ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > The Field Mess
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-16-2007, 10:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
VarSity
Contributor
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Leicester
Posts: 465
Country:
Nuclear scare after Japan quake

"A strong earthquake in central Japan has damaged a large nuclear power plant causing a leak of radioactive material, officials at the plant have said.
Water containing radioactive substances leaked into the sea and a fire broke out in one of the Kashiwazaki plant's electrical transformers.

The reactors at the plant automatically shut down during the magnitude 6.8 earthquake.

At least seven people were killed and hundreds injured in the earthquake."
BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Nuclear scare after Japan quake
That does not sound like fun!!

But a question for the Navy buffs out there, have any nuke powered ships ever been sunk? And what sort of environmental damage can be caused by all this? Ive never really thought about the whole radioactive water thing.
VarSity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 12:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarSity View Post
"
But a question for the Navy buffs out there, have any nuke powered ships ever been sunk? And what sort of environmental damage can be caused by all this? Ive never really thought about the whole radioactive water thing.
No surface nuclear ships have been sunk. However nuclear powered submarines have. The USS Thresher (SSN-593) and USS Scorpion (SSN-589).

Russia has also lost some nuclear powered subs.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2007, 02:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
SnowLeopard
Military Professional
 
SnowLeopard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-18-06
Location: Texas
Posts: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
No surface nuclear ships have been sunk. However nuclear powered submarines have. The USS Thresher (SSN-593) and USS Scorpion (SSN-589).

Russia has also lost some nuclear powered subs.
That's sort of correct .................. and sort of not correct.

First of all, this link can give one a pretty good start of sinkings and other incidents, ship wise:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_marine_propulsion

Of course, it does leave out the US boat that sunk during construction and the Palomares (sp?) incident, but the former wasn't a reactor accident and the latter was a nuclear bomb in deep water that was recovered.

But about the surface ship icebreaker Lenin: essentially, Lenin supposedly suffered a reactor accident around 1966. The damage reactors were dumped in locations in the Kara Sea.

See: Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Sponsored by OSTI

AND the first NY Times article

Further, the accounts of Soviet naval nuclear material dumping makes quite interesting reading and in some ways, makes the loss of operation submarines like the Mike boat and K-219 compartively minor.

See: The New York Times:

"Soviets' Secret Nuclear Dumping Causes Worry for Arctic Waters; Wastes From Vessels Discarded for 3 Decades Secret Nuclear Dumping by the Soviets Is Raising Fears for Arctic Waters"
By PATRICK E. TYLER Special to The New York Times. New York Times (1857-Current file). New York, N.Y.: May 4, 1992. ; p. A1 (2 pages)

"RUSSIANS DESCRIBE EXTENSIVE DUMPING OF NUCLEAR WASTE; DISPOSAL ON OCEAN FLOOR Government Says 18 Reactors Went in the Sea as Rules Were Often Violated Russians Describe Dumping of Nuclear Waste Moscow says it has not checked the dump site of 16 reactors."
By WILLIAM J. BROAD. New York Times (1857-Current. Apr 27, 1993. ; p. A1 (2 pages)

Finally, this site might provide one with nights of interesting reading:
Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Basic Search
------------------------------------------------
("Hell No, we won't glow! Hell No, we won't glow! Hell No, we won't glow!"--protesters outside a nuc power plant demostrating, (wtte))
SnowLeopard is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How clean is India? Neo Political Discussions 163 05-03-2006 19:09 PM
Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council Dreadnought Political Discussions 13 01-16-2006 15:14 PM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM
An Article worthy of Lull..... MIKEMUN Political Discussions 2 03-18-2005 20:04 PM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8