![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
|
Most Pointless War in History
My vote goes to WWI. Started by an assasination by a member of a country that hardly participated in the actual fighting, escalated by a domino effect of entries into the war, made terribly bloody by trenches, machine guns and artillery, and ended on conditions that made possible a second, much bloodier war just 21 years later.
__________________
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Actus Reus
Senior Contributor
|
The Soccer War,
The Siachin Conflict Quote:
__________________
"Any relations in a social order will endure if there is infused into them some of that spirit of human sympathy, which qualifies life for immortality." ~ George William Russell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
WWI was bound to happen. There was so much more to it than simply Archduke Franz Ferdinand being gunned down in Sarajevo. The European countries were just circling each other waiting for someone to make a wrong move. As far as its reasonings, it was not a waste. As far as its loss of life, it was ridiculous. The nations had all these new toys to inflict massive casualties, yet they had not updated their strategies to accomodate them. That led to needless death and suffering on a massive scale. The end of WWI with the Brits and French humiliating Germany setup for WWII. They really handled that poorly. France was just ecstatic to finally be on the victors' side and mad about their loss back in the 1870s. Therefore, I would have to agree that WWI was a pointless war only because of how it was fought and how it ended. Had Germany won the war prior to our involvement or had the terms of Versailles been fairer, that nation would have remained stable in the ensuing years. Russia would have emerged as the bigger aggressor in the 1930s and 1940s. I'm probably oversimplifying, but that is how things have seemed to me. Personally, I'd go for the Children's Crusade. They had a whole mess of kids to be sent to the Holy Land. All the kids who went died when their ships sank or were enslaved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
I'd have to say the Vietnam war. It cost thousands of American lives, millions of Veitnamese, Veitnam turned communist anyway (and in turn was invaded by another communist nation afterwords) and it is used by defeatists, Commie lovers and isolationists to predict just how every other war started by America (no matter how well intentioned) will finish.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Bandaid
Military Professional
|
Quote:
During courthship - the woman gets the flowers and chocolates. Engagement - The woman again gets the hediously expensive ring. During the wedding - She again gets all the presents. At divorce - she gets the alimony. And when you kick the bucket - she gets all your property. ...and people still call it a "man's world". ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Actus Reus
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Certainly sir. I was interning at a lawfirm and was assisting on a divorce case. The women (who we were representing) managed to get the house, the car, alimony, the kids (okay I think that is proper) plus 60% of the estate. Last edited by sparten : 10-05-2005 at 09:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Homesick Fool
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Makes you want to do what some dude did here in the UK. Wife was leaving and selling the boat they lived on so he sunk the bastard in the middle of the night. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the world getting better? | ArmchairGeneral | World Affairs Board Pub | 192 | 07-25-2008 13:16 PM |
| What a Republican realist could teach George Bush | Ray | Political Discussions | 2 | 04-18-2007 13:18 PM |
| Articles and links for the Military Professional | Officer of Engineers | The Staff College | 115 | 11-20-2006 11:28 AM |
| Indian Army transformation | Ray | South Asian Defense Topics | 36 | 12-22-2005 02:00 AM |
| Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil | indianguy4u | Political Discussions | 14 | 12-17-2005 05:50 AM |