ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > The Field Mess
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-09-2007, 14:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
Cactus
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-01-07
Posts: 591
AR,

Thanks!

Do you know which of those units (if any) were to redeploy to Pacific/SEAsia? I just checked wiki entry on British 6th AB Div (I had not known of their existence actually, a bit shadowed by British 1st AB perhaps in a good way ), and came to know that they deployed 1 brigade to SE Asia, with plans to deploy the entire 6th AB Division. The Brits also planned to move forward another newly raised Airborne Division, 44th Indian AB, to participate in Op. Olympic.

6th Airborne Division (United Kingdom) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
44th Airborne Division (India) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 14:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,019
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cactus View Post
AR,

Thanks!

Do you know which of those units (if any) were to redeploy to Pacific/SEAsia?
101 ABN & 17 ABN I believe were selected, en route.

I believe the 82 ABN folks were pretty high in points so were cycling back to the US to backfill with 13 ABN and others.
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 16:25 PM   #18 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
According to Wikipedia, this is the ORBAT for Olympic

U.S. Sixth Army (Gen. Walter Krueger)
40th Inf. Div. (Brig. Gen. Donald Myers) (22,000 men)
158th Inf. RCT (Brig. Gen. Hanford MacNider) (7,600 men)

U.S. I Corps (Maj. Gen. Innis P. Smith) (95,000 men): 25th Inf. Div., 33rd Inf. Div., 41st Inf. Div.

U.S. XI Corps (Maj. Gen. Charles P. Hall) (113,000 men): 1st Cav. Div., 43rd Inf. Div., Americal Div., 112th Cav. Reg.

U.S. V Amphib Corps (Maj. Gen. Harry Schmidt) (99,000 men):
2nd Marine Div., 3rd Marine Div., 5th Marine Div.

6th Army reserves:
U.S. IX Corps (Maj. Gen. Charles W. Ryder) (79,000 men):
77th Inf. Div. 81st Inf. Div., 98th Inf. Div.;
11th Abn. Div. (Maj. Gen. Joseph M. Swing) (15,000 men)

ORBAT for Coronet:


U.S. First Army (Gen. Courtney H. Hodges):

U.S. III Amphibious Corps: 1st Marine Div., 4th Marine Div., 6th Marine Div.
U.S. XXIV Corps: 7th Inf. Div., 27th Inf. Div., 96th Inf. Div.,
Follow-on corps: 5th Inf. Div., 44th Inf. Div., 86th Inf. Div.

U.S. Eighth Army (Lt. Gen. Robert L. Eichelberger):

U.S. X Corps: 24th Inf. Div., 31st Inf. Div., 37th Inf. Div.
U.S. XIII Corps: 13th Arm. Div., 20th Arm. Div.
U.S. XIV Corps: 6th Inf. Div., 32nd Inf. Div., 38th Inf. Div.
Follow-on corps: 4th Inf. Div., 8th Inf. Div., 87th Inf. Div.

Army Forces Pacific Reserve: 97th Inf. Div.
Follow-on corps: 2nd Inf. Div., 28th Inf. Div., 35th Inf. Div.
Follow-on corps: 91st Inf. Div., 95th Inf. Div., 104th Inf. Div. 11th Abn. Div.

British Commonwealth
Commonwealth Corps*, (Lt. Gen. Charles Keightley):
UK 3rd Inf. Div., Canadian 6th Inf. Div., Australian 10th Div.

*The corps was to have included, as its initial components, the British 3rd Infantry Division, and two new divisions being formed for the purpose of the invasion: the Australian 10th Division and the Canadian 6th Division. It was to have been led by the British Lt. Gen. Sir Charles Keightley. However, it was highly unlikely that the Australian government would have concurred in the appointment of a commander who had no experience fighting the Japanese.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 23:32 PM   #19 (permalink)
tankie
tankie
Military Professional
 
tankie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-22-06
Location: u/k
Posts: 2,044
Country:
Send a message via MSN to tankie Send a message via Skype™ to tankie
I have seen P/H for sale on ebay , am i correct that they are not worth much if they have not been presented and named to a soldier ??? , as the one i saw was very cheap , or maybe a scam ???
__________________
TANKIE , WITHOUT WAX
tankie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2007, 19:52 PM   #20 (permalink)
Ironbar
New Member
 
Join Date: 07-20-06
Location: Chattanooga, Tenn,USA
Posts: 11
Often wondered if Gen MacArthur would have been one of those casualties; would the Truman-MacArthur show down have happened six years or so earlier?
Ironbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2007, 13:28 PM   #21 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,693
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironbar View Post
Often wondered if Gen MacArthur would have been one of those casualties; would the Truman-MacArthur show down have happened six years or so earlier?
Given MacArthur's rather suicidal habit of surveying the battlefield from the front lines (and occasionally beyond), it's very likely that his luck could have run out during Downfall.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
17 February 1945 - Iwo Jima History vaughn The World Wars 0 05-20-2007 11:26 AM
House Democrats Offer Plan to Ban Use of 'Global War on Terror' Shek 2008 US Presidential Election 52 05-16-2007 11:46 AM
Do G4 have a case. crooks Political Discussions 165 12-31-2006 06:58 AM
Soldier's Purple Heart THL World Affairs Board Pub 11 05-29-2006 23:23 PM
Primary Target - August 6 1945 vaughn The Field Mess 4 05-16-2006 10:49 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8