ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > General History
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2008, 20:21 PM   #1726 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
You win! I had Erik Roelfzema in mind. (Blast these old obituaries!!)
Your turn.
I was found in a moment of chance and one of the names I was given was Queen Victoria. I was instrumental in helping may nations defeat the nationalist of a one nation. Although named by some for the Queen of England, I was carried by on an Italian and fed Russian by Americans, what am I?
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 21:51 PM   #1727 (permalink)
maximusslade
Patron
 
maximusslade's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-08
Posts: 223
Can ya fix the grammatical errors? Or were they on purpose?
__________________
Hit Hard, Hit Fast, Hit Often...
maximusslade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 21:59 PM   #1728 (permalink)
maximusslade
Patron
 
maximusslade's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-08
Posts: 223
I am going to venture a guess....

9th London Regiment, Queen Victoria's Rifles
maximusslade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 22:34 PM   #1729 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximusslade View Post
I am going to venture a guess....

9th London Regiment, Queen Victoria's Rifles
No, it is an item not flesh and blood.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 22:44 PM   #1730 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
I was found in a moment of chance and one of the names I was given was Queen Victoria. I was instrumental in helping may nations defeat the nationalist of a one nation. Although named by some for the Queen of England, I was carried by on an Italian and fed Russian by Americans, what am I?
Lake Victoria in Africa?
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 23:35 PM   #1731 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Lake Victoria in Africa?
No one of the names this thing was known by is Queen Victoria

Hint- It was discovered while digging

named by some after the British Queen, it was borne by something from Italy, fed by something from Russia, and crewed by Americans.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 23:56 PM   #1732 (permalink)
maximusslade
Patron
 
maximusslade's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-08
Posts: 223
The Cunard Line Queen Victoria?
maximusslade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 23:59 PM   #1733 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximusslade View Post
The Cunard Line Queen Victoria?
No.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 00:04 AM   #1734 (permalink)
maximusslade
Patron
 
maximusslade's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-08
Posts: 223
Well, I'm stumped.
maximusslade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 00:33 AM   #1735 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximusslade View Post
Well, I'm stumped.
it is a weapon
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 00:55 AM   #1736 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
, fed by something from Russia, .
You mean something that ran on Vodka?
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 00:58 AM   #1737 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
You mean something that ran on Vodka?

boo,

more like 9 pound shells
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 01:09 AM   #1738 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,839
Wait a minute. I saw a picture of the real cannon, but in the movie '55 Days in Peking" (with Charleton Heston) they jury rigged a cannon that I think was an Italian howitzer, used Russian ammunition, manned by US Marines and was put together by a British minister.

Nah! Too far-fetched and I probably got my movie characters and props wrong. But I do recall it used Russian ammo. As for digging it up, that's what throws the monkey wrench into my theory. Why would they have buried it afterwards?

Whoopsy Daisy. Just googled it but the barrel was British, not Italian:

In the compound, the defense was led by the British ambassador, Claude M. McDonald. Fighting with small arms and one old cannon, they managed to keep the Boxers at bay. This cannon became known as the "International Gun," as it had a British barrel, an Italian carriage, fired Russian shells, and was served by Americans.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 01:35 AM   #1739 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,069
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Wait a minute. I saw a picture of the real cannon, but in the movie '55 Days in Peking" (with Charleton Heston) they jury rigged a cannon that I think was an Italian howitzer, used Russian ammunition, manned by US Marines and was put together by a British minister.

Nah! Too far-fetched and I probably got my movie characters and props wrong. But I do recall it used Russian ammo. As for digging it up, that's what throws the monkey wrench into my theory. Why would they have buried it afterwards?

Whoopsy Daisy. Just googled it but the barrel was British, not Italian:

In the compound, the defense was led by the British ambassador, Claude M. McDonald. Fighting with small arms and one old cannon, they managed to keep the Boxers at bay. This cannon became known as the "International Gun," as it had a British barrel, an Italian carriage, fired Russian shells, and was served by Americans.
You got it, when the international force was digging defenses in the diplomatic quater they uncovered the old gun left over form the Opium Wars, I had not heard it was for sure a British gun, it might have been Chinese. It was a God send regardless of who it used to fight for. The Russians had set out on the march with all thier artillery ammunition, but they left the gun itself on the train. The Italians had a 1 pounder Hotchkiss rapid firing cannon and a spare carriage, but very few rounds. Before the International Gun was discovered the defenders were taking the Russian shells prying them apart to reload the Hotchkiss casings. Then the gun was found and lo and behold the Russian shells fit.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 15:06 PM   #1740 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,839
It is fairly well known that the Nisei soldiers of the 242nd in WW II did a lot of the radio communcations in Europe as most German soldiers could not speak Japanese.

Also, Native Americans were used for the same purpose in the Pacific Theater ("Wind Talkers").

But in the First World War, many messages were written and delivered by a courier or even a carrier pigeon. But it was written in a language that no Germans, Austrians or Hungarians could read.

What was that language?
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patton vs Centurion 1965 Indo-Pakistan war dave lukins Land Forces 183 04-02-2008 08:54 AM
My Opinion of Islam Insomniac International Politics 252 05-22-2007 07:30 AM
History and War: An Interview With Eliot Cohen Shek The Field Mess 0 03-27-2007 17:50 PM
British India Grundy Political Discussions 187 07-01-2006 07:39 AM
Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil indianguy4u Political Discussions 14 12-17-2005 05:50 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8