![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1726 (permalink) |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
I was found in a moment of chance and one of the names I was given was Queen Victoria. I was instrumental in helping may nations defeat the nationalist of a one nation. Although named by some for the Queen of England, I was carried by on an Italian and fed Russian by Americans, what am I?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1730 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1731 (permalink) |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
No one of the names this thing was known by is Queen Victoria
Hint- It was discovered while digging named by some after the British Queen, it was borne by something from Italy, fed by something from Russia, and crewed by Americans. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1738 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Wait a minute. I saw a picture of the real cannon, but in the movie '55 Days in Peking" (with Charleton Heston) they jury rigged a cannon that I think was an Italian howitzer, used Russian ammunition, manned by US Marines and was put together by a British minister.
Nah! Too far-fetched and I probably got my movie characters and props wrong. But I do recall it used Russian ammo. As for digging it up, that's what throws the monkey wrench into my theory. Why would they have buried it afterwards? Whoopsy Daisy. Just googled it but the barrel was British, not Italian: In the compound, the defense was led by the British ambassador, Claude M. McDonald. Fighting with small arms and one old cannon, they managed to keep the Boxers at bay. This cannon became known as the "International Gun," as it had a British barrel, an Italian carriage, fired Russian shells, and was served by Americans. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1739 (permalink) | |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1740 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
It is fairly well known that the Nisei soldiers of the 242nd in WW II did a lot of the radio communcations in Europe as most German soldiers could not speak Japanese.
Also, Native Americans were used for the same purpose in the Pacific Theater ("Wind Talkers"). But in the First World War, many messages were written and delivered by a courier or even a carrier pigeon. But it was written in a language that no Germans, Austrians or Hungarians could read. What was that language? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Patton vs Centurion 1965 Indo-Pakistan war | dave lukins | Land Forces | 183 | 04-02-2008 08:54 AM |
| My Opinion of Islam | Insomniac | International Politics | 252 | 05-22-2007 07:30 AM |
| History and War: An Interview With Eliot Cohen | Shek | The Field Mess | 0 | 03-27-2007 17:50 PM |
| British India | Grundy | Political Discussions | 187 | 07-01-2006 07:39 AM |
| Abuse of History in Pakistan: Bangladesh to Kargil | indianguy4u | Political Discussions | 14 | 12-17-2005 05:50 AM |