History Quiz - Page 14

Tarek Morgen · 10-24-2007, 13:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAD_333

By gum, you are right,,,I did type 1938...couldn't have been '38...it was 1936.
My mistake

But the Ruhr reincorporation, your answer, was 1933.

uh ruhr q+was someone else, i was the OKW guy.

JAD_333 · 10-24-2007, 13:30 PM

Braindead and Tarek...excuse me for using you as interchangeable parts...time to retire for the day...working on job and WAB at same time isn't such a good idea...

braindead · 10-24-2007, 15:35 PM

Unfortunately we´re not interchangable. Unlike Tarek I have not been correct on any of my answers . Yet .

Tarek Morgen · 10-24-2007, 15:51 PM

Don't worry your time will come, and I am wrong often enough.

ArmchairGeneral · 10-24-2007, 15:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAD_333

You're right. It was the Rhineland. The Ruhr was reincorporated in 1933. The Rhineland was a gamble because Germany was not yet strong enough to
resist Britain, France and other allies had they reacted militarily to uphold the Treaty of Versailles. If Hilter's gamble failed, senior German officers would have had a pretext for arresting him, and planned to do so. When the allies failed to react, Hitler was confident he could grab other German speaking countries without a fight.

I'm confused. I thought the Ruhr was remilitarized along with the rest of the Rhineland.

JAD_333 · 10-24-2007, 19:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral

I'm confused. I thought the Ruhr was remilitarized along with the rest of the Rhineland.

AG, I am no expert in WWI or german history...I could have gotten some names mixed up. Eeither the Saar or the Ruhr was reincorported into German in 1933. All I know is the Rhineland was a demilitarized zone set up in western Germany by the Versailles treaty to act as a buffer between Germany and Belgium, France and the Netherlands. It was administered by a sucession of allied commissioners until 1930 when all foreign troops pulled out. It, however, was supposed to remain demilitarized. In 1936 Hitler sent "troops" into the zone to remilitarize it in violation of the treaty but on a hunch he could get away with it. Had he been confronted by French troops he would have been whipped badly and censured under the Treaty. The German high command was hoping the French would intervene so they could topple Hitler. The plan was to arrest him. Correct me on this: The nearby Ruhr had remained under German control all along except a large portion of its coal production was to fo to France to help pay down reparations due to France. Around 1924 the French, reacting to strikes by German coal miners, occupied the Ruhr at the cost of some 400 German lives. France ended its occupation soon after. The point is France could not have occupied what was already occupied by the allies. Therefore, I concluded the Ruhr was not part of the demilitarized zone. Historical license...you decide.

**Julie** · 10-24-2007, 23:23 PM

Let's get on with it already !!! I've only got one right so far. Armchair...your turn.

ArmchairGeneral · 10-24-2007, 23:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julie

Let's get on with it already !!! I've only got one right so far. Armchair...your turn.

Being as how I've got inordinately massive amounts of homework that I've already procrastinated on to the point of disaster, I'm gonna give it to braindead, as he was pretty close to right. It was just a lucky guess on my part anyway.

**Julie** · 10-25-2007, 00:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral

Being as how I've got inordinately massive amounts of homework that I've already procrastinated on to the point of disaster, I'm gonna give it to braindead, as he was pretty close to right. It was just a lucky guess on my part anyway.

Very humble of you.

It just seems with all those books you have floating around, you could open just one page and come up with one question.

braindead · 10-25-2007, 04:09 AM

Thank you A.C.General !
well this is probably a simple one - in autumn of 1889 in one important Europ. capital the following happening took place : A circus troupe arrived to city and one of their acts was phenomenal sharpshooter . Last part of the show had the shooter call somebody from the public and from quite a distance shoot the ash from the ´somebodys´ burning cigar . The ´target´ was always one of the troupe , disguised as part of the public , but in this city , he was late . One man jumped to arena , lit a cigar and stood sideways to the shooter . Sharpshooter had hangover from previous evening and was very worried , but still performed the shot magnificently and shot the ash off the cigar .
25 years later the shooter wrote to the former ´target´ asked for a new opportunity . Of course there was no rematch .
Question - who was the target ?

ArmchairGeneral · 10-25-2007, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Julie

Very humble of you.

It just seems with all those books you have floating around, you could open just one page and come up with one question.

Yeah, I could ask about the allosteric control of the pentose phosphate pathway through glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, or perhaps the conditions required for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium to remain constant, or even something about the momentum of the center of mass of an exploding artillery shell, but I figured that would be kind of out of place in a history thread.

ArmchairGeneral · 10-25-2007, 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by braindead

Thank you A.C.General !
well this is probably a simple one - in autumn of 1889 in one important Europ. capital the following happening took place : A circus troupe arrived to city and one of their acts was phenomenal sharpshooter . Last part of the show had the shooter call somebody from the public and from quite a distance shoot the ash from the ´somebodys´ burning cigar . The ´target´ was always one of the troupe , disguised as part of the public , but in this city , he was late . One man jumped to arena , lit a cigar and stood sideways to the shooter . Sharpshooter had hangover from previous evening and was very worried , but still performed the shot magnificently and shot the ash off the cigar .
25 years later the shooter wrote to the former ´target´ asked for a new opportunity . Of course there was no rematch .
Question - who was the target ?

Just a wild arse guess: Archduke Franz Ferdinand?

braindead · 10-25-2007, 04:49 AM

Bigfella · 10-25-2007, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by braindead

Thank you A.C.General !
well this is probably a simple one - in autumn of 1889 in one important Europ. capital the following happening took place : A circus troupe arrived to city and one of their acts was phenomenal sharpshooter . Last part of the show had the shooter call somebody from the public and from quite a distance shoot the ash from the ´somebodys´ burning cigar . The ´target´ was always one of the troupe , disguised as part of the public , but in this city , he was late . One man jumped to arena , lit a cigar and stood sideways to the shooter . Sharpshooter had hangover from previous evening and was very worried , but still performed the shot magnificently and shot the ash off the cigar .
25 years later the shooter wrote to the former ´target´ asked for a new opportunity . Of course there was no rematch .
Question - who was the target ?

The young Kaiser Willhelm II

braindead · 10-25-2007, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigfella

The young Kaiser Willhelm II

Yes , shooter was Annie Oakley . in 1914 she wrote to Wilhelm II offering a rematch .

Your turn sir .

10-24-2007, 13:30 PM	#197 (permalink)
JAD_333 *Defense Professional* Join Date: 04-15-07 Location: Virginia Posts: 2,614 Country:	Braindead and Tarek...excuse me for using you as interchangeable parts...time to retire for the day...working on job and WAB at same time isn't such a good idea... __________________ To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)

10-24-2007, 15:35 PM	#198 (permalink)
braindead Lost in Translation *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 11-30-06 Location: estonia Posts: 1,230 Country:	Unfortunately we´re not interchangable. Unlike Tarek I have not been correct on any of my answers . Yet . __________________ ....

10-25-2007, 04:49 AM	#208 (permalink)
braindead Lost in Translation *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 11-30-06 Location: estonia Posts: 1,230 Country:	no.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Patton vs Centurion 1965 Indo-Pakistan war	dave lukins	Land Forces	183	04-02-2008 08:54 AM
My Opinion of Islam	Insomniac	International Politics	252	05-22-2007 07:30 AM
History and War: An Interview With Eliot Cohen	Shek	The Field Mess	0	03-27-2007 17:50 PM
British India	Grundy	Political Discussions	187	07-01-2006 07:39 AM
Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil	indianguy4u	Political Discussions	14	12-17-2005 05:50 AM

10-24-2007, 15:51 PM	#199 (permalink)
Tarek Morgen *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 02-08-07 Location: Kassel Posts: 775 Country:	Don't worry your time will come, and I am wrong often enough.

10-24-2007, 23:23 PM	#202 (permalink)
Julie Moderator Join Date: 08-04-03 Location: Georgia, USA Posts: 6,320 Country:	Let's get on with it already !!! I've only got one right so far. Armchair...your turn.

10-25-2007, 04:09 AM	#205 (permalink)
braindead Lost in Translation *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 11-30-06 Location: estonia Posts: 1,230 Country:	Thank you A.C.General ! well this is probably a simple one - in autumn of 1889 in one important Europ. capital the following happening took place : A circus troupe arrived to city and one of their acts was phenomenal sharpshooter . Last part of the show had the shooter call somebody from the public and from quite a distance shoot the ash from the ´somebodys´ burning cigar . The ´target´ was always one of the troupe , disguised as part of the public , but in this city , he was late . One man jumped to arena , lit a cigar and stood sideways to the shooter . Sharpshooter had hangover from previous evening and was very worried , but still performed the shot magnificently and shot the ash off the cigar . 25 years later the shooter wrote to the former ´target´ asked for a new opportunity . Of course there was no rematch . Question - who was the target ?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)