Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: USMC receives new M777 Lightweight Howitzer

  1. #1
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132

    USMC receives new M777 Lightweight Howitzer

    Higher tech, 5,000 pounds lighter, nice. I bet you'd love to have had these when you were in the Corps Gsgt GG.
    31st MEU receives Corps’ new M777 Lightweight Howitzer

    CAMP HANSEN, OKINAWA, Japan (Dec. 21, 2007) -- The 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit received its first M777 Lightweight Howitzers recently on Camp Hansen as part of a Marine Corps-wide artillery upgrade.

    The new Howitzer, which is scheduled to replace the M-198 Howitzers Corps-wide by 2010, is about 5,000 pounds lighter than the M-198. This difference in weight makes the new Howitzer a more mobile weapon system. Marines can transport it using an MV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft. The older howitzer weighed too much for the aircraft to transport, according to Staff Sgt. J. D. Baters, the battery gunnery sergeant for L Battery, 3rd Battalion, 12th Marine Regiment, 3rd Marine Division.

    Additionally, the M777 Lightweight Howitzer has the ability to fire more advanced artillery rounds. The M777 can fire an Excalibur precision-guided projectile that uses an onboard computer and global positioning system to help guide itself back onto predetermined targets if fired off course.

    The M777 also boasts the same range firing capabilities as the M-198 and a Digital Fire Control System and built in radio. The new DFCS gives Marine gunners the capability to receive coordinates directly from a fire direction center and uses a global positioning system to help zero in on targets, Baters said.

    With the old system, Marines have to communicate with the fire direction center through radio and use iron sights to aim at targets. By cutting down on the time field artillery cannoneers spend receiving and inputting data, they can provide direct fire support more rapidly, Baters said. The M777 is also equipped with iron sights to serve as a backup in case the digital system fails.

    The M777 also has a display that allows the fire direction center to send text messages to cannoneers riding in vehicles or manning Howitzers. The M777 also reduces the amount of time it takes for cannoneers to respond to indirect fire requests, Baters said.

    “When somebody requests artillery support, every second counts,” Baters said. “We can have this gun ready to fire in literally three to four minutes.”

    Because each M777 has the equipment to communicate with the fire direction center directly, the cannoneers can cover a larger area since they no longer need to be grouped together to receive coordinates, according to Sgt. Matthew L. Higgins, a field artillery cannoneer with L Battery.

    “Instead of having all our guns in one spot, we can divide them up and cover a larger area,” Higgins said.

    Field artillery cannoneers with L Battery, arriving from Twentynine Palms, Calif., inspected the M777s before accepting the new guns from the Camp Pendleton, Calif.- based E Battery, 2nd Bn., 11th Marines, 1st MarDiv.

    The 31st MEU’s artillery batteries rotate in and out about every six months to a year as part of the Unit Deployment Program on Okinawa.
    Source: http://www.marines.mil/marinelink/mc...20071220235647

  2. #2
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Mar 05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    5,993
    Quote Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
    Higher tech, 5,000 pounds lighter, nice. I bet you'd love to have had these when you were in the Corps Gsgt GG.
    Actually I had the displeasure of working with the original prototypes of both the VSEL UFH (M-777) and the Royal Ord LTH gun. Way back in 1993-94 while at Ft Sill.

    To an instructor, every one of us preferred the Royal Ord LTH to the VSEL gun that ended up being the M777. Ergonomically a better gun. Easier to place in action, run fire missions and displace.

    But in the shoot off, the VSEL recoil mech held up better.

    Now I will say that my young Marines would have liked to have had a lighter gun back in the day. My days of picking the trails up and manhandling the guns ended with the M-101/M-114s. Except as an instructor.

  3. #3
    Military Professional toemag's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Jan 07
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    904
    I know very little about Artillery pieces, so I searched the web for info and found this for you.

    YouTube - Future Weapons: The New M777 Howitzer

    Merry Christmas and a Happy new year.

    Tony
    Yet another ex-tankie of 1 RTR origin.

  4. #4
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,473
    It's interesting to see how the different services go their different ways on different things. We had the M777 over five years ago in the Army. On the other hand, the Marines adopted the MOLLE some five years prior to the Army. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

  5. #5
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,582

    Shek Reply

    "We had the M777 over five years ago in the Army..."

    I'm not sure that the M777 represents a profound example of your point, especially since it was jointly developed by the Army/Marines. This from Col. John Tanzi, TSM-Cannon and LTC Robert Harper, X.O TSM-Cannon in the Jan. 1, 2006 FA Journal-

    "The Marines are fielding the basic M777, which uses conventional optical fire control. A total of 94 M777s will be fielded to the 11th Marines at Camp Pendleton and 29 Palms, California, and the Marine Detachments at the Field Artillery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and the Ordnance School at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. Fielding will be completed this year.

    When the digital fire control system (DFCS) is integrated into the M777, the howitzer will be redesignated the M777A1. It will provide location, directional reference and digital communications for the fire direction center (FDC). It will provide close and deep fire support, counterfire and interdiction fires and be rapidly deployable to any region and operable in most climates.

    The first M777A1s will be fielded to 2-11 FA, 25th Infantry Division, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, in August 2006.

    In early 2007, software and hardware upgrades will make the M777A1 Excalibur-capable, redesignating it as the M777A2.

