Closed Thread
Page 15 of 19 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 283

Thread: Who has the strongest military in Europe?

  1. #211
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Very enlightening in deed. So, Captain, are Turk modernization efforts just basically follow the leader? ie, we'll get whatever the Americans/British/French are getting?

    Do you have visionaries who can picture the battlefield 15-20 years from now and get the stuff you need?
    Chimo

  2. #212
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,254
    Country: United States

    Ucar Reply

    Ucar,

    You're a superb resource at WAB. Flat-out.

    Thanks for participating.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  3. #213
    Regular
    Join Date
    17 Jul 07
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    80
    Country: United States
    I'd say Germany has the best. Haven't read the entire thread, so excuse me if someone has "proven" that to be wrong.

    Oh, and the British military is far from a joke.
    Last edited by Shuttlecat; 26 Sep 07, at 00:07.

  4. #214
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    19 Jun 07
    Posts
    320
    Country: Turkey
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Very enlightening in deed. So, Captain, are Turk modernization efforts just basically follow the leader? ie, we'll get whatever the Americans/British/French are getting?

    Do you have visionaries who can picture the battlefield 15-20 years from now and get the stuff you need?
    Sir

    Turkish arms procurement program and decision making is structured around the Turkish General Staff, Undersecretariat of Defence Industries, and Ministry of National Defence.

    Turkish General Staff is responsible for preparing the groundwork, and conducting the research for procurement and modernization requirements. They usually decide on the needs of the Armed Forces, and contact the Ministry of National Defence. The Ministry then authorises its Undersecretariat to issue a RfP paper based on the information the TGS has supplied to the Ministry. Following the completion of procedural steps, a number of systems are invited for system testing and demonstration. Following the completion of tests the final winner is declared and the agreements are signed.

    The TGS representatives are the authority tasked with evaluating system effectiveness, and interprating test results. Thus, the final decision is usually is not the most combat effective system proposed to TAF. The last decision to purchase the T-129 attack helicopter has caused significant contraversy among military personnel. The primary critisms were focused on the facts that the systems has not been proven in combat, has less combat load capability when compared to its rivals, and has only been used by the Italian Armed Forces although it has been flying since 2000. In the first competition the AH-1Z had won, but the final decision was cancelled over disagreement on production and offset agreements. T-129 entered the first competition, but was discarded in favor of the AH-1Z. I nte second round, it came out as the winner.

    Thera are more stories to tell, but I am unable to source them for WA members to read, so I will pass them by for the time being.

    TGS has a working group of high ranking officials who work on a joint basis with the Undersecretariat to determine future requirements and necessities. The decisions to implement the Turkish TAFICS system, integration of UAVs, Tanker Aircraft, AWACS systems were all borne from the studies of this group. Naturally, a heavy US/NATO influence is felt in arms procurement programs, and most of the common projects are also accepted by Turkey as well.
    Last edited by Ucar; 26 Sep 07, at 09:23. Reason: Typo

  5. #215
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Captain,

    Do continue your fascinating narration of the workings of the Turk Army. If you have stories to tell, I really don't mind sipping a scotch while reading them. Also, please if you have some funny stories, do share in the Field Mess thread Stories. There are bound to be a few that you hurt your ribs laughing.
    Chimo

  6. #216
    Regular
    Join Date
    18 May 06
    Location
    San Jose , Costa Rica
    Posts
    25
    Country: Costa Rica

    Army of Poland

    Hello everybody!

    I read that Poland has 3 Mech and 1 Armored Divisions, but I haven´t found a more precise description on this formations.

    Somebody has information regarding this?

    Thanks

  7. #217
    Administrator Tarek Morgen's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Feb 07
    Location
    Kassel
    Posts
    4,097
    Country: Germany
    uh I might be wrong


  8. #218
    JMH
    JMH is offline
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    24 Jan 07
    Location
    Alexandria and Everett and various other locations.
    Posts
    132
    Country: The country of me, myself and I.
    European military strength is misleading, because European military forces do not have the staying power to fight a long term large scale modern war. European countries also do not have the political will to fight for any reason, and most Europeans would be glad to see all the armed forces in Europe disbanded and banned. Today is not the 1930's, Europe today is starting to succumb to it's disease of Socialism and the decline of European military power is just another symptom of this disease. A what if scenario of European powers fighting each other is not a realistic scenario. A more plausible scenario is massive internal strife in France, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands erupting into limited civil war with the central governments in these countries struggling to maintain power in the face of Muslim terrorism, crime, Anarchist violence, and this combined with the threat of environmental disaster (rising sea levels, failure of crops, shortage of Fresh water) coupled with economic disaster (increasing food costs, rising unemployment, loss of seaports) which would alienate European civilian populations from they're governments, making them more susceptible to extremism.
    Last edited by JMH; 25 Oct 07, at 03:05.

  9. #219
    Regular Maggot's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Oct 07
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    105
    Country: Canada
    I'd go to this site before hitting up Wiki.

    GlobalSecurity.org - Reliable Security Information

    I mean go see what Wiki has to say, but you need to always take it with a grain of salt.
    Work is the curse of the drinking class.

  10. #220
    Contributor VarSity's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Jun 07
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    666
    Country: United Kingdom
    From a non professional point of view, and based on my limited knowledge, I would put my vote on the UK or Germany, with the UK just ahead because of the wealth of experience Germany has missed out on.

    The UK proved with operation like the Falklands, that we can operate away from home, under our own power. And whilst I agree there was alot of luck involved, I cant think on another nation that has had this sort of fight post WW2.

    Also the UK has seen alot of action, and has developed many skills that are key to the current and near future conflicts we will be fighting (I refer here to Urban combat/patrol skills learned through our stay in Ireland)

    When the UK gets its new carriers up and running I think they will have the best all round package of any European military.

  11. #221
    Military Professional Recon_sgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    30 Sep 04
    Location
    Curragh, Kildare
    Posts
    244

    UK (I'm back momentarily)

    Varsity despite as you say your limited knowledge I would tend to agree. The UK generally speaking tends to show itself as the stronger either because it is or because it is involved on a large scale in more operations than its close rivals and therefore can demonstrate more effectively its capacity.
    The Falklands while a success as I'm aware showed some glaring holes in the MOD's thinking at the time and I can only hope that the RN after all it has done for the UK are never again treated as the lesser of the 3 departments (one can only hope from over here )

    JMH
    most Europeans would be glad to see all the armed forces in Europe disbanded and banned.
    Is this the begining of a self righteous opinionated utterly bias and unsupported rant because if so thats a gem of an opener!
    Followed swiftly by this interesting statement which given its on the heels of a reference to 1930's Europe might lead some of us to wonder exactly where this is all going (if anywhere).

    Europe today is starting to succumb to it's disease of Socialism and the decline of European military power is just another symptom of this disease.
    A more plausible scenario is massive internal strife in France, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands erupting into limited civil war with the central governments in these countries struggling to maintain power in the face of Muslim terrorism, crime, Anarchist violence, and this combined with the threat of environmental disaster (rising sea levels, failure of crops, shortage of Fresh water) coupled with economic disaster (increasing food costs, rising unemployment, loss of seaports) which would alienate European civilian populations from they're governments, making them more susceptible to extremism.
    Why is it more plausible, your opinion is yours and your welcome to it (as all are, well except that guy over there ) but your concocting a scenario from god only knows what and throwing it out there along with some doom and gloom stuff about rising sea levels and so on. Also Muslim terrorism is a threat to be sure but not to the level you are suggesting. To be honest I seen a more plausible possibility watching V for Vendetta (by the way a damn good movie) than what you have presented .

    D
    they have us surrounded, the poor bastards.

  12. #222
    Military Professional Recon_sgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    30 Sep 04
    Location
    Curragh, Kildare
    Posts
    244

    Oh dear where are my manners

    Ucar,
    I have not as yet read all of what you posted but judging by the response you have put in some most interesting information. kudos from my rain ridden corner and I will read shortly.
    they have us surrounded, the poor bastards.

  13. #223
    Regular Maggot's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Oct 07
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    105
    Country: Canada
    I think a lot of people overlook Spain, in terms of military power, largely because they weren't very involved in the World Wars.

    They have a big army, and a lot of rapid deployment troops. They have a lot of tanks, lots of armoured carriers, but a deficit in IFV's.

    Most of their airforce, except for their F-18's are old, but that's not much different than the rest of Europe either. Spain is planning to modernize their air force with the Eurofighter.

    The Spanish navy is huge! They have a carrier group, subs, and a division of marines. They're not a pushover and they continue to modernize.
    Work is the curse of the drinking class.

  14. #224
    Banned
    Join Date
    13 Jun 07
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,297
    Country: Russian Federation
    The Spanish still haven't retired some of the AMX30s, never mind M60s. Their Leo 2 arsenal is pretty large (430 or so iirc).

  15. #225
    JMH
    JMH is offline
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    24 Jan 07
    Location
    Alexandria and Everett and various other locations.
    Posts
    132
    Country: The country of me, myself and I.
    Quote Originally Posted by Recon_sgt View Post
    Varsity despite as you say your limited knowledge I would tend to agree. The UK generally speaking tends to show itself as the stronger either because it is or because it is involved on a large scale in more operations than its close rivals and therefore can demonstrate more effectively its capacity.
    The Falklands while a success as I'm aware showed some glaring holes in the MOD's thinking at the time and I can only hope that the RN after all it has done for the UK are never again treated as the lesser of the 3 departments (one can only hope from over here )

    JMH

    Is this the begining of a self righteous opinionated utterly bias and unsupported rant because if so thats a gem of an opener!
    Followed swiftly by this interesting statement which given its on the heels of a reference to 1930's Europe might lead some of us to wonder exactly where this is all going (if anywhere).




    Why is it more plausible, your opinion is yours and your welcome to it (as all are, well except that guy over there ) but your concocting a scenario from god only knows what and throwing it out there along with some doom and gloom stuff about rising sea levels and so on. Also Muslim terrorism is a threat to be sure but not to the level you are suggesting. To be honest I seen a more plausible possibility watching V for Vendetta (by the way a damn good movie) than what you have presented .

    D

    Many people are offended by the truth and you are no exception.

    Apparently the British government takes the threat of rising sea levels more seriously than you do. If you look at the Thames River in London you would see large gates built across it, which can be closed when necessary, when London is threatened by high tides due to the increasing sea levels.

    The last major climatic shift in Europe was devastating and one result was large numbers of starving peasants, who formed revolutionary groups and attacked governments in Western Europe. Considering that most Europeans are currently dependant on government welfare they would probably become upset if this welfare support was suddenly reduced or eliminated. This kind of internal strife is much more likely than a large scale continental war between medium European powers.

    Most Europeans simply will not accept the fact that Muslim Terrorists would like to kill them all and if Muslim Terrorists succeed in detonating a Nuclear or radiological device in Europe, Europeans would most likely blame the USA and they're own governments for the attack rather than unite together to fight the Muslim Terror threat.

    Also, Socialists and Muslim terrorists have a few things in common:

    -Hatred of Jews
    -Hatred of Christianity
    -Hatred of Capitalism

    Since France is the birthplace of Socialism, the more extreme socialists that reside in Europe (and American Universities), would be greatly heartened to see Muslim Terrorists succeed, which is why they whine so loudly about the rights of detained Muslim Terrorists. Yet these Socialists will not lift a finger to help any Christians who are under attack from Muslim extremists.

    Also, it is very unlikely that Europe’s Socialist Governments would wage war against each other; the more likely scenario is civil strife and repression within Europe rather than a general war between European nations. Consequently, counting apposing numbers of military units, troop numbers and military hardware is pointless because European countries never intend to actually fight any major wars. If a major war begins, Europe will look to the USA for it’s security rather than fight and attempt to win on its own.
    Last edited by JMH; 28 Oct 07, at 05:20.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Random Thoughts on the Mighty Hog - Part 2
    By Shipwreck in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 168
    Last Post: 22 Nov 09,, 00:46
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 21 Jun 08,, 05:33
  3. Articles and links for the Military Professional
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Staff College
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 20 Nov 06,, 16:28
  4. China's Changing Military Ideology
    By Frank Zhou in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04 May 06,, 00:58
  5. Policy OKs First Strike to Protect U.S.
    By Julie in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09 Apr 05,, 11:39

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts