![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Which superpower would have won a full scale far against each other? | |||
| U.S. |
|
7 | 50.00% |
| U.S.S.R. |
|
7 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#106 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Give those nevertheless in English
- на русском языке, пожалуйста. я имею затруднение понимать вашу английскую язык. я не думаю, то война против России было бы этим же как в Ираке. я думаю то, война было бы очень трудно. Мы вытерпели бы много потерь. Мое мнение, однако, наши Военно-воздушные силы не приобрел превосходство. но наши сухопутныа войска были бы более лучшими. |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Times of the Iron Curtain has ended 18 years ago!!!
Вы верите ваше правительство говорит вам правду сегодня? Я впускаю, мое knowlege вашей страны будет 7 лет старых. поже 9/11 я работалв против террорисме. Однако прежде чем я работал изучающ ваши возможности. Вы продавали половину ваших воиска. правда? |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
In ground operation, you could not excel above us. You represent the sizes of Russia, its relief, quantity of armies and the population, etc. I also very much doubt of the superiority of your technics (as it still never collided with the opponent of its age). I already spoke you, that Russia has centuries-old history of wars against conquerors. In case of attempt to win Russia, enemies always collided with enormous persistence of its all population. You were always very sensitive to losses, and in case of ground war your losses would be huge. I do not think that you were ready to such war in 80th years, and the more so now. PS: Know, you repeat a course think of many up to you. But after that Poland became a part of Russian empire (and was to it till 1917), Swedes have been beaten out from Ukraine, Russian cossacks were in Paris, and later Russian tanks in Berlin. Such as you, history nothing trains
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
I can buy any newspaper (set from them oppositional), or to look for example the Russian channel of NTV or European EvroNews. You understand nothing in modern Russia! All conversations on infringement of a freedom of speech is a full delirium! I can tell to you also, that you judge the world under messages FoxNews and CNN (which not on a straight line are financed due to two your parties) What means have sold? To whom? I do not understand you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I think that it is war would be absolutely unpromising not for us, not for you.
- Agreed. In ground operation, you could not excel above us. You represent the sizes of Russia, its relief, quantity of armies and the population, etc. I also very much doubt of the superiority of your technics (as it still never collided with the opponent of its age). - Disagree, but let's leave it at that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I can tell to you also, that you judge the world under messages FoxNews and CNN (which not on a straight line are financed due to two your parties)
- I'm not judging anything from news sources. What means have sold? To whom? I do not understand you? - The highest bidder, a Columbia Drug cartel ended up with one of your submarines. |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
I did not hear about it. And what class there was a submarine? I doubt, that the greater submarine was necessary for them, it very dear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 (permalink) | |
|
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
no subs got sold to drug dealers. there are some bad apples, but it no way means that russian navy or army is all like that. all armys have bad apples. as russian saying goes: слышал звон, да не знаеш где он. translation: heard the noise, but don,t know where it came from.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin Last edited by omon : 03-26-2008 at 15:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 (permalink) | |
|
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
thou, i wonder what crew would they use to operate it, but than again nothing surprises me these days. when i was a kid we used to ride bikes to a army base in odessa, there we would trade ciggarets, for badges, petlitci, pogoni, zna4ki, once i personaly brought a bottle of vodka, i got almost new army belt for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
32M (USD) for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 (permalink) | |||||
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The only thing the USSR did well was space missions. Their cosmonauts have a much better chance of getting home safely. Quote:
As for Iraq, in some ways thier best units were even better than those fielded by the Red Army. The Republican Guards had superior tube artillery via the South African 155mm, superior communications via fiber optics, combat experiance, professional cadres and a unified language and national identity. With the exception of the quality of equipment there is no reason to think they performed any less well than an equivalent Russian soldier. To say the US didn't fight in its league is to miss the key points of the US victory- battle management. The US moved faster and kept its eyes on the enemy while blinding the enemy in turn. Desert Storm was an information war and was fought at a level the Red Army could never hope to match under the Soviet heirarchy. Modern Russia is attempting to change this with the kontrackt soldiers but still has to deal with short enlistments and large numbers of dispirited draftees. She also lacks the US capabilities in information warfare. |
|||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Random Thoughts on the Mighty Hog - Part 2 | Shipwreck | Military Aviation | 102 | 05-10-2008 15:24 PM |
| Do G4 have a case. | crooks | Political Discussions | 165 | 12-31-2006 06:58 AM |
| Soviet Air Power in Afghanistan | IDonT | Military Aviation | 0 | 06-19-2006 16:50 PM |
| Israel to enhance range of Indian SLBM Sagarika to 2500 km | Ray | South Asian Defense Topics | 61 | 12-13-2005 23:00 PM |
| Lies about the USSR | agent09 | The Western Alliance | 47 | 05-30-2005 06:31 AM |