Page 19 of 38 FirstFirst ... 10111213141516171819202122232425262728 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 285 of 566

Thread: India Vs. China (borderline War)

  1. #271
    Regular
    Join Date
    11 Jul 07
    Location
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    102
    Colonel, very interesting reading ur and urmomma's views on tactics by the PLA on another thread.

    Didnt want to reopen up the other thread since its related to the current topic.


    1. What kind of artillary range and firepower are we talking about wrt to the PLA? What would the likely targets?


    2. What kind of SSM range and firepower are we talking about wrt to the PLA? What would the likely targets? Can the intensity be maintained?


    3. Wouldnt the high altitude give an automatic advantage to the PLA wrt artillary(even SSM)?


    4.Wouldnt the use of SSM's lead to confusion regarding whether it contains a nuclear warhead and thus lead to nuclear war? Would any country take this risk?Or is this a naive question?


    5.I feel India would run out of ordinances first in the war. what do you think?


    6. What kind of response can be put up by India if the first few SSM's are on the current base in Tezpur etc where MKI's are present thus taking out the planes and airbase? There are only 3 squadrons of them currently. This followed up with a missile attack on HAL manufacturing base?


    7. Would China launch conventional missiles on locations where it thinks Indian nukes exist as part of the war strategy? With these locations already destroyed and only a handful of them perhaps remaining no way Indian leadership will pop the remaining on China back in an angry response knowing that the response from China will be devastating on the subcontinent.
    Last edited by FullTank; 28 Oct 07, at 22:21.

  2. #272
    Banned
    Join Date
    12 Nov 07
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post


    5.I feel India would run out of ordinances first in the war. what do you think?



    6. What kind of response can be put up by India if the first few SSM's are on the current base in Tezpur etc where MKI's are present thus taking out the planes and airbase? There are only 3 squadrons of them currently. This followed up with a missile attack on HAL manufacturing base?


    7. Would China launch conventional missiles on locations where it thinks Indian nukes exist as part of the war strategy? With these locations already destroyed and only a handful of them perhaps remaining no way Indian leadership will pop the remaining on China back in an angry response knowing that the response from China will be devastating on the subcontinent.
    First of all India has SSM Capability of its own unlike Pakistan's so called 'home made' one, Second it is imaginable that India will retaliate in Tibet where China has its base. If HAL manufacturing base is attacked then Sanghai and Beijing also come under the range of new AGNI- III IRBM (3000-3300KM.) On What earth you are predicting that India will run out of ammo?
    Simple imagination work.

    Who told you that Chinese effect will be such devastating ? and don't think India will have only handful of missile ?

    Now, I think you should write it in Indo-Pak war context, Pakistan will have devastating effect if it dares to attack India,your imagination is quite suitable in Pakistani context.

    Forgot so easily 1967 Chola incident?
    Last edited by SCobra; 12 Nov 07, at 12:17.

  3. #273
    Banned
    Join Date
    12 Nov 07
    Posts
    0
    The question of missile strike comes when border war escalates into full war.
    Ground situation is different now from 1987, when india deployed 10 divisions and squadrons of Fighters in response of chinese force deployment. The situation was eased by diplomatic effort. During Kargil war both India and Pakistan had fought in Kargil though both had missile and nuke in possession did not use it. Pakistan suffered Heavy Defeat due to lack of fighting skill in high mountain area, and successful strike by IAF on their base in high hilltop. China is concerned with the USA as well , it will not deploy its maximum force in southern border.China will certainly not tend to go border war with nuke powered India rather it will try to engage India through diplomatically. In 1999 China for example maintained a rather neutral stand by not siding with its close ally Pakistan. This is an indication. But we should not let up building a strong presence in Sino-Indo border area, and be watchful whether China does not make any misadventurism.

  4. #274
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    23,988
    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    Colonel, very interesting reading ur and urmomma's views on tactics by the PLA on another thread.
    Sorry for the late reply. So many threads. Lost track of this one.

    Didnt want to reopen up the other thread since its related to the current topic.

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    1. What kind of artillary range and firepower are we talking about wrt to the PLA? What would the likely targets?
    Checking Andy Chan's ORBAT, there are 3 artillery regiments that can immediately be used (152mm tubes) but the PLA has prepositioned enough equipment for 2 more (122mm tubes).

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    2. What kind of SSM range and firepower are we talking about wrt to the PLA? What would the likely targets? Can the intensity be maintained?
    Not likely as a carpet strike. The bulk of their SSM forces are still aimed at Taiwan. India is just not big enough of a concern. If they have 60 days, they can move 5 brigades from Taiwan but I doubt they would have all their targeting procedures done.

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    3. Wouldnt the high altitude give an automatic advantage to the PLA wrt artillary(even SSM)?
    No, both sides are very adapt to reverse slope emplacement.

