Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
|
 |
|
10-24-2007, 09:38 AM
|
#181 (permalink)
|
|
Defense Professional
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Country:
|
Senior German officers planned to arrest Hitler in 1938 if he failed in this major, illegal gamble. What was it? And why was it illegal?
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:00 AM
|
#182 (permalink)
|
|
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Country:
|
Austrian Anschluss
__________________
....
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:48 AM
|
#183 (permalink)
|
|
Defense Professional
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by braindead
Austrian Anschluss
|
no, that was later...
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:58 AM
|
#184 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: Kassel
Country:
|
on the forth of february Hitler unconstitutionanly creates the OKW and made himself Commander in Chief. While he was at it he also got rid of some officers and politicals who were in his way.
__________________
uh I might be wrong
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:22 PM
|
#185 (permalink)
|
|
Defense Professional
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarek Morgen
on the forth of february Hitler unconstitutionanly creates the OKW and made himself Commander in Chief. While he was at it he also got rid of some officers and politicals who were in his way.
|
That's not it, Tarek. The military high command didn't like that but they didn't plan to arrest him for it. Rather the question involves an action he took that involved movement of troops and was a gamble the high command thought would fail...
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:30 PM
|
#186 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: Kassel
Country:
|
mh but you said that the anschluss was after that and I dont remember any more events from january and february 38.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:33 PM
|
#187 (permalink)
|
|
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Country:
|
Retaking Ruhr ? That canīt be right....
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:35 PM
|
#188 (permalink)
|
|
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Country:
|
Just a guess, but would it be moving troops into Rhineland?
edit: eh, braindead beat me to it.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:43 PM
|
#189 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: Kassel
Country:
|
that was 36
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:52 PM
|
#190 (permalink)
|
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional Military Professional
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Country:
|
Czechoslavakia was '38.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:54 PM
|
#191 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: Kassel
Country:
|
yes but he said that the anschluss was later than the event he mentioned, and the treaty of munich is from september the anschluss was in march.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 12:59 PM
|
#192 (permalink)
|
|
Defense Professional
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral
Just a guess, but would it be moving troops into Rhineland?
edit: eh, braindead beat me to it.
|
You're right. It was the Rhineland. The Ruhr was reincorporated in 1933. The Rhineland was a gamble because Germany was not yet strong enough to
resist Britain, France and other allies had they reacted militarily to uphold the Treaty of Versailles. If Hilter's gamble failed, senior German officers would have had a pretext for arresting him, and planned to do so. When the allies failed to react, Hitler was confident he could grab other German speaking countries without a fight.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 13:02 PM
|
#193 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: Kassel
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333
You're right. It was the Rhineland. The Ruhr was reincorporated in 1933. The Rhineland was a gamble because Germany was not yet strong enough to
resist Britain, France and other allies had they reacted militarily to uphold the Treaty of Versailles. If Hilter's gamble failed, senior German officers would have had a pretext for arresting him, and planned to do so. When the allies failed to react, Hitler was confident he could grab other German speaking countries without a fight.
|
Did you not say in 38? the Rhineland was in 36.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 13:19 PM
|
#194 (permalink)
|
|
Defense Professional
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarek Morgen
Did you not say in 38? the Rhineland was in 36.
|
By gum, you are right,,,I did type 1938...couldn't have been '38...it was 1936.
My mistake
But the Ruhr reincorporation, your answer, was 1933. 
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 13:22 PM
|
#195 (permalink)
|
|
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Country:
|
no it was mine 
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.
|
|