ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > General History
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2008, 08:53 AM   #1471 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
Ghost88

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost88 View Post
Kettle Hill.

However I think you are mistaking Roosevelt's first charge up Kettle Hill as the only attack. After The First Volunteer Cavalry and the Colored Troops took Kettle Hill the whole US Army attacked SJH including Teddy's force on Kettle.
Not to put too fine a point on it but they were not Colored Troops. That was a Civil War era term only.

They in fact were proud Regulars of the 9th & 10th Cavalry as well as troops from the 24th Infantry. To them the term "Colored" was considered a perjorative since the US Colored Troops of the Civil War were Volunteers while the Buffalo Soldiers were long service veterans of the Regular Army.

And Roosevelt had command only of his regiment. BG Sumner commanded the attack overall.


Buffalo Soldiers at San Juan Hill
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 09:03 AM   #1472 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
12 Hour Rule/24 Horu Rule

Okay, both are past

Let's stick with the Splendid Little War

What 2 unusual weapons were used in support of the 1st US Volunteer Cavalry during the Spanish American War?
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2008, 19:23 PM   #1473 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
Okay, both are past

Let's stick with the Splendid Little War

What 2 unusual weapons were used in support of the 1st US Volunteer Cavalry during the Spanish American War?
Well, the Gatling Gun to start off with. Lieutenant Parker of the New York unit literally had to smuggle in the mules to draw them. He had four Gatlings but one was commandeered by another unit while on his way to Roosevelt's unit.

So he had those three Gatlings giving cover fire.

HOWEVER, in Roosevelt's account, when he first heard that "peculiar drumming sound" at first he thought it was Hotchkiss machine guns.

So I would guess the Hotchkiss as the second one.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 08:59 AM   #1474 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
Nope

The Gatling was not an usual weapon...part of the standard weaponry.

And not the Hotchkiss either.
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 10:04 AM   #1475 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,572
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
Okay, both are past

Let's stick with the Splendid Little War

What 2 unusual weapons were used in support of the 1st US Volunteer Cavalry during the Spanish American War?

Lances
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 10:09 AM   #1476 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
Nope

Last US Force to use lances was the 6th Pennsylvania Cavalry during the Civil War...which they quickly discarded.

Hints:

One was primarily a USN/USMC weapon in an unusual caliber, privately procured.

They other was, shall we say, more experimental in nature. And the Rough Riders did not employ at San Juan/Kettle Hill.
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 14:41 PM   #1477 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
Nope

Last US Force to use lances was the 6th Pennsylvania Cavalry during the Civil War...which they quickly discarded.

Hints:

One was primarily a USN/USMC weapon in an unusual caliber, privately procured.

They other was, shall we say, more experimental in nature. And the Rough Riders did not employ at San Juan/Kettle Hill.
I read somewhere (and some time ago) that some squads were equipped with large bore hunting rifles like the .50 caliber Sharps. They were used more as a sniper rifle than a suppresion fire gun.

Don't know about the other "experimental" weapon, but I do recall Roosevelt's account that he found wearing a sword was completely useless and his always got hung up in the brush. Swords weren't "experimental" of course, but I don't think anybody actually used them. Roosevelt himself said he never had an occasion to draw his except in ceremonial activities.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 14:44 PM   #1478 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
Nope & Nope

Do we want to let this run or should I give the answers?
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 15:10 PM   #1479 (permalink)
ghost88
Regular
 
Join Date: 10-26-07
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
Not to put too fine a point on it but they were not Colored Troops. That was a Civil War era term only.

They in fact were proud Regulars of the 9th & 10th Cavalry as well as troops from the 24th Infantry. To them the term "Colored" was considered a perjorative since the US Colored Troops of the Civil War were Volunteers while the Buffalo Soldiers were long service veterans of the Regular Army.

And Roosevelt had command only of his regiment. BG Sumner commanded the attack overall.


Buffalo Soldiers at San Juan Hill
Also not to put to fine a point on it all the contemepary accounts I have read used Colored win describing the Black troops, Had I said the 9th Cav(Colored) your correction here would be correct as I used it to describe the race of the troops (as used at the time) not so.

On your other point I did not say Roosevelt commanded he did indeed however lead the charge up Kettle and he did so on his own initiative, as Ord led the attack on SJH on his initiative.
Summer was in command of the Cav Div but did not lead nor it seems order the attack he stayed in the rear. Considering his age this was wise of him.
Wheeler did however order the other Inf. to attack in support of Ord.
ghost88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 15:57 PM   #1480 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost88 View Post
Also not to put to fine a point on it all the contemepary accounts I have read used Colored win describing the Black troops, Had I said the 9th Cav(Colored) your correction here would be correct as I used it to describe the race of the troops (as used at the time) not so.

On your other point I did not say Roosevelt commanded he did indeed however lead the charge up Kettle and he did so on his own initiative, as Ord led the attack on SJH on his initiative.
Summer was in command of the Cav Div but did not lead nor it seems order the attack he stayed in the rear. Considering his age this was wise of him.
Wheeler did however order the other Inf. to attack in support of Ord.
The term Colored Troops when capitalized within US Army unit desgiantions refers to the USCT of the Civil War. 9th Cavalry Regiment (Colored) was never a formal name of the unit. The Peacetime Establishment Act of 1866 called for adding four regiments to the line, two white and two of colored from existing USCT. This was in the original language of the bill The official designations were the Ninth and Tenth Regiments of Cavalry. The word Color or Colored was never in their formal name. And the troopers took it as an insult to be referred to as Colored. It was that which I was pointing out.

The reference to who commanded was not addressed to your comments but Rusty's.
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 23:50 PM   #1481 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,572
Country:
Is there anyway to find out who the bugler(s) were at Kettle Hill?
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 08:36 AM   #1482 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
Kb

You would have to find unit rosters.

Any particular reason or are you being your normal ornery self?
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 13:52 PM   #1483 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,572
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
You would have to find unit rosters.

Any particular reason or are you being your normal ornery self?
My grandmother supposedly had a cousin that served with the Rough Riders. I thought she said he was a bugler.
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008, 21:07 PM   #1484 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
Okay, both are past

Let's stick with the Splendid Little War

What 2 unusual weapons were used in support of the 1st US Volunteer Cavalry during the Spanish American War?

It's been some time now (well over 24 hours) that you asked this question. I took a stab at some guesses but then the thread seemed to drift off into Colored fighting units and buglers.

So, what's the answers?
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2008, 08:56 AM   #1485 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,285
Country:
The Sims-Dudley Dynamite gun was used during the siege of Santiago...not at Kettle Hill since ammo was in the wrong place.

dynamite

The Colt Model 1895 Automatic Machine Gun

The unit privately purchased 2 of them in 7x57mm Mauser caliber (same as the Spanish Mauser rifles). Waht was further unusual is the weapon was normally mounted on a gun carriage and used by the USMC and/or USN shore parties. (If you remember the movie The Wind and The Lion you may recall the US shore party of Marines and Sailors. The sailors were pulling carrriages. They had the Colt MGs mounted on them.


Colt Machine Gun
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests)
dave lukins
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patton vs Centurion 1965 Indo-Pakistan war dave lukins Land Forces 183 04-02-2008 08:54 AM
My Opinion of Islam Insomniac International Politics 252 05-22-2007 07:30 AM
History and War: An Interview With Eliot Cohen Shek The Field Mess 0 03-27-2007 17:50 PM
British India Grundy Political Discussions 187 07-01-2006 07:39 AM
Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil indianguy4u Political Discussions 14 12-17-2005 05:50 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8