    At the same time, the Marines will begin fielding the M777A1 to the 10th Marines at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, and retrofitting their M777s to M777A1s. When the Marines Corps acquires Excalibur projectiles, its M777A1s will be brought up to a common M777A2 configuration.

    The Marines will field a total of 356 LW155 howitzers (including the 94 original M777s), completing fielding in 2009. The Army currently is looking to buy at least 252M777A2s, completing fielding in 2010."


    I believe that the 11th Marines got ALL the LIPR M777s and began fielding as early as May, 2005 in Twentynine Palms. As the article indicates, 2-11 FA was the first ARMY unit to receive the howitzer. They, however, received the M777A1 version.

    I looked and looked but couldn't see any U.S. Army F.A. battalion using the M777 as the IOC lead back in 2002. I distinctly remember ArtyEngineer's excitement at the Canadian deployment of the M777 to A-stan in the spring of 2006. He was geeked!
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  6. #6
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Mar 05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    5,993
    Quote Originally Posted by Shek View Post
    It's interesting to see how the different services go their different ways on different things. We had the M777 over five years ago in the Army. On the other hand, the Marines adopted the MOLLE some five years prior to the Army. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
    This is one of the last units to get the M777. All of the stumps, Lejeune and most of Pendleton already have them. Okinawa and Hawaii are on the bottom of the pecking order

    Now want to talk about long lad time between services adopting the others gear. A few examples. The M-16A2.

    In 1984 trucks pulled into Camp Lejeune and all the armories switched out their A1s for A2s within 1 week. In 1991 when I reported to Fort Sill, the only unit that had M16a2s was the Marine Detachment. This after Desert Storm.

    In 1983 Marine Artillery started fielding the Gun Display Unit for howitzer crews. A MMT came from Bragg to do what they thought was refresher training. When we told them that it was the first time we had seen the GDUs and were pretty much clueless. They couldn't believe it. Army artillery units used them towards the end of the vietnam war.

    Hey we were still using FADAC

  7. #7
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Shek's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 05
    Location
    Krblachistan
    Posts
    11,473
    S-2,
    Snap! I guess we were towing the M198s and hadn't gotten the M777s yet. Too many days looking at the equipment tables and not enough looking at what the gun bunnies actually had! Wish I could have blamed it on early morning eggnog :P
    "So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3

  8. #8
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,582

    Gun Grape Reply

    Gun Grape,

    "Army artillery units used them towards the end of the vietnam war."

    Smoke up your butt, G.G. The GDU communicated digitally with BCS. No digital comms. No LCD read-outs. That stuff didn't exist. Sure as hell not in a doggie arty battalion in Nam.

    BTW, I shot an ARTEP with FADAC in 1984 at Ft. Chaffee.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  9. #9
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Mar 05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    5,993
    Quote Originally Posted by S-2 View Post
    Gun Grape,

    "Army artillery units used them towards the end of the vietnam war."

    Smoke up your butt, G.G. The GDU communicated digitally with BCS. No digital comms. No LCD read-outs. That stuff didn't exist. Sure as hell not in a doggie arty battalion in Nam.
    Damn Doggies

  10. #10
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    4,442

    M777

    GG and S2

    So what is the maximum ranges for the M777 firing the following types of ammunition?

    Common Shell
    Spherical Case
    Cannister




    I remember in the mid to late 1980s the USMC and the US Army seemed to be bounciong back an dforth as to who got which gear soonest.

    M1 to Army in early 1980s; USMC post Desert Storm

    We got the M16A2 in 1988 at the 24 ID

    Go to NTC in 1986 and offlaod trains at Yermo MCLD...they had HEMTTs all over the palce and we were just getting them. 2 years later we had PLS out the wazzoo and the Marines were drooling over those.

    It was all dependent on mission and priorities. The US Army in the 1980s was abotu fielding the Big 5 (M1; M2/M3; MLRS; UH-60; AH-64). USMC was about increasing their flexibility and agility...and that included bringing the F-18 and MV-22 on line.

    I think both did just fine in their priorities.

    And I KNOW USMC gunners are glad they don't have to try to pull an M198 over the shore with a 5-ton...or a 7 ton!!!
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is to know to not use it in a fruit salad.

  11. #11
    Senior Reader Senior Contributor entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Mar 07
    Posts
    2,163
    Perhaps a dumb question, but can howitzers (both self-propelled and towed) serve as direct fire units?

  12. #12
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,582

    2-218 FA in Direct Fire Entropy Reply

    "...can howitzers (both self-propelled and towed) serve as direct fire units?"

    It's fun.)
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  13. #13
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,582

    A.R. Reply

    "So what is the maximum ranges for the M777 firing the following types of ammunition?

    Common Shell
    Spherical Case
    Cannister"


    Not quite as far as our round-shot, depending upon wobble as it leaves the tube.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  14. #14
    Senior Reader Senior Contributor entropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    19 Mar 07
    Posts
    2,163
    S-2,

    How suited are howitzers for direct fire? How accurate would it be?

    I see no AT round is included in the ammo package. I assume that the direct fire accuracy is too low.

    I remember our conversation about the opposite, direct fire weapons in indirect fire role, a time ago.

  15. #15
    Field mechanik Senior Contributor omon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Nov 06
    Location
    bk
    Posts
    3,276
    at the end of ww2 russians fired 203mm howitzers, point blank, on berlin streets, i bet that was devastating
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. M777 Howitzer Booms at Pendleton
    By Y W F in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 20 Sep 05,, 17:02

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •