These are letters to the editor of ARMOR magazine regarding the Stryker and the SBCT.
Transformation Article
Response to Above
This is one is on a different topic and I was unable to locate the original articles but it is interesting.
Stryker ATGM is Irrelevant?
Thoughts and/or comments?
Last edited by Wraith601; 06 Feb 06, at 05:06.
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
Your first article was a broken link. The ATGM article is dumb. The 105mm is not designed to kill tanks. Thus, you need some kind of stand off capability. It's not super-potent right now, but a few years down the road when the HTAM or a similar CKEM is fielded, the said author will be signing from most high about the anti-armor capability of the ATGM.Originally Posted by Wraith601
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
It should work now.
I agree with you on the ATGM company statement. Just wanted to start some discussion.
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Share this thread with friends: