+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 150

Thread: Stryker pics from Iraq

  1. #1
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132
    Country: United States

    Stryker pics from Iraq






  2. #2
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    12,608
    Country: United States
    So I guess that chain link fence they ripped out of my backyard is for RPG protection? I love how far we've come from Vietnam....:cry

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Nov 03
    Posts
    2,027
    Country: United Kingdom
    Looks like an apmphibious vehicle to me. But from other threads i suspect it isn't.

    I take it is isn't for front line combat?

  4. #4
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132
    Country: United States
    Originally posted by Trooth
    Looks like an apmphibious vehicle to me. But from other threads i suspect it isn't.

    I take it is isn't for front line combat?
    It isn't an amphibious vehicle. It's a light armored vehicle, yes, used in front line combat.

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    12 Aug 03
    Location
    Long Island, New York, USA
    Posts
    2,726
    Country: United States
    o boy, 1 RPG and those things are goners Who comes up with these ideas? Why not paint a bullseye on it?

  6. #6
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    Put another 30 tons of armor on that thing and it will be just fine:D

  7. #7
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Country: Switzerland
    Armed to the teeth with a single Ma Duece .50BMG though, eh?

    OMFG, how much are we paying a piece for these FUCKING SHIT BOXES again????

    I feel ill....

  8. #8
    Senior Contributor smilingassassin's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Dec 03
    Location
    Vancouver Canada
    Posts
    2,749
    Country: Canada
    They are more resiliant than a Humvee and I'm sure the troops would rather be in the Stryker as opposed to the Humvee which is far more vulnerable to roadside bombs.

  9. #9
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Country: Switzerland
    Most infantry would rather be on FOOT.

    Though if one MUST ride...most infantry would rather be in a BRADLEY.

  10. #10
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    12,608
    Country: United States
    I have to admit, if I had a choice between tooling around in Baghdad in a Humvee or a Stryker, I'd go with the Stryker.
    Imagine if Task Force Ranger had been hauling ass through the Mog in a convoy of Strykers instead of Humvees?
    Yes, they arent Bradleys but then a wheeled vehicle is better in a MOUT environment than a tracked vehicle and an armoured wheeled vehicle is better than an unarmored one, IMVHO.
    BTW, are those smoke-dischargers I see around that M-2?
    They need some damn chicken-shields on that Duece! (Right Snipe? :Beer )

  11. #11
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132
    Country: United States
    I'd take a Stryker over a Humvee.

  12. #12
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Mostly Harmless
    bigross86's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Aug 03
    Location
    Tel Aviv, Israel
    Posts
    10,907
    Country: Israel
    Uh-Oh! Snipe's beliefs are aking a beating. I'm gonna head for the hills.
    Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

    Abusing Yellow is meant to be a labor of love, not something you sell to the highest bidder.

  13. #13
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169
    I'd take an ICBM ride before I got on that POS.:D

  14. #14
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,409
    Country: Canada
    The LAV family of vehicles had already faced tanks, RPGs, and AT mines and the armies, including the USMC, that used them came out the winners.

    It's the training and the people involved. The M113 family saw fantastic success in Vietnam with American usage but were sitting ducks when used by ARVN.

    Let's be clear. USMC LAV-25s killed Iraqi T-72s at the Battle of Al Khafji. So, these ain't POS by any stretch of the imagination.

    Are they're better vehicles? Of course there are. However, can these do the job. A most resounding yes.
    Chimo

  15. #15
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    26 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,169




    Last edited by Praxus; 04 Jan 04, at 04:24.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Why We Are in Iraq
    By Leader in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 07 Nov 10,, 16:46
  2. The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 20 May 08,, 09:48
  3. Iraq in Books - Review Essay
    By Shek in forum The Iranian Question
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 29 Feb 08,, 11:08
  4. Arab volunteers killed in Iraq: an Analysis
    By Shek in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24 Aug 05,, 13:29
  5. Quagmire or not?
    By Shek in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 04 Jul 05,, 18:18

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts