ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > General History
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2007, 20:39 PM   #166 (permalink)
wkllaw
Contributor
 
wkllaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-07
Location: New York City or Hainan, China
Posts: 579
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
On the other hand, the first modern comsat proposal was from a Brit in the 1940s...???
Close, but what's his name?
__________________
Those who can't change become extinct.
wkllaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 21:09 PM   #167 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkllaw View Post
Close, but what's his name?
Blake? Clark?
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 21:24 PM   #168 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wkllaw View Post
He thought of a satellite, but not a telecommunications one.
Arthur C. Clarke?
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 21:27 PM   #169 (permalink)
wkllaw
Contributor
 
wkllaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-07
Location: New York City or Hainan, China
Posts: 579
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Arthur C. Clarke?
Correct, your question sir.
wkllaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 21:36 PM   #170 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
This country has expanded its territory by over 3000 sq miles over the past few hundred years, but not by conquest.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 22:26 PM   #171 (permalink)
Julie
Moderator
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 6,340
Country:
India ??
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 22:30 PM   #172 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julie View Post
India ??
Way off.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:03 PM   #173 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,331
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
This country has expanded its territory by over 3000 sq miles over the past few hundred years, but not by conquest.
Canada?
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:08 PM   #174 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canmoore View Post
Canada?
No... let me rephrase.

This country has actively sought to expand its territory since medieval times. It has been quite successful, expanding by over 3000 sq mi over the past few hundred years. Though this country did engage in aggressive conquest at times, this particular territorial expansion was unaccompanied by conquest, at least in the literal sense.

When it has been invaded, it has often given up a portion of its territory, but not to the invaders.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:24 PM   #175 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
No... let me rephrase.

This country has actively sought to expand its territory since medieval times. It has been quite successful, expanding by over 3000 sq mi over the past few hundred years. Though this country did engage in aggressive conquest at times, this particular territorial expansion was unaccompanied by conquest, at least in the literal sense.

When it has been invaded, it has often given up a portion of its territory, but not to the invaders.

Poland
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:29 PM   #176 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
Poland
No. This country is in Europe, and its territorial expansion was not into land that had any prior claim, and wasn't a result of voluntary cession or dynastic union. When it was invaded, it gave up territory for the sole purpose of denying the invader territory.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2007, 23:42 PM   #177 (permalink)
Julie
Moderator
 
Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 6,340
Country:
Russia ??
Julie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 00:24 AM   #178 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
No. This country is in Europe, and its territorial expansion was not into land that had any prior claim, and wasn't a result of voluntary cession or dynastic union. When it was invaded, it gave up territory for the sole purpose of denying the invader territory.
Holland ---3 letters off
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 05:05 AM   #179 (permalink)
Tarek Morgen
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 02-08-07
Location: Kassel
Posts: 807
Country:
I would say holland (netherlands) too, but on the other side they lost about 50% of their land after the united netherlands splitted up into the benelux states. So even with their landwinning from the sea they have much less than with what they started with.
__________________
uh I might be wrong

Tarek Morgen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 05:19 AM   #180 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
Holland ---3 letters off
Your turn.
Quote:
I would say holland (netherlands) too, but on the other side they lost about 50% of their land after the united netherlands splitted up into the benelux states. So even with their landwinning from the sea they have much less than with what they started with.
The land within the Netherland's current borders has expanded 3200 miles by land reclamation from the sea.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patton vs Centurion 1965 Indo-Pakistan war dave lukins Land Forces 183 04-02-2008 08:54 AM
My Opinion of Islam Insomniac International Politics 252 05-22-2007 07:30 AM
History and War: An Interview With Eliot Cohen Shek The Field Mess 0 03-27-2007 17:50 PM
British India Grundy Political Discussions 187 07-01-2006 07:39 AM
Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil indianguy4u Political Discussions 14 12-17-2005 05:50 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8