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    4.Wouldnt the use of SSM's lead to confusion regarding whether it contains a nuclear warhead and thus lead to nuclear war? Would any country take this risk?Or is this a naive question?
    Flight time is too short for any kind of nuclear response by either side. Impact would've occurred long before either side can even issue a warning, let alone a firing order. At which point, you would know if it was a nuclear event or not.

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    5.I feel India would run out of ordinances first in the war. what do you think?
    That would depend on what type of war. The PLA has stockpiled a hell of alot of stock but by the same token, it has inferior manpower numbers to begin with.

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    6. What kind of response can be put up by India if the first few SSM's are on the current base in Tezpur etc where MKI's are present thus taking out the planes and airbase? There are only 3 squadrons of them currently. This followed up with a missile attack on HAL manufacturing base?
    You're talking a full scale war, including targeting civilian infrastructure. I can only say that neither side is thinking that. The PLA's War Zone Campaign and the InA's Cold Start doctrines all have a specific purpose in mind - fast, bold, decisive actions. Those essentially means military targets and a major ground battle between the two armies before both sides retreat.

    Quote Originally Posted by FullTank View Post
    7. Would China launch conventional missiles on locations where it thinks Indian nukes exist as part of the war strategy? With these locations already destroyed and only a handful of them perhaps remaining no way Indian leadership will pop the remaining on China back in an angry response knowing that the response from China will be devastating on the subcontinent.
    Numbers ain't in it. Indian nukes are too disbursed for a confident take down (warheads stored away from missiles requiring at least a 5 missile barrage on each individual warhead and each individual missile - that is if you can find them all).
    Chimo

  5. #275
    Banned
    Join Date
    12 Nov 07
    Posts
    0
    Thanks OoE for your clear points, but I think both sides will avert a full scale war(both having nukes and missiles). I think they will try to solve it diplomatically though it can not be ruled out that again both side will resort to warning and counter warning,(I think first will come from China as it gave a rhetoric statement in 1987 and counter warning will be followed by India.). Even 1967 Chola incident when India Armed Forces fought one day long border clash(1st October 1967 - 2nd October 1967)in Sikkim with the Chinese PLA where Indian troops defeated the Chinese and expelled them from Pt 15450, this border clash did not escalate into a full scale war.

  6. #276
    New Member
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1

    no war between India and China

    I do not think there will be a war between China and India. Indian and Chinese are wiser people. They will not be focus on the little territory on the earth; they will cooperate and strive to explore Mars for humankind. The border between India and China will be peaceful and beautiful.

  7. #277
    Banned
    Join Date
    12 Mar 08
    Posts
    9
    Dalai Lama needs to be assasinated so that India and China can rule asia together. Dalai Lama may be the cause for ww3. he must be killed so people can live on.

  8. #278
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    843
    Quote Originally Posted by retaxis View Post
    Dalai Lama needs to be assasinated so that India and China can rule asia together. Dalai Lama may be the cause for ww3. he must be killed so people can live on.
    Hello Satan, how are you doing today?

    Dalai Lama, is the one hope i have of humanity not finishing itself over the various divisions that exist.

  9. #279
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    23,988
    Quote Originally Posted by kuku View Post
    Dalai Lama, is the one hope i have of humanity not finishing itself over the various divisions that exist.
    I will agree with you the day he admits that he has blood on his hands.
    Chimo

  10. #280
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    843
    In the world we live in, even Gandhi had problems.

  11. #281
    Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,427

    OoE Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    I will agree with you the day he admits that he has blood on his hands.
    Sir, you really believe Dalai Lama Has Blood on his hand?
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  12. #282
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    23,988
    All one has to do is to read the history on how Tibet fell to Beijing and for the follow through, read who supported the insurgency in Tibet.
    Chimo

  13. #283
    Banned
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
    Sir, you really believe Dalai Lama Has Blood on his hand?
    I personally reackon Tibetans would be in much better condition if it was not for him. E.g his uprising and talking down of China has caused the death of thousands of tibetans. Sure he did not kill them with his own hands but basically its like a general ordering his troops to be massacred.

    Thats my opinion obviously you can have your own.

  14. #284
    Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,427

    aaron82 Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by aaron82 View Post
    I personally reackon Tibetans would be in much better condition if it was not for him. E.g his uprising and talking down of China has caused the death of thousands of tibetans. Sure he did not kill them with his own hands but basically its like a general ordering his troops to be massacred.

    Thats my opinion obviously you can have your own.
    If my motherland is occupied by an invading country, I wouldn't care how many of us go below the sword for rising against the enemy and ensuring that the last of the invaders leave my land. Simple. The Tibetan's have every right to Get Massacred in their pursuit to independence.
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  15. #285
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    23,988
    They have the right to resist but they don't have the right to demand others to follow them. Also, Major, the Dali Lama does have Chinese blood on his hands. He supported the insurgency and the uprising that took Chinese lives.
    Chimo

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why We Are in Iraq
    By Leader in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 07 Nov 10,, 15:46
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 21 Jun 08,, 04:33

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •