimar

    172 Guards “Berlinski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Rudolstadt

    1075 SAM Regiment – Weimar
    Direct Reporting Units

    336 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Nohra

    486 Independent Helicopter Regiment – Altes-Lager

    11 Missile Brigade - Weisenvels

    449 Missile Brigade - Arnstadt

    18 SAM Brigade - Gotha

    116 Material Support Brigade - Altenburg

    390 Artillery Brigade - Ohrdurf

    119 Independent AR - Badlangensalz

    65 Pontoon-Bridge Regiment - Merseburg

    194 Independent Radio-technical Regiment - Weimar

    91 Independent Communication Regiment - Weimar
    Reconnaissance/Commando Units

    5 IRB of 27 MRR - Mulhausen

    11 IRB of 39 MRR - Meiningen

    113 IRB of 57 MRR - Rudelstadt

    10 IRB of 79 AD – Jena

    SPETZNAZ company at Army disposal

    In wartime 8 Guards Army would get 17 MRD of former East Germany


    20 Guards Army HQ Eberswalde-Finow

    25 Armored Division HQ Vogelsand

    162 AR - Vogelsand

    175 AR - Prenzlau

    335 AR - Prenzlau

    803 MRR - Vogelsand

    843 Self-propelled Artillery Brigade = Schonwalde

    1702 SAM Regiment – Prenzlau

    32 Guards Armored Division HQ Juteborg

    287 AR - Juteborg

    288 AR - Juteborg

    343 AR - Juteborg

    83 MRR - Dalgow

    469 Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Juteborg

    ? SAM Regiment - Juteborg

    35 “Krasnogradskaya” MRD HQ Krampniz

    62 “Slonimsko-Pomeranski” MRR - Potsdam

    64 “Slutzko-Pomeranski” MRR - Potsdam

    69 “Proskurovski” MRR - Wundsdorf

    83 Guards “Nezhinski” MRR - Krampniz

    219 “Kremenchugsko-Berlinski” AR - Olympischesdorf

    283 Guards “Varshavski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Ehlstall

    200 “Brestski” SAM Regiment – Krampniz

    90 Guards “Lvovskaya” Armored Division HQ Bernau

    6 Guards “Lvovski” AR – Bad-Freinwelde

    68 Guards “Zhitomirsko-Berlinski” AR - Bernau

    215 Guards “Kamenetz-Podolski” AR - Bernau

    81 Guards “Petrokovski” MRR – Eberswalde-Finov

    400 “Transilvanski” Self-propelled Artillery Regiment - Bernau

    288 Guards SAM Regiment - Bernau
    6 Independent Guards “Berlinskaya” MR Brigade - Karlchorst Direct reporting Units

    337 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Malwinkel

    487 Independent Helicopter Regiment - Presslau

    27 Missile Brigade - Juteborg

    464 Missile Brigade - Vurstenwalde

    67 SAM Brigade - Ehlstall

    117 Material Support Brigade – Eberswalde-Finov

    387 Artillery Brigade – Altes-Lager

    264 Independent Radio-technical Regiment - Neudenbritz

    44 Pontoon-Bridge Regiment – Frankfurt-on-Oder

    6 Independent Communication regiment - Eberswalde

    Reconnaissance/Commando Units

    58 IRB of 35 MRR - Krampniz

    30 IRB of 90 AD - Bernau

    53 IRB of 25 AD - Prenzlau

    107 IRB of 32 AD - Juteborg

    SPETZNAZ company at Army disposal
    16 Air Army HQ Wundsdorf

    6 Guards “Donetzkaya” Fighter Division HQ Merseburg

    296 Fighter-Bomber Air Regiment (FBAR) - Grossenheim

    31 Guards “Nikopolski” Fighter Air Regiment (FAR) - Valkenberg

    85 Guards “Sevastopolski” FAR - Merseburg

    968 FAR - Kobiz

    139 Air Technical regiment - Merseburg

    16 Guards “Svirskaya” Fighter Division HQ Damgarten

    33 FAR - Witstock

    773 FAR - Damgarten

    787 FAR - Eberwalde

    26 Fighter Division HQ Zerbst

    35 FAR - Zerbst

    833 FAR – Altes-Lager

    125 Fighter-Bomber Division HQ Rechlin

    19 FAR - Lehrz

    20 FBAR – Gross-Dehln

    105 Fighter-Bomber Division HQ Grossenhein

    296 FBAR - Grossenhein

    559 FBAR - Fuhrsterwalde

    911 FBAR – Brand
    Direct Reporting Units

    11 “Vitebski” Independent Recce Regiment - Wehlzov

    226 Independent Composite Air Regiment - Sperenberg

    357 Independent Attack Air Regiment - Brandis

    368 Independent Attack Air Regiment - Tutov





    Direct Reporting Units of Western Group of Forces

    2 SPETZNAZ brigades

    157 SAM Brigade - Primerwalde

    164 Missile Brigade - Drachhausen

    175 Missile Brigade - Oschaz

    133 SAM Brigade - Juteborg

    202 SAM Brigade - Magdeburg

    40 Radio-technical Brigade - Wittstock

    45 Radio-technical Brigade - Mersseburg

    1 Engineer-Sapper Brigade - Brandenburg

    118 “Bobruisko-Berlinskaya” Communication Brigade - Wundsdorf

    119 Communication Brigade - Leipzig

    132 Communication Brigade - Treuzenbritzen

    34 Artillery Division - Potsdam

    286 Guards “Prazhskaya” Howitzer Brigade - Potsdam

    288 “Varshavskaya” Heavy Howitzer Artillery Brigade - Hemniz

    303 Guards “Kalinkovichskaya” Cannon Brigade - Altengrabow

    307 Jet Artillery Brigade - Hemniz

    122 Antitank Artillery Brigade - Koningsbruck

    64 Automobile Brigade - Kummersdorf

    65 Automobile Brigade - Vurstenwalde

    27 Pontoon-Bridge Regiment – Luterstadt-Wttenberg

    272 Independent Communication Regiment – Frankfurt-on-Oder

    29 Independent ECM Regiment - Schenwalde

    67 SAM Brigade - Ehlstahl

    163 SAM Brigade - Leipzig

    252 SAM Brigade - Gera

    239 Independent Guards “Belgorodski” Helicopter Regiment – Oranienburg

    In wartime Western Group of Forces would get 6 MRD of former East Germany in reserve.



    Western Group of Forces was the backbone of Western strategic direction and its zone of responsibility included Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Denmark.

    Total force amounted to:

    363 690 men

    5 880 MBTs

    9 790 APCs/IFVs

    4 624 artillery pieces (caliber 100 mm and above)

    625 warplanes

    698 helicopters

    The army of former East Germany would back WGF and included:

    6 divisions (11 in wartime)

    1719 MBTs (2798 in wartime)

    2792 APCs/IFVs (4999 in wartime)

    887 artillery pieces (100 mm and above, 1746 in wartime)

    394 warplanes

    64 helicopters

  15. #135
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    India Goverment gave nod to go ahead with weaponization only in the late 1980's. Now it was before 1988 or after 1988, that is a point we can debate but without getting to a conclusion.
    Sorry, that does not match with the reality. Just because your engineers did not build any new components does not mean that there was not a lot of paper refining the designs. Even if we were to assume the go ahead at your date, the number of designs were too many for even the best scientists go come up.

    Also

    Quote Originally Posted by Samudra View Post
    I don't remember the details but India did have a sort of a make do arsenal before 1990.

    Ref. Raj Chengappa's Weapons of Peace. I believe the pieces were being set together for weaponisation right from Nehru's time. Once all the requisite infrastructure was there it was only a matter of a verbal order to proceed.

    I believe Sundarji was shown a few weapons during Brasstacks. Serious weaponisation was initiated by Rajiv before 1990.

    Maybe if somebody has a copy of the book you can verify these claims. My memory has started to fade. I don't know. Maybe its the wimmen or scotch. )
    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    (A small correction Sir: Its Gandhi and not Ghandi as the latter sounds more similar to a cuss word in Hindi).
    Don't take too much offense. Old dog. Hand eye co-ordination is gone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    Regarding Hyposcrasies: All I would say "The Famous Five" commited "The Orignal Sin". Then they also went all around the world telling other Nations not to be sinner simultaneously professing that they being high and mighty have the right to commit 'the sin". At that point India sincerely believed in Global Disarmament because of economic harsh realities it faced at that point. But right now like other N5 its merely paying lip service...
    I agree with you 100% but adding another wrong to the original 5 (not all the same time btw - China signed much later) does not make India's grandstanding any less hypocitical.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    Regarding America wanting to give India the bomb, there was an article that came up in a newspaper, few years back (maybe The Tribune, I tried to search for it in whatever archives were available on the net. But no luck...:( )
    It was during a visit to India, some speech was supposed to be given in Honour of the American President. At that time its said that the President leaned towards American Ambassador to India, who was sitting besides him, and asked him about his opinion on India being given the bomb. But unluckily there was a microphone for public addressal near him which was by chance On. Its said that American President was really offended by this leak incident and Indian Goverment officials had to face a lot of ire because of it.
    What's the context? Were they joking? In either case, a private mutter is not an offer on any table ... and I cannot find any collaborating evidence of this conversation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    Sir, it should be remembered that the China initially got nukes from Soviet itself.
    Nope.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    And thankfully, it was because Indian Strategists were "stupid" enough to see that Peking, with Washingon DC deliberately looking the other way, had started arming Islamabad with the Bomb and missiles (So to speak of hyprocrasies).
    Again, the evidence of the Indian program goes a lot earlier than the period you're stating.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity View Post
    Earlier they were so "smart", that they caused India to suffer a humilating defeat from the hands of China. I think we simply need more stupid people to govern our country who could actually realise about whats happening right now on our northen borders.
    And to quote you. Nothing is happening on your northern border. Despite all the hoopla on this forum, the only thing that is bothering your opposition, not even your government is that Chinese border police are peeing on the snow that you claim is yours. Your own border troops are doing pretty well the same. No increase in tensions. No increase in troop numbers. And an actual increase in trade.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infinity;
    China did not go beyond some aggressive posturing in 1971 due to two facts:
    > India had maintained its troop presence in North Eastern Border
    > Perhaps biggest reason: India had support of Soviet Union
    You've missed the biggest one. China had determined that Moscow wanted war. Splitting Chinese forces in the face of such a threat is an extremely stupid idea.
    Chimo

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Random Thoughts on the Mighty Hog - Part 2
    By Shipwreck in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 168
    Last Post: 21 Nov 09,, 23:46
  2. Analysis: Chechnya
    By Ironduke in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29 Jul 08,, 00:30
  3. How clean is India?
    By Neo in forum Central and South Asia
    Replies: 163
    Last Post: 04 May 06,, 00:09

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •