+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Russia’s Black Sea Fleet gains a base in Abkhazia after war with Georgia

  1. #1
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454
    Country: Guatemala

    Russia’s Black Sea Fleet gains a base in Abkhazia after war with Georgia

    Eurasia Daily Monitor -- The Jamestown Foundation
    November 26, 2008 — Volume 5, Issue 227

    IN THIS ISSUE:
    *Russia’s Black Sea Fleet gains a base in Abkhazia after war with Georgia
    *…..and compromises naval security in the Black Sea

    .


    A Rogue Fleet in the Black Sea

    Russia’s Black Sea Fleet operated with total impunity—political and legal, as well as military—against Georgia during the August war. Breaching the neutrality of Ukraine, where it is mainly based, and tearing apart international maritime law, the Russian fleet’s actions exploited the vacuum of Western power and international authority in the Black Sea. With the United States and NATO distracted elsewhere and complacent about Russia and the Turkish government seeking a special relationship with the Kremlin, the Russian fleet enjoyed a free hand to attack Georgia and to violate Ukraine’s sovereignty in the process.

    The Russian Defense Ministry’s official newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda has published a lengthy narrative about one part of the naval operations against Georgia. This account suggests that in late July the Russian fleet was already rehearsing the operation against Georgia that was to follow in August (just as Russian forces in the North Caucasus practiced a ground operation against Georgia) in late July and up to August 2.

    According to this partial account, a naval group including the large landing ships Tsezar Kunikov, Saratov, and Yamal, as well as four smaller combat ships, most of them based in Sevastopol, took part in the combined-arms exercise Caucasus-2008. These ships and their personnel practiced “landing by assault troops on an unfortified shoreline” on Russia’s Black Sea coast, after which they did not return to Sevastopol but anchored in Novorossiysk from July 25 onward, awaiting further orders.

    These ships launched the naval operation on August 8, landed naval infantry near Sokhumi, crossed what Russia calls the “Abkhaz-Georgian maritime border” (that is, deep inside Georgia’s internationally recognized territorial waters) on August 9, issued an attack warning against any vessel within a 35-mile radius, and sank (or so the narrative implies) two Georgian coastguard cutters on the high sea. The Russian naval group then proceeded to “screen” Georgia’s Poti harbor, where Russian troops sank the remaining Georgian coastguard cutters at their piers in the harbor (Krasnaya Zvezda, October 29, via BBC Monitoring Global Newsline, November 24).

    As an outcome of this war, Russia has substantially expanded its de facto shoreline, territorial waters, and economic zone in the Black Sea by absorbing Abkhazia. This expansion has no legal basis; but Russia is enforcing it in practice, and no one will challenge it in the foreseeable future.

    The Russian fleet can police this expanded area by operating out of Novorossiysk on the Russian coast and, soon, out of Abkhazia. The Russians plan to create a naval or coastguard station in Sokhumi and have begun rebuilding the naval base at Ochamchire in the southern part of Abkhazia. In Soviet times Ochamchire was used as a submarine base at one stage and for the coastguard at another time. Abandoned in the early 1990s, the base is now being repossessed by the Russians as a valuable asset due to its location inside a bay.

    At the moment, Russian divers and other naval specialists are busy measuring the depth and other characteristics of the Ochamchire base, preparatory to defining its role for Russia’s Black Sea Fleet or the coastguard. When reactivated, probably starting in 2009, the Ochamchire base will operate in close coordination with three other Russian military installations in Abkhazia: the Gudauta land and air base (which the Russians are now refurbishing), the FSB border troops in the Gali district (created in October to face the rest of Georgia), and the planned naval station in Sokhumi. Under the Russian Navy’s modernization program, sixteen new ships are said to be planned for delivery to the Black Sea Fleet by 2015 (RIA Novosti, November 21; Messenger, November 24).

    Inasmuch as the new ships will take up berthing space at Novorossiysk, Ochamchire, and Sokhumi, this will undoubtedly become an excuse for Russian foot-dragging on withdrawing the fleet from Sevastopol, where the lease from Ukraine will expire in 2017. Given that fleet’s size, the relocation from Sevastopol to Russian Black Sea ports would probably have to commence by 2010 in order to be completed on schedule. Moscow, however, takes the position that talks with Ukraine on withdrawing the fleet can be held when the 2017 deadline draws near. This would practically ensure the Russian fleet’s stay in Ukraine past the deadline, with or without Ukrainian consent to prolong the basing agreement (see EDM, October 23).

    —Vladimir Socor



    Addressing Naval Imbalance in the Black Sea After the Russian-Georgian War

    During the last decade a network of maritime security arrangements developed in the Black Sea, with all riparian countries participating. These arrangements center on the BLACKSEAFOR activities, the Black Sea Harmony operation, and a few other joint projects on maritime security. Focused on handling post-modern (“new-type”) challenges to security, and partly turning from means to that end into ends in themselves, these arrangements ultimately provided a multilateral cover on Russo-Turkish naval joint sovereignty. This de facto condominium has excluded NATO naval presence as such from the Black Sea, to the frustration of NATO members Romania and Bulgaria and NATO aspirants Georgia and Ukraine.

    BLACKSEAFOR, Black Sea Harmony, and the rest proved completely irrelevant during Russia’s attack on Georgia and in its aftermath. They lack the mandate and the means to deal with real security issues and can not even set the agenda of internal discussions without unanimous consent, that is, without Russian consent in the case of the Russian-Georgian conflict. These collective arrangements proved equally irrelevant when Russia’s Black Sea Fleet breached Ukraine’s neutrality, using its territory to attack Georgia.

    Ukrainian President Yushchenko and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs protested against this flagrant violation and demanded that the Russian fleet notify Ukraine in advance each time its ships crossed Ukraine’s maritime border in the future. Moscow replied disdainfully to the protests, and the Russian fleet has disregarded Ukraine’s prenotification request.

    This situation again demonstrated Russia’s willingness to exploit its naval superiority against its Black Sea neighbors. With Turkey watching passively from the sidelines and NATO responding with a one-time visit by five ships in September, it has fallen to the United States to address the imbalance in the aftermath of the Russian operation.

    From the August war to date, the United States has maintained an uninterrupted naval presence in the Black Sea. That presence is constrained, however, by the Montreux Convention’s limitations on naval tonnage passing through the Turkish Straits and duration of naval visits in the Black Sea. The United States has therefore rotated its ships in the Black Sea at intervals consistent with that convention.

    The Sixth Fleet’s flagship USS Mount Whitney, destroyers USS Dallas and Barry, oceanographic ship Pathfinder, and other U.S. ships have been cruising in the Black Sea and visiting Georgian, Bulgarian, and Romanian ports, as well as Ukraine’s naval port in Sevastopol. The Mount Whitney’s second visit ended on November 19 and has been followed seamlessly by the USS Barry on a two-week mission (AGERPRES, November 20).

    Although largely symbolic, these naval visits provide a visible demonstration of U.S. security commitments in the region. Beyond symbolism, however, the naval imbalance between Russia and its neighbors needs to be addressed in practical terms, following the attack on Georgia.

    The United States and Ukraine are discussing the possibility of the U.S. handing over two frigates of the Oliver Hazard Perry class, armed with guided missiles, to the Ukrainian Navy. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Ukrainian Defense Minster Yuriy Yekhanurov broke this news on the October 8 during a meeting in Ohrid of the defense ministers of South-East European countries. The discussions are in progress.

    First built in the 1970s by the United States, frigates of this class are equipped for anti-submarine and surface combat as well as for air defense. According to Ukrainian sources, the U.S. Navy currently has 30 frigates of this class on active duty and another nine in reserve. From 1994 to 2002 the United States handed over four frigates of this class to Egypt, seven to Turkey, and one to Bahrain, and built four of them for the Australian Navy. Frigates of this class are regarded as far more advanced and powerful than any ship in the Ukrainian Navy’s inventory (UNIAN, October 9; Glavred, November 18).

    Some West European countries also show an interest in improving Ukraine’s naval capabilities, following the Russian fleet’s defiance of Ukrainian sovereignty. Dutch diplomats and the Swedish Defense Attaché in Ukraine met on November 19 with the Ukrainian Navy’s commander, Admiral Ihor Teniukh, at the Ukrainian naval base in Sevastopol. They discussed possible Dutch participation in the Sea Breeze-2009 exercise (an annual U.S.-led exercise in Ukrainian coastal areas) and possible cooperation by Sweden with the Ukrainian Navy’s reform program. (UNIAN, November 19).

    Following Russia’s invasion of Georgia, NATO has disinvited Russia from the alliance’s Active Endeavor operation in the Mediterranean (where Russian participation was only token in any case). It remains to be seen whether BLACKSEAFOR activities will continue business as usual with the Russian fleet, after its attack on Georgia and breach of Ukrainian neutrality. For its part, Turkey seems set to proceed with Black Sea Harmony unperturbed by Russia’s recent conduct.

  2. #2
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,774
    Country: United States
    Looks like Europe is going to pay a price for keeping Turkey out of the EU.

  3. #3
    Former Staff Senior Contributor Ironduke's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Aug 03
    Location
    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts
    10,132
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    Looks like Europe is going to pay a price for keeping Turkey out of the EU.
    z, how is the Russian base in Abhkazia related to Turkey and EU membership?

  4. #4
    Senior Contributor Yusuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    26 Dec 07
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    2,121
    Country: India
    Being left out of the EU, its looking towards Russia and therefore not influencing matters in that region i would imagine.

