Page 10 of 38 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 566

Thread: India Vs. China (borderline War)

  1. #136
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,348
    Quote Originally Posted by metalbeast
    India has all kinds of artillery of different calibres, weights, and ranges. To minimize complexity of supply nations like the USA and Russia primarily support two kinds of gun artillery on the battlefield.
    You better give details of the systems used by India, don't make sweeping statements. What are the "two" kinds of arty guns fielded by US and Russia? A prelminary search shows far more systems than you claim.
    I think China is more industrialized than India. With the modernizing of the military, China will be better in logistics.
    I agree that China has much better defence industrial capability. But do they have the money?

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  2. #137
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Terran empire
    I don't have any thing on india but this site is pretty good for the new chinese weapon systems
    Including there new Attack helicopter, Rifles, Apc's, tanks, Hummer clone just about every thing
    http://www.sinodefence.com/
    Lol...don't go by those pictures in sinodefence. The helicopter is not Chinese made, but "photoshopped" images claimed to be prototypes.

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  3. #138
    Contributor Terran empire's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 04
    Location
    purgatory...
    Posts
    357
    Quote Originally Posted by lemontree
    Lol...don't go by those pictures in sinodefence. The helicopter is not Chinese made, but "photoshopped" images claimed to be prototypes.
    yea it's all questionable but then again every thing in life needs a Grain or two of salt. And we have a thread going on CG WZ 10 picks so far i think we have found a A Rooivalk with a fan tail a AH 64 D with chinese Markings and of course 5 "Artist's Impressions" Heck we even have a Video Game promo version on that.

  4. #139
    Regular
    Join Date
    23 Oct 04
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by lemontree
    You better give details of the systems used by India, don't make sweeping statements. What are the "two" kinds of arty guns fielded by US and Russia? A prelminary search shows far more systems than you claim.

    I agree that China has much better defence industrial capability. But do they have the money?
    India supports Western 105mm light gun artillery, 121.92mm Eastern artillery, 130mm Eastern artillery, and 155mm Western artillery. I think they even support 8 inch guns, but I am not sure. This is the army, this is not the entire forces of naval, and marine combined. Russia does support 100mm gun systems that the navy widely supports as well as 130mm, and even 3 inch (76.2mm) guns for light boats, but on the battlefield supplying so many different artillery guns can pose a complexity problem. USA supports mainly the 105mm and 155mm. Russia 152.4mm and 120mm on the battlefield. I am no economy expert, but I think China has a stronger economy than India. China is surging up in the world economy. China realized that supporting so many artillery pieces is redundant and can pose a logistical nightmare that is why they making a move to widely support their D-30 copy and 155mm 45 calibre guns. Gun artillery is still the backbone of artillery in the world.
    Last edited by metalbeast; 03 Mar 05, at 23:44.

  5. #140
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,348
    Quote Originally Posted by metalbeast
    India supports Western 105mm light gun artillery, 121.92mm Eastern artillery, 130mm Eastern artillery, and 155mm Western artillery.
    The arty systems fielded by India are as per terrain requirements. The current arty systems are:-
    105mm IFG - being phased out by 130mm M-46 guns.
    122mm D-30 Howitzer for mech units(Russian origin).
    130mm M-46 field gun (Russian origin, and will replace all 105mm units).
    155mm M-46 field howitzer (Russian origin)
    155mm FH-77B (Swedish)
    120mm heavy mortars for mech and mountain regions.
    SP arty has 105mm and 130mm on Vijayanta chassis, but are being phased out by the T-6 155mm on Arjun chassis.
    So what will remain is just three systems 122mm, 130mm and 155mm. The mountain units will still need the 120mm mortars and so will the mech units.
    This is the army, this is not the entire forces of naval, and marine combined.
    When we talk of artillery, then it is only army. The naval guns have different requirements so leave them out, since naval and army logistics vary.
    Russian arty systems use the following calibres:
    100mm, 122mm, 125mm, 130mm, 152mm, and 203mm.
    US arty systems use the following calibres:
    Earlier the US used various calibres like the 175mm/8inch, 105mm
    Heavy mortars - 107mm and 120mm.
    Field/howitzer guns - 105mm, 155mm cal 39/52, 203mm(phased out).
    Only the US has consolidated the type of arty systems it fields.
    I am no economy expert, but I think China has a stronger economy than India. China is surging up in the world economy. China realized that supporting so many artillery pieces is redundant and can pose a logistical nightmare that is why they making a move to widely support their D-30 copy and 155mm 45 calibre guns.
    No doubt PRC has a much stronger economy and industrial base compared to India. India too is consolidating its arty to 130mm and 155mm (as shown by me above). However, light and heavy mortars will remain with both Indian and China for a long time.

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  6. #141
    Patron
    Join Date
    19 Sep 06
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    My view - A whole bunch of people are going to die over some bragging rights over a few pieces of rock that no one in their right mind would want. Which is precisely why both armies do not want a fight. The politicians, however, ...

    Strictly from an academic PoV, the InA is in somewhat of a superior position than the Chinese. Not enough to conquer Tibet but enough to take the fight to the Chinese. Whether they can win is another question but the fight would not be on Indian territory.
    please give some evidence when you give posts?
    Where is the "superior position than the Chinese"?
    Attached Images Attached Images      

  7. #142
    Patron
    Join Date
    19 Sep 06
    Posts
    289
    more
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  8. #143
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,348
    The very first picture in post # 141 is not from the Indo-China war, but the Korean war. Indian vehicles do not have a white star on their door.

    please give some evidence when you give posts?
    Where is the "superior position than the Chinese"?
    That is 44 years old history, and it cannot be repeated. Same as 1937 when the Japanese ruled over China, it cannot be repeated again.

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  9. #144
    Patron
    Join Date
    19 Sep 06
    Posts
    289
    Quote Originally Posted by lemontree View Post
    The very first picture in post # 141 is not from the Indo-China war, but the Korean war. Indian vehicles do not have a white star on their door.


    That is 44 years old history, and it cannot be repeated. Same as 1937 when the Japanese ruled over China, it cannot be repeated again.
    I agree with you
    we should let the war past
    and China or Iindia will get nothing in the war
    Many soldiers will killed in 1962,both chinese and indinan ,I don't want that happen again.
    China and India are both important country and can get along well with each other.

    As you said ,it will not be repeated .

  10. #145
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by wangrui961 View Post
    please give some evidence when you give posts?
    Where is the "superior position than the Chinese"?
    The evidence has been lay out through out the site. I cited a Chinese PLA Captain who stated that the PLA cannot win unless openning a 2nd front through Pakistan.
    Chimo

  11. #146
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    18 Oct 06
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by k19 View Post
    For those who were interested in the 62 war, I have something you could read about:

    I just can't understand why the Indians always try to compare their army with the Chinese and see us as the threat to them; most of Chinese people won't even care what they do nor has such thought of attacking them, what is the point man? Just like the war in 62, why the hell you have to adopt English’s maps and keep pissing Chinese off when we don't really want to have such war?

    Here is some articles guys, read it, it's made by westerners, neither pro-India and pro-china, hope you could learn something from it and peace alright?

    http://www.centurychina.com/plaboard...ds/1962war.htm
    Thanks for the link

  12. #147
    Regular y_raj's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Nov 06
    Location
    India
    Posts
    39
    i agree with you wangrui,
    it would be better if they join hands and form an alliance along with russia, which is regarded as apossibility by many. but it seems a bit hard after seeing the chinese posture towards pakistan and its help to pakistan to make nukes and SRBMs as well as MRBMs.

  13. #148
    Banned New Member
    Join Date
    28 Nov 06
    Posts
    6
    india has a military without any fighters let it be air, ground, or sea. when i say fighters, i mean men with the courage to fight and not run.

  14. #149
    Military Professional 667medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Jul 05
    Posts
    901
    Quote Originally Posted by chopchop View Post
    india has a military without any fighters let it be air, ground, or sea. when i say fighters, i mean men with the courage to fight and not run.
    I invite you visit this website to discuss with like minded individuals

    www.pakistanidefenceforum.com

    Long Live Pak-China friendship.........
    Seek Save Serve Medic

  15. #150
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    12,855
    Quote Originally Posted by chopchop View Post
    india has a military without any fighters let it be air, ground, or sea. when i say fighters, i mean men with the courage to fight and not run.
    chopchopyou are coming dangerously close to getting banned for flamebaiting. Watch what you say and who you say it about.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why We Are in Iraq
    By Leader in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 07 Nov 10,, 15:46
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 21 Jun 08,, 04:33

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •