![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1771 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
AHA! Finally somebody picked up the clue that a young horse is a Colt. The 1905 Luger in .45 ACP lost out by only a few points to the Colt .45 ACP in the Army's 1906 tests.
Serial No. 1 that was used in the tests seems to have been lost forever. Undoubtedly one of the high ranking officers took it home and by this time a descendant probably sold it to a scrap dealer or threw it in the ocean. Serial No. 2 is the only one left in existence and is in a private collection. Yet, the U.S. Cavalry were so impressed with it they put in a special order but the guns apparently were never made. There has been a rumor that 200 were made but never delivered. But I doubt any were made as many other countries were ordering model 1902 7.65 caliber Lugers and many were waiting in the wings for Georg to come out with his 1908 model in 9mm. About 110 variations have been made of the Luger. Back in the 70's was a company that would take your Luger and turn it into the "Wyatt .45". They had to put a whole new barrel on, permanently remove the 9mm magazine, block off the magazine slot in the grip and the gun had to be top loaded. It was about as popular as a corn cob replacing Charmin. Good job Max. Next question is yours.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1783 (permalink) |
|
Burgomaster
|
You're all wrong, Rusty, ghost88, as well as maximusslade.
![]() Newfoundland was never invited to the First Continental Congress. Additional colonies invited were Nova Scotia, St. John's Island (aka Prince Edward Island), Quebec, as well as East and West Florida, which were controlled by the British from 1763 to 1783. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1785 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
How could I be wrong if I didn't give the name of the Colony? So here's my google of it: Most children in North America learn at an early age that the "Thirteen Colonies" revolted in 1775 and after 8 long hard years won their independence with the Treaty of Paris in 1783. What most of us weren't taught is that the British actually founded 14 colonies on the Atlantic coastline of North America. If you went to school in the United States you most likely were taught the 13 colonies. 12 were founded in the 1600's, in order of settlement they are Virginia in 1607, Massachusetts in 1620, New Hampshire in 1623, New York in 1624, Connecticut in 1633, Maryland in 1634, Rhode Island in 1636, Delaware in 1638, Pennsylvania in 1643, North Carolina in 1653, New Jersey in 1660, and South Carolina in 1670. The 13th colony, Georgia, was not settled until 1733, a gap of 63 years! The 14th and last was Halifax, Nova Scotia founded in 1749, 16 years later still. Georgia was settled south of the southernmost colony before it, South Carolina, and Nova Scotia was at the opposite extreme, north of Maine, which until 1820 was part of Massachusetts colony. Officially Nova Scotia had been a colony... Nova Scotia Colony had not sent representatives to the Continental Congress Studying this letter with the historical perspective we can see something which General Washington couldn't, or wouldn't see. The assembly of the Nova Scotia Colony had not sent representatives to the Continental Congress because they were surrounded by Redcoats and imperial Sailors and any such attempt would be learned of and quashed aborning. The 14th colony was under Martial Law with every ships Captain ready, willing, and able to act as a hanging judge at the first hint of open rebellion. Therefore while the Assembly of Nova Scotia had not sent representatives to Philadelphia for either the First or Second Continental Congress it was not from lack of will, but rather fear of retaliation, as was demonstrated in many of the acts of Sabotage preformed in Halifax. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests) | |
| shakari |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Patton vs Centurion 1965 Indo-Pakistan war | dave lukins | Land Forces | 183 | 04-02-2008 08:54 AM |
| My Opinion of Islam | Insomniac | International Politics | 252 | 05-22-2007 07:30 AM |
| History and War: An Interview With Eliot Cohen | Shek | The Field Mess | 0 | 03-27-2007 17:50 PM |
| British India | Grundy | Political Discussions | 187 | 07-01-2006 07:39 AM |
| Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil | indianguy4u | Political Discussions | 14 | 12-17-2005 05:50 AM |