  5. #5
    Military Professional Shiny Capstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    18 Sep 08
    Location
    Windsor, UK
    Posts
    1,106
    Country: United Kingdom
    Quote Originally Posted by zraver View Post
    Looks like Europe is going to pay a price for keeping Turkey out of the EU.
    Europe (at least the people) doesn't want Turkey in the EU, they are not European, (culture is completely different for one).
    Nulli Secundus
    People always talk of dying for their country, and never of making the other bastard die for his

  6. #6
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,774
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
    z, how is the Russian base in Abhkazia related to Turkey and EU membership?
    Bringing Turkey into the EU would bind Turkey to certain policies and help keep Russia at bay. Bringing Turkey into the EU and militarily into a unified Euro-corps with a supra-federal legal mechanism might also be a way of bypassing the Montaux Convention and give Europe the ability to flood the black sea with warships. But its too late now...

    Quote Originally Posted by Shiny Capstar View Post
    Europe (at least the people) doesn't want Turkey in the EU, they are not European, (culture is completely different for one).
    Is it because they are Muslim? But what about Bosnian and Albanians?

    What is so different between Turkish and Greek cultures? They've absorbed a lot from one another.

    What is European culture BTW? Is it defined in Rome, Paris, Berlin... Is there such a thing as European culture. Or do you mean Western European? I mean really whats so close about the cultures of Norway and Romania? Or Italy and Finland?

  7. #7
    Regular
    Join Date
    08 Nov 08
    Posts
    36
    The United States and Ukraine are discussing the possibility of the U.S. handing over two frigates of the Oliver Hazard Perry class, armed with guided missiles, to the Ukrainian Navy.
    What are two OHP class frigates going to do against the Black Sea Fleet. Absolutely nothing! I doubt russia would think twice with two OHP's in the Black Sea.
    Does anyone know roughly what comprises the Black Sea Fleet?
    Is the Kuznetsov part of it?

  8. #8
    Regular
    Join Date
    15 Nov 08
    Posts
    126
    The Russian Black Sea fleet isn't particularly powerful - many of the ships are outdated, & a number in pretty poor repair.

    That said, there is the Moskva, a powerful Slava Guided Missile Cruiser;
    a couple of Krivak class Guided Missile Frigate's;
    some decent Guided Missile Corvette & Boats - Bora's, Nanuchka-III's, & Tarantul-III's;
    half a dozen Landing Ship's (maybe 4 in operation);
    & maybe a couple of Kilo sub's.

    ---

    RE: *Russia’s Black Sea Fleet gains a base in Abkhazia after war with Georgia
    *…..and compromises naval security in the Black Sea
    A Rogue Fleet in the Black Sea
    Complete garbage...
    Russia has long been the major presence in the Black Sea, & the US wants to kick to them out so they can take over. Only other major presence was Turkey when it was the Ottoman empire...

    The Black Sea Fleet is considered to have been founded by Prince Potemkin on May 13, 1783, together with its principal base, the city of Sevastopol. Formerly commanded by such legendary admirals as Dmitry Senyavin and Pavel Nakhimov, it is a fleet of enormous historical and political importance for Russia. In 1790, Russian naval forces under the command of admiral Fyodor Ushakov defeated the Turkish fleet at the Battle of Kerch Strait.[1]

  9. #9
    Regular
    Join Date
    15 Nov 08
    Posts
    126
    Also, very much doubt that the Sukhumi port in Abkhazia will become the major Russian base in the Black Sea, if the Sevastopol base ends up closing in 2017.

    Will probably host a small fleet, but not much more:
    "Sukhumi could easily host Black Sea Fleet ships, for instance a naval brigade of up to 30 vessels," said Admiral Eduard Baltin, commenting on Bagapsh's statement.

    Baltin, 71, said a naval brigade might comprise a division of small ASW ships, a division of small missile ships or boats, and a division of minesweepers.
    Novorossijsk, which is a deep water Russian port in the Black sea is much more likely.

    The commercial port of Novorossiysk, with the market capitalization of $1,110,000,000, serves Russian sea trade with regions of Asia, Middle East, Africa, Mediterranean, and South America. It is the busiest oil port in the Black Sea and the terminus of the pipeline from the Tengiz Field, developed by the Caspian Pipeline Consortium.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Should members of the Church of God go to war?
    By Ray in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 08 Jan 09,, 01:49
  2. Analysis: Chechnya
    By Ironduke in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29 Jul 08,, 00:30
  3. Armenian Genocide, did it happen?
    By zraver in forum The World Wars
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 28 Jun 07,, 13:14
  4. Articles and links for the Military Professional
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Staff College
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 20 Nov 06,, 15:28

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts